Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

回国IP,香港IP, WiFi盒子

@fk99k_vip

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

279subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002493521400
TypeChannel
Username@fk99k_vip
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fk99k_vip

Growth

2799 Aug 2026, 16:02 — 279 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 18:11 — 279 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 16:029 Aug 2026, 18:11
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 278–280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 18:11279no change
9 Aug 2026, 16:02279first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.1%
avg views ÷ 279 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held10 (18 May 202620 July 2026)
Views total246
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC111 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

已配置并测试好,准备发货,感谢老板支持

19 Jul 2026, 01:41 UTC135 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://sites.google.com/view/cn-hk-ip/dibai 在迪拜的大佬们,盒子购买Wi-Fi盒子型号推荐

15 Jul 2026, 05:48 UTC174 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

5G SIM 卡本地Wi-Fi盒子;搭配Wi-Fi盒子(日本IP),两个Wi-Fi信号,独立的,互不影响;菲律宾 越南 柬埔寨 马来 泰国 都可提供

7 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC191 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

疫情开始一直做这个到现在 大佬们放心 专业 专心做好一件事 过多的质疑和不信任是彼此的损耗 信任和快速成交,才能为您带来更好的服务

6 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC164 viewsread 9 August 2026

usdt防骗:1.不泄漏助记词 2.一定不要扫码付款(无论对方以任何理由)

6 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC171 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

大佬们,有人冒充我的号码,仔细看,多了个k,我的飞机号:@fk99k;一定要认准,不要被骗,骗子会玩各种套路。 我的唯一网站是:https://sites.google.com/view/cn-hk-ip/shouye 我有在菲律宾大事件频道长期打广告,骗子是打不起广告的。

27 Jun 2026, 12:27 UTC223 viewsread 9 August 2026

越南可快递配送5G上网卡和5G Wi-Fi盒子,全境配送,三天内到

31 May 2026, 14:31 UTC482 viewsread 9 August 2026

在菲的老板: 设备已经到菲,可派送,到手后接上本地网就可以用。 国内可选IP:广州 上海 青岛 北京 张家口 呼和浩特 乌兰察布 杭州 深圳 河源 成都 重庆 南京 建议:广州 深圳 上海 北京 24小时在线服务飞机:@fk99k

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @fk99k_vip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,107,084 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“回国IP,香港IP, WiFi盒子” (@fk99k_vip), 279 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fk99k_vip.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.