2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 559–561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 03:34
560
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:10
560
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.4%
avg views ÷ 560 subscribers
Avg views / post
249
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (22 March 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
497
Reactions total
11
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
183
Videos
1
Links
15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
116 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
38
32.8%
👍
23
19.8%
🙏
14
12.1%
🔥
8
6.90%
😁
7
6.03%
😱
7
6.03%
🤡
6
5.17%
🫡
4
3.45%
😢
2
1.72%
🤔
2
1.72%
🤝
2
1.72%
🏆
1
0.862%
😇
1
0.862%
🤗
1
0.862%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📉 Обновил свой взгляд по рынку
Пока глобально ничего не меняю — рынок все еще выглядит скорее медвежьим, чем бычьим.
Что думаю сейчас:
• Локально BTC еще может сходить выше 67k и обновить локальный максимум
• Но основное ожидание остается прежним — снижение в район 53–49k.
Именно зону 53–49k рассматриваю как основную для набора позиции по BTC и интересующим альтам. Это тот диапазон, где готов действовать агрессивнее.…
Сейчас главное не спешить. Приближаемся к 67к - 68к откуда я буду ждать падения рынка. Напоминаю что тренд все еще нисходящий. Дно я ожидаю увидеть в сентябре октябре. Если у вас нету позиции я бы не стал заходить в биток эфир по текущим ценам. Лучше уж подождать.
Короткий апдейт по BTC:
В прошлом обзоре я ставил первое сопротивление на уровне 64к после чего небольшую коррекцию. Так и произошло. Сейчас торгуемся около 61.5к из-за новостей связанных с Сейлором.
Сейчас хороший твх для тех кто хотел зайти, но не успел. В ближайшие 2 недели я думаю мы дойдем до уровня 67к откуда далее я буду ждать более глубокую коррекцию.
The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ETH: пробой годовой трендовой или очередной отказ?
Эфир отскочил от $1507 и подошёл к $1800 — ровно к нисходящей трендовой, которая давит на цену почти год. Каждое касание этой линии раньше заканчивалось сливом.
Что изменилось сейчас:
— шорт-сквиз: за сутки ликвидировано ~$290 млн шортов — в 2 раза больше, чем лонгов
— с Binance вывели 166 000+ ETH за день — рекордный отток за 3 года. Монеты уходят с биржи, продавать…
Слабые данные по занятости США — преждевременная эйфория 📉📈
Опубликованные показатели занятости в США: 57 000 новых рабочих мест против консенсус-прогноза в 114 000. Провал почти в два раза.
Ключевой контекст, который часто упускается: рынок закладывал вероятность около 34% для повышения процентной ставки уже в июле и опасался ястребиной риторики ФРС. Доллар США находился на 14-месячных максимумах. Слабый отчет сни…
BTC/USDT
До последнего думал, что рынок еще может показать фокус и это не полноценная медвежка. Но падение BTC с 80к до 59к дало хороший такой подзатыльник 😅
Как бы многие ни кричали "этот цикл другой", рынок уже не раз показывал, что любит ставить таких ребят на место.
Сейчас, как по мне, альты разделились на две категории:
📌 проекты с реальной ценностью
📌 и проекты из серии "мама, я мемкоин" 😁
Если смотреть пр…
Прошел почти месяц после моей ликвидации.
За это время жизнь нормально так проехалась по мне 😁
Пытался устроиться в БКС, Сбер Премьер, Альфу на продажи инвест продуктов. Собесы проходил, но везде отказывала СБ.
Максимальная ирония:
человек, которого рынок ликвиднул, не прошел безопасность в инвестиции 🤝 Возможно дело в 161 фз а может в другом тут хз
Машина уже месяц стоит в автосалоне — не покупают. Снизил цену🥲
С…
Сегодня ночью меня ликвидировали первый раз в жизни. Это скорее было очевидно для меня последние 3 дня. Я тянул позу как мог и не ожидал что настанет этот день. 4 года работы коту под хвост. Когда я открывал эту позицию по 2$ я даже представить не мог что этот токен раскачают до 28$.
Я теперь банкрот. Можно было выйти в октябре с рынка и купить большой коттедж, но слишком большие амбиции помешали мне сделать это. Пл…
Реалии жизни:
Заходишь на маленький сайз - позиция летит в нужную сторону.
Заходишь на большой сайз так все идет против тебя.
+160% норм, но не буду фиксировать. Тяну дальше. Есть кто зашел со мной?
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @flipperfliper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дневник флиппера” (@flipperfliper), 560 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flipperfliper.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.