Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Твои Финансы и Маркетинг | Карьера

@finansi_marketing

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,381subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001444777620
TypeChannel
Username@finansi_marketing
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/finansi_marketing

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@finansi_marketing/1703 · this entry12 Nov 2025, 20:29 UTC@jenskiy_biznes/167013 Nov 2025, 19:30 UTC1.0023 hours
@jenskiy_biznes/167114 Nov 2025, 16:58 UTC@finansi_marketing/1705 · this entry14 Nov 2025, 20:22 UTC1.003.4 hours
@finansi_marketing/1708 · this entry17 Nov 2025, 19:50 UTC@jenskiy_biznes/167619 Nov 2025, 17:47 UTC1.0046 hours
@jenskiy_biznes/167518 Nov 2025, 17:23 UTC@finansi_marketing/1709 · this entry18 Nov 2025, 19:23 UTC1.002.0 hours
@finansi_marketing/1710 · this entry19 Nov 2025, 20:37 UTC@jenskiy_biznes/167720 Nov 2025, 18:53 UTC1.0022 hours
@finansi_marketing/1715 · this entry24 Nov 2025, 20:39 UTC@jenskiy_biznes/168326 Nov 2025, 16:32 UTC1.0044 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@jenskiy_biznes9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9918 hoursthis entry (63)
@forex_invest_tg6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 hourseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 November 2025 to 27 November 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @forex_invest_tg. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

11,38111,38411,382.56 August 2026 — 11,384 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,384 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,383 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,381 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,381–11,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:5611,381-2
10 Aug 2026, 19:1211,383-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:5411,384no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:1511,384first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

30 Nov 2025, 19:05 UTC≈8,080 viewsread 12 August 2026

Канал временно не обслуживается, за рекламой обращаться к действующему сотруднику на других каналах @artrecpromo

29 Nov 2025, 20:16 UTC≈8,830 viewsread 12 August 2026

Канал временно не обслуживается, за рекламой обращаться к действующему сотруднику на других каналах @artrecpromo

28 Nov 2025, 18:37 UTC≈8,520 viewsread 12 August 2026

Канал временно не обслуживается, за рекламой обращаться к действующему сотруднику на других каналах @artrecpromo

27 Nov 2025, 12:48 UTC≈8,630 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Binance Japan и PayPay запустили новый сервис для криптоторговли Binance Japan и PayPay Corporation запустили новый сервис, благодаря которому пользователи могут приобретать криптоактивы с помощью PayPay Money напрямую через платформу спотовой торговли. Ранее операции с цифровыми активами в рамках спотовой торговли на Binance в Японии были ограничены переводами в иенах через внутренние банковские счета или депозита

25 Nov 2025, 20:08 UTC≈8,430 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Гонконг запускает пилотный проект токенизированного депозита с транзакциями на реальную сумму Валютное управление Гонконга запустило пилотную фазу проекта Ensemble для тестирования транзакций с реальной стоимостью с использованием токенизированных депозитов и цифровых активов. Новый этап переводит инициативу Project Ensemble из стадии эксперимента в «песочнице» в плоскость реального, ценностно-ориентированного урегу

24 Nov 2025, 20:39 UTC≈8,320 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Polkadot DAO ограничивает предложение DOT до 2,1 миллиарда Polkadot DAO осуществила самое заметное экономическое изменение за всю свою историю. 18 октября 2025 года аккаунт Polkadot объявил о плане ограничить общее количество DOT до 2,1 миллиарда и сокращать дальнейшую эмиссию вдвое каждые два года, начиная с 14 марта 2026 года. Этот гигантский оборот является отражением халвинга биткоина. Polkadot способен управля

23 Nov 2025, 18:42 UTC≈8,600 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Portage Biotech и другие DAT-компании сфокусировались на развитии DeSci Биомедицинские и научные компании все активнее обращаются к блокчейну и стратегиям управления криптоказначействами для финансирования исследований. Так они меняют традиционные модели привлечения капитала и распределения грантов, которые порой откладывают появление жизненно важных методов лечения на десятилетия. В сентябре биомедицинская компани

22 Nov 2025, 20:31 UTC≈8,680 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Создатели Aztec анонсировали продажу токена: сообщество критикует масштабный сбор средств Продажа токена AZTEC официально стартовала, и проект представил ее как полностью открытую и ориентированную на сообщество. Команда заявила, что аукцион построен на механизмах честного распределения, использующих инфраструктуру Uniswap и нулевое знание для защиты приватности. Начальная цена актива задает нижний порог в 350 млн п

21 Nov 2025, 17:33 UTC≈8,780 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Запуск Allora спровоцировал всплеск критики из-за распределения токенов и обвинений в обмане комьюнити Проект Allora, ставший эволюцией Upshot и запустивший свой основной продукт и токен ALLO на этой неделе, оказался в центре негативного информационного потока. Эксперты CoinFund опубликовали подробный разбор, объяснив, почему компания инвестировала в проект. Еще в 2021 году команда создавала уникальный механизм оцен

20 Nov 2025, 20:28 UTC≈8,280 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Разработчики представили токен ZAMA и анонсировали дорожную карту проекта Компания Zama объявила о скором запуске токена ZAMA, который станет ключевым элементом Zama Confidential Blockchain Protocol. Криптоактив будет использоваться для оплаты комиссий, связанных с конфиденциальными операциями и обработкой зашифрованных данных. В проект заложена модель burn-and-mint, которая формирует баланс между сжиганием криптова

19 Nov 2025, 20:37 UTC≈8,690 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

NFT-коллекция Lil Fogees усиливает интерес к экосистеме Fogo Эксперты TK Research объяснили: проект Fogo представляет собой блокчейн уровня Layer-1, работающий на Solana Virtual Machine и оптимизированный под высокую пропускную способность. Его цель — обеспечить торговый опыт, сопоставимый с централизованными площадками (CEX), сохраняя при этом прозрачность и возможности децентрализованных финансов (DeFi). Команда п

18 Nov 2025, 19:23 UTC≈8,860 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Акции Nvidia демонстрируют «самый большой зелёный флаг» В то время как американский полупроводниковый гигант Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) готовится к публикации отчета о доходах за третий квартал 19 ноября, акции компании демонстрируют необычайную силу, что, вероятно, приведет к достижению рекордного максимума в 250 долларов. В связи с этим анализ, проведённый графической платформой TrendSpider в посте в X от 9 ноября, по

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @finansi_marketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,082,402 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Твои Финансы и Маркетинг | Карьера” (@finansi_marketing), 11,381 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finansi_marketing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.