較早前本頻道提過嘅火燒噴熔布測試 經過k kwong提及 係無用嘅! 係無用嘅! 係無用嘅! 因此,本頻道現作出更正,並謹此致歉 #唔好意思炒咗車 #有錯就要認 #無下次
Channel
問題口罩資料庫 (口罩及衛生用品供應狀況情報頻道 附屬頻道)
@findmasks_badmask
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
456subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001426909812 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @findmasks_badmask |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 12 February 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/findmasks_badmask |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 456 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 457 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 458 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 459 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 459 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 February 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
無論喺口罩谷定係喺 @collectmaskbot Admin都察覺到近排開始多咗唔少假口罩出現 亦都發現假口罩愈嚟愈防不勝防 其實要知道一個口罩有無防疫功能,自己都仲有方法check嘅 K Kwong喺facebook有教過人手測試 雖然唔會知真BFE PFE,但至少有個譜嘅 https://www.facebook.com/11383432157/posts/10157991314097158/?d=n 另外都有出過其他post教分真假口罩 https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10157985844962158&id=11383432157
#手足報料 劣罩愈出愈真,係時間update下新嘅 假罩黑罩廢罩劣罩系列 1. 一葉川/岡本裕/Ex-Proshield:發行商為香港公司森川實業,有兩次賣偽日罩記錄,信用破產 2. JTK:華發宣稱與Medicom合作推出JTK口罩,Medicom發出嚴正聲明指並無與華發有任何合作關係,JTK亦非Medicom其下產品 3. Bitoway:有jhpia印章,翻查jhpia member list,只有一間叫Bito Co.既公司係member,未知是否同一間。唯Bito Co.本身是大陸人開設的公司。另外Bitoway亦於淘寶有售。 4. 盜版Navis(Product Code: 7-8350-02):Navis原為日本上市公司ASONE旗下衛生製品系列,品質有保證,但近日其中一款型號(7-8350-02)出現假貨。該系列其餘型號暫未發現盜版。
https://www.thestandnews.com/society/%E5%9B%9B%E6%AC%BE%E5%A4%96%E7%A7%91%E5%8F%A3%E7%BD%A9%E5%90%AB%E8%8F%8C%E9%87%8F%E8%B6%85%E6%A8%99-%E6%B5%B7%E9%97%9C%E7%B1%B2%E9%A6%AC%E4%B8%8A%E5%81%9C%E7%94%A8-4-%E5%90%8D%E8%97%A5%E6%88%BF%E8%B2%A0%E8%B2%AC%E4%BA%BA%E8%A2%AB%E6%8D%95/ Admin: 雖然係old news,不過都擺喺度for reference啦
28) 品牌:三次元口罩(藍色包裝) 問題原因:疑似假貨
問題口罩資料庫 (口罩及衛生用品供應狀況情報頻道 附屬頻道) pinned «下列都係有問題既口罩,但缺乏照片,希望手足可以提供 Disposable mask:中國製,無認證/標準 Fujinap(翻版) :大陸製口罩,阿里巴巴有批發,10蚊盒,真假成疑***網民反映:Fujinap真口罩係獨立包裝白色口罩 GIDCARE:印尼產,有官網,但見唔到有過濾標準 Hanwood:無產地,無標準+認證,網上查找屬礦產公司,而且包裝盒口罩顏色與盒內顏色不同,更有受污染的情況,疑二手口罩 Medisuper:生產地不明,有官網,但盒上舊官網已失效,有用戶反映盒發黃,冇製造日期, ASTM…»
27) 品牌:OneMed 問題原因:有官網,印尼公司,BFE>99%認證,有廠商qc,印尼製
26) 品牌:SARAYA(翻版) 問題原因:大陸製,日文包裝,有人表示使用後面起粒粒
25) 品牌:Doctor Mask 問題原因:大陸口罩,日文包裝,阿里巴巴有批發
24) 品牌:山本 問題原因:無產地,日文包裝,無認證/標準,有黑點,污染物情況,另用家反映改款產品的正版應是“松本”,包裝相似
下列都係有問題既口罩,但缺乏照片,希望手足可以提供 Disposable mask:中國製,無認證/標準 Fujinap(翻版) :大陸製口罩,阿里巴巴有批發,10蚊盒,真假成疑***網民反映:Fujinap真口罩係獨立包裝白色口罩 GIDCARE:印尼產,有官網,但見唔到有過濾標準 Hanwood:無產地,無標準+認證,網上查找屬礦產公司,而且包裝盒口罩顏色與盒內顏色不同,更有受污染的情況,疑二手口罩 Medisuper:生產地不明,有官網,但盒上舊官網已失效,有用戶反映盒發黃,冇製造日期, ASTM 認證,bfe達97%以上 Kaicare:中國製,無認證資料,報稱有臭味 health mask:有泰文,無產地,認證/標準,製造日期. health protection:藥房有賣,無過濾率,標準,網上沒有資料. Longmed+:穿越時空口罩(假日期) MFG 03/2020,疑泰國製,只有BFE等級,「未來口罩」一事更新,…
23) 品牌:日兔神 問題原因:中國製,有人報稱兩盒出現唔同款既口罩,一款薄啲,寫住1A,另一款就厚啲無寫字
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @findmasks_badmask. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@findmasks_badmask named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“問題口罩資料庫 (口罩及衛生用品供應狀況情報頻道 附屬頻道)” (@findmasks_badmask), 456 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/findmasks_badmask.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.