Как построить дом. Советы Финского Домика pinned a photo

Channel
Как построить дом. Советы Финского Домика
@finskidomik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,992subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001100184693 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @finskidomik |
| Created | Between 1 December 2016 and 31 January 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/finskidomik |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 5,992 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 5,997 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 5,994 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 5,997 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 5,997 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.5%
- avg views ÷ 5,992 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,410
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.74%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (11 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,622 |
| Reactions total | 210 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 18s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
680 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 303 | 44.6% | |
| ❤ | 148 | 21.8% | |
| 💯 | 105 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 7.94% | |
| 😁 | 42 | 6.18% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 2.06% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 1.18% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.294% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.294% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.147% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.147% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 680reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @finskidomik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Приглашаю на практическую бесплатную экскурсию-консультацию Какое то время назад мы делали открытую экскурсию на объект в ЛО. Приехало неожиданно много семей, некоторые были даже из МО. Но тогда мы показывали почти готовый тёплый контур. Это красиво, аккуратно… и, если честно, не так полезно. Потому что главный вопрос у большинства не "как выглядит готовый дом", а "как вообще до него дойти". А с этим сейчас вс…
👍15🔥7💯3❤1
Любопытно, но тема вентиляции, похоже, даже актуальнее, чем само строительство дома. Дом можно построить. А как в нем дышать - вспоминают потом. Первую статью о видах вентиляции я написал более 10 лет назад - она до сих пор актуальна Коротко для тех, кто не читает длинные тексты: 😀 Задача вентиляции - не "проветрить иногда", а постоянно снижать уровень CO2 (в первую очередь от дыхания) и убирать лишнюю влажность,…
👍30❤9💯5😁2👏1
Любопытный феномен. Есть тип "заказчиков", которых легко узнать по первым 10 минутам разговора. Они приходят не строить дом, они приходят… ловить мошенников Причём в их вселенной мошенники - это все. Естественно кроме них самих. Потому что они - на белом коне и в блестящих доспехах и никак иначе. Разговор обычно выглядит так: - Нам нужно 150 подписей, 300 печатей и желательно нотариуса на каждый чих. - а чем в…
💯53👍18🤔6❤3👎2
Что общего между этими двумя фото? На них - одинаковые по готовности дома. Нет фасадов, коммуникаций какой-либо отделки, просто"коробки". Но дальше происходит магия. Не на стройке, а в голове. В первом случае люди говорят: "Недострой… там еще делать и делать". Во втором - те же самые коробки, но уже можно услышать : "Мы построили дом всего за пару миллионов». Видите разницу? Факты и реальность - одинаковые. А …
💯27👍21😁3❤2🔥1🥴1
Как бороться с мышами в каркаснике? Да вот так, по классике 😂 За городом даже у домашних котов, активируются древние гены охотников. Фото от нашего заказчика И да, для хейтеров и "всепропальщиков" - это мыши не из дома, а с участка. Бить надо на подступах 😂 @finskidomik
😁36❤15🔥6🥰1
Разбавлю технические посты. Начали строить один очень интересный дом, разработанный архитектурным бюро RHIZOME 👍 Вообще я давно уже ловлю себя на мысли: типичные скандинавские "сарайки", хотя по прежнему функциональны, оптимальны, рациональны, но... приелись что ли... 12 лет назад, когда мы только начинали, это было что то новенькое, необычное, привлекающее внимание. Сейчас же их стало настолько много, что о…
🔥20👍10❤5👏3
Почему клапаны вентиляции - "так себе решение"? Вижу, что тема вентиляции стала более востребованной. Поэтому повторю пост, написанный еще несколько лет назад. 😁 Одно из популярных и недорогих решений, предлагаемых на рынке - стеновые или оконные приточные клапаны (КИВ-125 и им подобные). К сожалению, толком это решение не работает: вентиляция вроде есть, но так себе. Почему? Постараюсь объяснить по-простому, …
👍31❤9🔥7
Как и обещал, даю шпаргалку по вентиляции. Нормативы воздухообмена сильно разнятся по странам. В РФ они больше, предполагаю, что у нас долгое время фактор энергоэффективности практически не учитывали, а опыт по вентиляции в ИЖС вообще близок к нулю. Поэтому в своей работе мы ориентируемся на финские нормативы: у них большой опыт "частной" вентиляции. Начать стоит с расчёта вашей потребности в притоке и вытяжке. У…
👍46❤13👏10🔥5
Вентиляция - как много в этом слове… 😂 Я уже не раз писал, что считаю нормальную вентиляцию - одной из ключевых систем домашнего комфорта, которой у нас по привычке уделяют второстепенное внимание. Сложность в том, что ты не поймешь кайфа жизни с нормальной вентиляцией, пока не попробуешь. Будет казаться, что это лишнее, можно же окно открыть... Сегодня же речь про другое. Расчет вентиляции для выбора ПВУ (приточ…
👍70❤7🤝2
Несколько лет у нас работала замечательная девушка Даша, которая ранее работала конструктором в СкандиКонстракшн. Сейчас она ушла в поиск новых сфер для себя и сделала классный ИИ ролик для типового проекта ФД - Вилла Нордика 94/112 Как вам? Поддержите автора своими ❤️😊
❤82👍27🔥8😁1
Вчера наш заказчик поднял вопрос технадзора. Поэтому решил повторить то, о чем уже писал. 1) сторонний технадзор - это хорошо 2) лишние глаза на стройке - хорошо. Плохо другое. "технадзор" сейчас - модный и не пыльный бизнес. Ведь технадзорщик ни за что не отвечает. Получил деньги, всех "нагнул" и гордо ушел в закат. При этом он часто видит свою задачу специфически. Показательно вздрючить строителей, чтобы 1…
👍35💯17❤2🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @finskidomik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 633,931 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@finskidomik named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@RussiaBuild · 110,163
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Как построить дом. Советы Финского Домика” (@finskidomik), 5,992 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finskidomik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.