Channel
@flora_do_upora
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
239subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001773876292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @flora_do_upora |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/flora_do_upora |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 239 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 240 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 241 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 242 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 242 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 58.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 41.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Канареечник канарский. Может, помните, хотела выбросить семена в прошлом году. Но нет, не поднялась рука😂 В этом году посадила. И действительно, никакой декоративности нет, как сорняк, поэтому воткнула среди растений повыше, чтобы не видно было🤭 Колосочки, да, красивые, только очень маленькие
🔥3
Статица, как и гелихрузум, не меняет цвет и не деформируется при сушке. Родной стебель прекрасно держится и держит цветок. Сушить обязательно "вверх ногами" в сухом, тёмном, проветриваемом месте. Это общее правило для сушки любых растений на сухоцвет
❤🔥4
ГЕЛИХРИЗУМ (бессмертник) Живой, как сушёный. Сушёный, как живой. Жаль только, с родным стеблем не высушить, не держит форму. Да и на этом стебле ещё куча бутонов. Нашла варианты: нанизывать цветы на шпажки, заготавливать для них стебли подорожника (идеально) и некоторых злаковых. 1, 2 фото - высушены в электросушилке. 3, 7 фото и видео - высушены в темноте. "Если нет разницы, зачем платить больше?"))) Разница есть то…
❤🔥3
Стабилизированные растения отличаются от высушенных тем, что остаются эластичными, не крошатся, не осыпаются, не ломаются, остаются почти как живые. Но стабилизации поддаются далеко не все растения, а некоторые стабилизировать не имеет смысла, лучше высушить. Например, статица, гелихризум, краспедия, о которых расскажу дальше
🔥2
Начну "закидывать" вас сухоцветами) В этом году я ими что-то прям увлеклась 😁 Это на данный момент самая грандиозная затея - стабилизация метрового мискантуса, вторая попытка. В первый раз взяла мискантус, фалярис тростниковый (5, 6 фото) и и элимус песчаный (7 фото). Поставила в смесь глицерин-вода 1:2. Солнце не попадало, но светло в помещении. На момент, когда выступила "глицериновая роса", они уже поменяли цвет, …
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @flora_do_upora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Флора до упора” (@flora_do_upora), 239 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flora_do_upora.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.