Это нельзя игнорировать! Давайте разберемся как все на самом деле) 💕 lasers fix – главные по гладкости во Владивостоке. Записывайтесь по ссылке - https://n1143890.yclients.com/ ✨

Channel
LASERS FIX
@fix_lasers
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
106subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002659348058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fix_lasers |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fix_lasers |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 106 | +3 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 103 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 105 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 101 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 100 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 99 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 98 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 98 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 38s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
«Кажется, лазерная эпиляция перестала работать…» 😔 Именно эту мысль многие ловят себя после 7–9 процедуры. Но правда в том, что проблема чаще всего не в лазере. Вы настолько привыкли к гладкой коже, что просто… забыли, с чего всё начиналось. Вспомните: ✨ раньше бриться приходилось почти каждый день; ✨ волосы были жёсткими, густыми и быстро отрастали; ✨ раздражение и вросшие волосы были привычной частью ухода. А…
Лазерная эпиляция хороша в любом возрасте 😉🫶🏻
❤1
К тому же действует СКИДКА -70% на первое посещение🔥 👉🏼студия лазерной эпиляции LasersFix в г.Владивосток!
Давайте без красивых обещаний. Есть три уловки, на которые до сих пор попадаются многие клиенты. 1️⃣ «Хватит 6 процедур» Если вам обещают идеальную гладкость всего за 6 сеансов — стоит насторожиться. На практике основной курс лазерной эпиляции чаще всего занимает 8–12 процедур, а затем проводятся поддерживающие сеансы. Всё дело в том, что волосы растут в разных фазах, и за шесть посещений невозможно воздействовать …
Обычная практика для наших мастеров в LASERSFIX 🤣
Перед тем как оценивать результат лазерной эпиляции, важно помнить: на него влияет не только сам аппарат. Имеют значение сразу несколько факторов — особенности ваших волос, соблюдение графика процедур, рекомендации специалиста и, конечно, профессионализм мастера. Листайте карточки и узнайте, какие привычки или ошибки могут замедлять достижение желаемого эффекта →
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @fix_lasers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LASERS FIX” (@fix_lasers), 106 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fix_lasers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.