Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Как построить дом. Советы Финского Домика

Channel

Как построить дом. Советы Финского Домика

@finskidomik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,992subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001100184693
TypeChannel
Username@finskidomik
CreatedBetween 1 December 2016 and 31 January 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/finskidomik

Growth

5,9925,9975,994.57 August 2026 — 5,997 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,997 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,994 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,997 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,992 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,991–5,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:045,992-5
13 Aug 2026, 17:165,997+3
10 Aug 2026, 12:125,994-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:025,997no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:185,997first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 5,992 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held12 (11 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total5,622
Reactions total210
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

680 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍30344.6%
14821.8%
💯10515.4%
🔥547.94%
😁426.18%
👏142.06%
🤔81.18%
👎20.294%
🤝20.294%
🥰10.147%
🥴10.147%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 680reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @finskidomik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTCviews —

Как построить дом. Советы Финского Домика pinned a photo

11 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC752 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Приглашаю на практическую бесплатную экскурсию-консультацию Какое то время назад мы делали открытую экскурсию на объект в ЛО. Приехало неожиданно много семей, некоторые были даже из МО. Но тогда мы показывали почти готовый тёплый контур. Это красиво, аккуратно… и, если честно, не так полезно. Потому что главный вопрос у большинства не "как выглядит готовый дом", а "как вообще до него дойти". А с этим сейчас вс

👍15🔥7💯31

10 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC920 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Любопытно, но тема вентиляции, похоже, даже актуальнее, чем само строительство дома. Дом можно построить. А как в нем дышать - вспоминают потом. Первую статью о видах вентиляции я написал более 10 лет назад - она до сих пор актуальна Коротко для тех, кто не читает длинные тексты: 😀 Задача вентиляции - не "проветрить иногда", а постоянно снижать уровень CO2 (в первую очередь от дыхания) и убирать лишнюю влажность,

👍309💯5😁2👏1

4 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC≈1,680 views82 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Любопытный феномен. Есть тип "заказчиков", которых легко узнать по первым 10 минутам разговора. Они приходят не строить дом, они приходят… ловить мошенников Причём в их вселенной мошенники - это все. Естественно кроме них самих. Потому что они - на белом коне и в блестящих доспехах и никак иначе. Разговор обычно выглядит так: - Нам нужно 150 подписей, 300 печатей и желательно нотариуса на каждый чих. - а чем в

💯53👍18🤔63👎2

27 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC≈2,270 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что общего между этими двумя фото? На них - одинаковые по готовности дома. Нет фасадов, коммуникаций какой-либо отделки, просто"коробки". Но дальше происходит магия. Не на стройке, а в голове. В первом случае люди говорят: "Недострой… там еще делать и делать". Во втором - те же самые коробки, но уже можно услышать : "Мы построили дом всего за пару миллионов». Видите разницу? Факты и реальность - одинаковые. А

💯27👍21😁32🔥1🥴1

17 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC≈2,880 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как бороться с мышами в каркаснике? Да вот так, по классике 😂 За городом даже у домашних котов, активируются древние гены охотников. Фото от нашего заказчика И да, для хейтеров и "всепропальщиков" - это мыши не из дома, а с участка. Бить надо на подступах 😂 @finskidomik

😁3615🔥6🥰1

16 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC≈2,830 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Разбавлю технические посты. Начали строить один очень интересный дом, разработанный архитектурным бюро RHIZOME 👍 Вообще я давно уже ловлю себя на мысли: типичные скандинавские "сарайки", хотя по прежнему функциональны, оптимальны, рациональны, но... приелись что ли... 12 лет назад, когда мы только начинали, это было что то новенькое, необычное, привлекающее внимание. Сейчас же их стало настолько много, что о

🔥20👍105👏3

14 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC≈2,260 views47 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Почему клапаны вентиляции - "так себе решение"? Вижу, что тема вентиляции стала более востребованной. Поэтому повторю пост, написанный еще несколько лет назад. 😁 Одно из популярных и недорогих решений, предлагаемых на рынке - стеновые или оконные приточные клапаны (КИВ-125 и им подобные). К сожалению, толком это решение не работает: вентиляция вроде есть, но так себе. Почему? Постараюсь объяснить по-простому,

👍319🔥7

9 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC≈2,380 views74 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как и обещал, даю шпаргалку по вентиляции. Нормативы воздухообмена сильно разнятся по странам. В РФ они больше, предполагаю, что у нас долгое время фактор энергоэффективности практически не учитывали, а опыт по вентиляции в ИЖС вообще близок к нулю. Поэтому в своей работе мы ориентируемся на финские нормативы: у них большой опыт "частной" вентиляции. Начать стоит с расчёта вашей потребности в притоке и вытяжке. У

👍4613👏10🔥5

18 Jun 2026, 07:42 UTC≈2,940 views79 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вентиляция - как много в этом слове… 😂 Я уже не раз писал, что считаю нормальную вентиляцию - одной из ключевых систем домашнего комфорта, которой у нас по привычке уделяют второстепенное внимание. Сложность в том, что ты не поймешь кайфа жизни с нормальной вентиляцией, пока не попробуешь. Будет казаться, что это лишнее, можно же окно открыть... Сегодня же речь про другое. Расчет вентиляции для выбора ПВУ (приточ

👍707🤝2

16 Jun 2026, 06:25 UTC≈2,950 views118 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Несколько лет у нас работала замечательная девушка Даша, которая ранее работала конструктором в СкандиКонстракшн. Сейчас она ушла в поиск новых сфер для себя и сделала классный ИИ ролик для типового проекта ФД - Вилла Нордика 94/112 Как вам? Поддержите автора своими ❤️😊

82👍27🔥8😁1

11 Jun 2026, 09:19 UTC≈4,120 views56 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вчера наш заказчик поднял вопрос технадзора. Поэтому решил повторить то, о чем уже писал. 1) сторонний технадзор - это хорошо 2) лишние глаза на стройке - хорошо. Плохо другое. "технадзор" сейчас - модный и не пыльный бизнес. Ведь технадзорщик ни за что не отвечает. Получил деньги, всех "нагнул" и гордо ушел в закат. При этом он часто видит свою задачу специфически. Показательно вздрючить строителей, чтобы 1

👍35💯172🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @finskidomik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 633,931 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Строительство и бизнес
@RussiaBuild · 110,163
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Как построить дом. Советы Финского Домика” (@finskidomik), 5,992 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finskidomik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.