Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fillswift🇧🇾🇦🇿

Channel

Fillswift🇧🇾🇦🇿

@fkdooffof

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

80subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002554932457
TypeChannel
Username@fkdooffof
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fkdooffof

Growth

8084827 August 2026 — 84 subscribers8 August 2026 — 83 subscribers9 August 2026 — 83 subscribers16 August 2026 — 81 subscribers23 August 2026 — 80 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 22:4580-1
16 Aug 2026, 02:2781-2
9 Aug 2026, 17:4683no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:3983-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:4884first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 4 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 9 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘2621.8%
2521.0%
❤‍🔥1512.6%
🔥1411.8%
custom 522915957664909308165.04%
💯65.04%
custom 610947614831437719354.20%
custom 526975069838328120843.36%
😍43.36%
custom 519511670378831904932.52%
👎21.68%
💋21.68%
🤮21.68%
🥴21.68%
🍾10.84%
👍10.84%
💩10.84%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
97
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 10 we hold a reading for · 70%
Most on one post
54
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fkdooffof. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 January 2026 to 31 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Mar 2026, 23:36 UTC154 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥75👎2🤮2

3 Feb 2026, 12:29 UTC356 views14 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ночная прогулка + холодный воздух = перезагрузка 😮‍💨

custom 610947614831437719353💘3❤‍🔥2👍1

2 Feb 2026, 21:00 UTC468 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

❤️

6

Signed GuruRandom 💎 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]

17 Jan 2026, 14:39 UTC514 views17 reactions54 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🏔🎿

💘104🔥2custom 52291595766490930811

15 Jan 2026, 11:00 UTC413 views18 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

С пополнением 🎁

💯6custom 52291595766490930813custom 52697506983832812083💘2🥴21💋1

5 Jan 2026, 22:53 UTC371 views14 reactions25 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘6custom 51951167037883190493custom 52291595766490930812🍾1💋1custom 52697506983832812081

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @fkdooffof. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fillswift🇧🇾🇦🇿” (@fkdooffof), 80 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fkdooffof.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.