Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Flagman

Channel

Flagman

@flagmangg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,454subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002524591477
TypeChannel
Username@flagmangg
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/flagmangg

Growth

5,4545,4705,4627 August 2026 — 5,465 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,470 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,458 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,454 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,452–5,472 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:245,454-4
11 Aug 2026, 20:125,458-12
8 Aug 2026, 16:505,470+5
7 Aug 2026, 19:185,465first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.4%
avg views ÷ 5,454 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,150
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (4 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total21,502
Reactions total862
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,390 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48234.7%
❤‍🔥42530.6%
🔥21415.4%
custom 54561266896145209031248.92%
💯594.24%
👏423.02%
181.29%
🏆141.01%
🥰70.504%
🤩50.36%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,390reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @flagmangg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC702 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1-10 августа мы в прайме проводили марафон по поиску клиентов дал ребятам: все способы, шаблоны, логику, они полетели искать клиентов 10 дней подряд 😶‍🌫️ поискали.. поставьте сюда 💯 если считаете, что в монтаже тяжело найти клиента, хочу эксперимент провести

💯4120❤‍🔥11

8 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC≈1,390 views64 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

120к на пассиве с рассылок Вы очень быстро собрали х2 реакций от тех что я просил, но я заработался над одной движухой о которой расскажу позже 🤫 щас хочу дать вам подтверждение своих слов, что метод, который я даю это не про "один раз сработало и кайф", а работает системно и у постоянно История Кирилла Точка А - тильт, больше тысячи офферов улетели в труху показал, что нужно не закидывать клиента полотном с текс

❤‍🔥37🔥14👏112

6 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,680 views163 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Самый быстрый способ получить клиента – Как поэтапно превратить обычного человека в клиента на сотни тысяч рублей Чтобы вы понимали всю ценность метода: с его помощью я сработался с топ 1 ютубером по фортнайту в прошлом декабре (с обычной рассылки) и работаем мы по сей день Метод решает главную проблему: 90% монтажеров фрилансеров пишут обычные ктрл+с ктрл+в рассылки > потом видят, что их банят и не читают > расст

116❤‍🔥28👏17🔥1🤩1

2 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈2,140 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Начался август, финишная прямая ☀️ Last chance для каждого, кто хочет хоть как-то измениться, но все лето откладывал действия Но справедливости ради, за месяц можно реально достичь больших результатов, если поставить цель и начать каждый день двигаться Для себя ставлю цели на август: регулярнее появляться в канале (много есть что рассказать) и гриндить Гриндить тему рассылок 🤑 Я вижу как многие запускают сервисы

custom 54561266896145209035721🔥19

31 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC≈2,190 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Таблица с материалами из ролика 🖥 Маст-хев для всех, кто работает с постоянными клиентами, потому что достаточно один раз сесть с клиентом, прописать все моменты, минимизировать правки, делать ролики быстрее и зарабатывать больше, забирайте Ссылка: [забрать таблицу] Также в ролике я упоминал таблицу насмотренности, она уже давно лежит в канале [вот тут] Те, кто еще не работает с постоянниками - готовьтесь, в авгу

🔥1397👏2

30 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC≈2,150 views63 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

летсгоу добиваем меньшую часть сверху и закидываю вам таблицу 🖥 В чем её суть: В прошлом ролике я сказал, что нужно максимально автоматизировать и ускорять процесс, эта таблица - идеальный помощник Ты один раз садишься и капитально прописываешь все моменты под клиента, после согласовываешь с ним, и при монтаже тебе больше не надо будет ничего выдумывать + вечно вносить правки, все материалы, стили и референсы будут

33❤‍🔥16🏆14

28 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC≈2,390 views188 reactions23 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новый ролик на канале 😍 Я снова в кондициях 😈 – За 3 минуты я выдал 7 упражнений, чтобы вы могли сразу после просмотра применить их, повысить уровень, а соответственно и чек СМОТРЕТЬ РОЛИК 200 реакций на этом посте и выкладываю все полезные приколы из видео 🎁

❤‍🔥104🔥4439👏1

26 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC≈2,760 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Стиль монтажа, который приносит клиентов Мне постоянно пишут блогеры [даже с аудиторией 2.5млн+], что им нравится смотреть мои ролики чисто потому что нравится как это смонтировано Например с ролика про говорящую голову ко мне пришло 17 человек, которые готовы заказывать у меня - хотя в своих роликах я даже не упоминаю, что беру заказы)) И очевидно, большую роль играет мой стиль роликов 😎 Я не говорю о том, что э

24custom 545612668961452090319❤‍🔥13🔥3

22 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC≈2,730 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

new yt video soon.. последний кстати неплохо идёт, меня это жестко подпинывает выпускать ролики быстрее, поэтому планирую много контента на август 🍀 как у вас успехи летние?

30❤‍🔥15custom 545612668961452090314🔥2

19 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC≈3,370 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Счастье в моушне 🌟 и я не про моушн-дизайн, а именно про действия Я давно понял, что вы все знаете что делать, чтобы начать зарабатывать, но проблема именно в отсутствии действий Одна из главных частей счастья - чувство прогресса, когда ты постоянно в движении И когда человек перестает что либо делать - очень быстро потухает Я много раз замечал это на себе, когда поддаешься лени и потом накручиваешь себя за то,

❤‍🔥3316💯14🤩1

9 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC≈6,390 views130 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мой личный плейлист Epidemic sound + способ скачивать треки оттуда бесплатно Вчера весь день был без связи, поэтому закидываю плейлист из последнего ролика сейчас Я редко делюсь чем-то личным, чем пользуюсь сам, но этот случай исключение Ссылка на плейлист: https://www.epidemicsound.com/playlist/zxuogwpp9kks3unv66n0e11k0qeedsmg Берете трек, копируете ссылку сюда и скачиваете бесплатно Накидайте максимум реакций

🔥7628❤‍🔥23custom 54561266896145209033

7 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC≈3,650 views113 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😍 Новый ролик на канале — Всё про формат говорящей головы, смотрим, применяем и делаем это как прогуляться в парке СМОТРЕТЬ РОЛИК Чем больше вы пропушите этот пост реакциями, тем быстрее выложу все полезные приколюхи с ролика

55❤‍🔥29🔥22custom 54561266896145209034🥰2🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @flagmangg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 264,787 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Flagman” (@flagmangg), 5,454 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flagmangg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.