Channel
@finikospace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
59subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001675356396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @finikospace |
| Description | Бизнес-проект Марата Сабирова |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 3 November 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/finikospace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 59 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 59 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
77 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 11 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 14.3% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 11.7% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 9.09% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 7.79% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 7.79% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 5.19% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2022 to 30 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Случилась классическая история. 1️⃣Организаторы Финико отжали денег у людей, наняли себе охранников не из тех, кто много умеет и много знает, а из тех кто пиарился в инсте «на геликах» в стиле смотры с мажоркой (если кто помнит что это такое). 2️⃣«Высокопрофессиональная» охрана была замечена в организации проблем, для последующего победоносного их решения, как часть мероприятий по дойке любимой коровы, за что их по…
👏3👍1
Специально для тех, кому удобней посмотреть выпуск в телеграмм. @whySKAM
Продолжаем про космос?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⚡2
Всем привет! На связи Марат.
🔥5🐳2🍾1
Отключусь все же на пару дней. Произошла оплошность. Надо перезагрузить мозг.
👌3❤🔥2⚡1
Новый подход - интеллектуальная генерация прибыли. Что думаете?
🤩7🐳1
Аналитика от Зыгмунта Престижный журнал Forbes в 2022 году насчитал всего 2668 миллиардеров. Из-за пандемии их число сокращается который год подряд, а теперь снизится еще больше. Однако, имея миллиарды, за 20 лет коммерческих полетов в космосе 🪐 побывало от силы пара десятков богачей. Как профессиональные инвесторы, мы с вами понимаем, почему. Стоимость серьезной космической экспедиции на МКС - $55 млн. Чтобы капи…
🐳3👍3
Друзья! Анализирую ваши космические предположения. С чем-то согласен, с чем-то - нет. Приведу свои соображения и доводы в ближайшее время. Нам нужны максимальные иксы. Будем стремиться к ним 💪 На связи 🪐
👍4
Какое направление, по-вашему, принесет больше космических иксов? ☄️
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍3❤🔥2🐳2🍾1
Доброе утро, партнеры! Вижу, что не все оптимистичны и верят в инвестиции в космическую сферу. Однако, отличная новость в том, что таких только половина 😊 Другая половина продемонстрировала крепкую деловую хватку и тонкую бизнес-интуицию. Это радует. Давайте двигаться дальше. Подумаем вместе о про перспективы разных космических отраслей?
👏4🐳2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @finikospace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Продолжаем про космос?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какое направление, по-вашему, принесет больше космических иксов? ☄️
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❓Вы были в планетарии?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Друзья! Верите ли вы в космические 🚀 перспективы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2022 to 30 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Finiko Space 💵🚀” (@finikospace), 59 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finikospace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.