11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,491–10,638 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 20:45
10,508
-22
14 Aug 2026, 10:38
10,530
-19
13 Aug 2026, 04:58
10,549
-14
12 Aug 2026, 01:32
10,563
-8
11 Aug 2026, 01:51
10,571
-2
10 Aug 2026, 03:41
10,573
-9
9 Aug 2026, 04:11
10,582
-15
8 Aug 2026, 04:04
10,597
-11
7 Aug 2026, 05:28
10,608
-13
6 Aug 2026, 10:15
10,621
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:51
10,621
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 05s
Average length
1m 37s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
103 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
72
69.9%
👍
18
17.5%
🔥
10
9.71%
😁
3
2.91%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 8 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @finlituzb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 1 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Tanishing — Fazilat Kariyeva!
O‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti talabasi, xalqaro yoshlar tashabbuslarining faol ishtirokchisi, Global Money Week doirasida o‘tkazilgan FinLit Network Awards 2025 tanlovining "Eng yaxshi spiker" nominatsiyasi g‘olibi hamda FinTalk sahnasida minglab yoshlarni ilhomlantirgan spiker.
#FinLitNetwork #FinTalk #FinLitNetworkAwards2025 #GlobalMoneyWeek #FinancialLiteracy #YouthL…
2025-yil davomida FinLit Network yuzlab yoshlarni birlashtirdi.
500 dan ortiq ishtirokchilar.
20 dan ortiq spikerlar.
O‘nlab uchrashuvlar va loyihalar.
Lekin FinLit Network'ni raqamlar bilan ifodalab bo‘lmaydi.
Bu film — bir yil davomida ushbu loyihaga qancha mehnat, qancha ishonch va qancha qalb qo‘yilganini ko‘rsatadi.
Qolganini esa keling, birgalikda tomosha qilamiz 😊
🌙 Qurbon hayiti muborak bo‘lsin!
FinLit jamoasi ushbu ulug‘ ayyomda barchangizga tinchlik, mehr-oqibat va xonadonlaringizga fayz-u baraka tilaydi.
Bu bayram qalblarga yorug‘lik, oilalarga totuvlik, hayotimizga esa ezgu niyatlar olib kelsin.
✨ Bayramingiz muborak bo‘lsin!
Global Money Week 2026 doirasida FinLit Network hamda Kapitalbank hamkorligida yoshlar uchun navbatdagi uchrashuv tashkil etildi 🚀
Tadbirda bank sektori, ta’lim va biznes yo‘nalishidagi turli tashkilot vakillari spiker sifatida ishtirok etib, talabalar bilan moliyaviy tafakkur, kasbiy rivojlanish, zamonaviy iqtisodiyot va yoshlar imkoniyatlari haqida o‘z tajriba va fikrlari bilan bo‘lishdi.
Tadbirning keyingi qismi…
Bugun Jahon iqtisodiyoti va diplomatiya universitetida 9-sonli FinTalk bo‘lib o‘tdi 🚀
3 nafar spiker o‘z mavzulari bilan sahnaga chiqib, real tajriba va fikrlari bilan bo‘lishdi.
-“33 mln so‘mga qanday biznes qilsa bo‘ladi?” degan savolga esa talabalar tayyor g‘oyalar bilan javob berdi 🧐
“Micro Project Talk” doirasida 4 ta jamoa biznes-reja tuzib, o‘zaro challenge qildi — kredit, strategiya, xarajat va daromad hiso…
Joriy yilning 4-may kuni “Zakovat Arena”da O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Markaziy banki hamda “Uzcard” milliy to‘lov tizimi hamkorligida “Global Money Week – 2026” xalqaro kampaniyasi doirasida “Zakovat” intellektual o‘yini tashkil etildi. Mazkur tadbirda “Moliyaviy savodxonlik ambassadorlari” loyihasi ambassadorlari hamda respublikadagi noqtisodiy yo‘nalishdagi oliy ta’lim muassasalari talabalari ishtirok etdilar.
Intell…
🕊️ Bugun biz yurtimiz tinchligi va farovonligi yo‘lida fidokorona xizmat qilgan insonlarni chuqur hurmat bilan eslaymiz.
✨ Qahramonlar xotirasi doimo qalblarimizda yashaydi. Ularning jasorati va matonati barchamiz uchun ibratdir.
9-may — Xotira va qadrlash kuni muborak bo‘lsin! 🇺🇿
🚀@finlituzb_ru
4-may kuni Global Money Week 2026 doirasida Zakovat intellektual turniri bo‘lib o‘tdi. 🏆
Markaziy bank, UZCARD, Ipoteka Bank OTP Group va Uzumbank hamkorligida tashkil etilgan tadbir bilim, jamoaviy ruh va sog‘lom raqobatni bir maydonda birlashtirdi.
Turnirda noiqtisodiy yo‘nalishdagi oliy ta’lim muassasalaridan “Moliyaviy savodxonlik ambassadorlari” loyihasi vakillari, shuningdek, moliyaviy savodxonlik kurslarini …
❤10
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @finlituzb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 29,645 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Finlit.uz - moliyaviy savodxonlik” (@finlituzb), 10,508 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finlituzb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
