Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

שלמה פילבר Shlomo Filber

@filbers

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

7,223subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001678362805
TypeChannel
Username@filbers
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/filbers

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,1867,2237,204.56 August 2026 — 7,186 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,186 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,219 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,223 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,180–7,229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:247,223+4
9 Aug 2026, 18:427,219+33
6 Aug 2026, 18:007,186no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:237,186first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
113.7%
avg views ÷ 7,223 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,210
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (19 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total57,500
Reactions total1,253
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30m 32s
Average length
6m 06s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,922 reactions across 22 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,16444.0%
1,12222.8%
👌2945.97%
💔2935.95%
👏2274.61%
🔥1523.09%
💩1452.95%
😭771.56%
😁751.52%
🤮701.42%
🏆611.24%
💯571.16%
🙏541.10%
🤡230.467%
😐180.366%
😢170.345%
🫡160.325%
👎140.284%
🖕90.183%
🥱80.163%
8 further kinds260.528%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,922reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC≈3,730 views207 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💩116😁52🤮21👍9👎53😢1

Signed שלמה פילבר

7 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC≈13,700 views379 reactionsread 12 August 2026

השנקל שלי על סדרת הראיונות שייתן הערב יואב הורביץ בשלושת הערוצים. 1. יואב איש נעים, כיפי, ישראלי, פטריוט שבאמת אוהב את המדינה. ותקופה של כשנתיים היינו גם חברים טובים, כששנינו עבדנו במקום הכי חשוב, הכי אכזרי, והכי כפוי טובה במדינת ישראל - לשכת רה"מ של אחד שקוראים לו בנימין נתניהו. 2. כשיואב נכנס - הוא עבר, כמו כולנו, את הזובור הנבזי האכזרי הראשון של מי שמעז ללכת לעבוד עם נתניהו. אני קיבלתי אותו אז, בדברי העידוד שמופ

👍27279😐11🔥7👎3😱3👌2👏1

Signed שלמה פילבר

30 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC≈6,490 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍5215

Signed שלמה פילבר

30 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC≈6,330 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026

מיהו שמאלני? תלוי אם שואלים את השמאל או את הימין

🔥58👌234💩1

Signed שלמה פילבר

30 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC≈6,550 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

76👍29💩3

Signed שלמה פילבר

17 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC≈10,600 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

כל אחד אוהב את ה"שיווין בנטל" שלו אחרת. איך מפרש כל מחנה פוליטי מה צריך להיות סדר העדיפות במימוש השיוויון בנטל.

👍11510💩5

Signed שלמה פילבר

16 Jul 2026, 06:46 UTC≈10,100 views276 reactionsread 12 August 2026

שיעור על חובבנות ואינטרסים בפוליטיקה ובמנדטים. בשבוע האחרון פתאום ש"ס הפכה לנושא החם בפוליטיקה, ובאופן מפתיע גם "החלה להתרסק" בסקרים. מה הסיפור? אז ככה, התקשורת והפרשנים עסוקים באובססיביות כבר שלוש שנים בניסיונות לפרק ולקרוע חלקים מגוש הימין. השבוע הם הגיעו לש"ס. אחרי שלוש שנים שבהם ניסו: - לפצל 6 ח"כים מהליכוד (גלנט, אדלשטיין, ביטן, דלל, שרן השכל, אילוז), ונכשלו. - לפצל את הציונות הדתית ולהעביר לבנט חלקים ממנה,

👍181👌48🤡1914😁12🤯2

Signed שלמה פילבר

12 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC≈9,980 views343 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BenYanivVideo

🚨📺 הסנאטור גראהם בריאיון המרכזי האחרון שלו: ✍️ ⁠אם עסקת איראן תיכשל, טראמפ יכבוש את מצר הורמוז בכוח ויגבה עמלות. ✍️ ⁠אם איראן תערער עליה או תתקוף באמצעות שליחים, ארה"ב "תמחק" אותם. ✍️ ⁠והדחיפה הדיפלומטית הבאה תהיה להכניס את סעודיה להסכמי אברהם כדי לעצב מחדש את האזור כולו. הוא לא יזכה לראות איך זה יסתיים. ייתכן שהוא פשוט סיפר לנו בדיוק כיצד 🙏🏼

💔29332😢15🙏3

Signed שלמה פילבר

12 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC≈8,280 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026

יהי זכרו ברוך.

😭778😢1

Signed שלמה פילבר

12 Jul 2026, 06:08 UTC≈7,730 views183 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

אין 'גוש שלישי' ואין 'גוש אחדות'. יש 7 מנדטים שזזו ימינה ומחפשים מפלגה שמתאימה להם - מפלגת מרכז שתצטרף לגוש נתניהו. אבל כל הפוליטיקאים שמחזרים אחריהם לא מוכנים להתחייב להם לכך. ולכן כולם ממשיכים להסתובב סביב הזנב של עצמם.

94👍68💯16😁5

Signed שלמה פילבר

10 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC≈15,900 views396 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

סופ"ש סקרים ושאלה לכל ה"פרשנים". תסבירו - למה כ -6-8 מנדטים של הליכודניקים שלטענכם "עברו לגוש האופוזיציה" מתעקשים להישאר דווקא אצל בנט כאשר כל האחרים בורחים ממנו לאיזנקוט? תביטו בגרף למטה - סקר ערוץ 14 אתמול מול ממוצע ***כל הסוקרים*** - כפי שמופיע באתר המדד (ותודה ל@rosnersdomain). הסקרים דומים לגמרי בכל המפלגות. ההבדל הוא רק בין הליכוד לבנט. ב@C14_news בנט אתמול עמד על 8 והליכוד על 33, ובכל שאר הסקרים בנט על 15-16,

👍29544👌24👏19🤮7🤔3🤣2🤯1

Signed שלמה פילבר

8 Jul 2026, 04:44 UTC≈6,820 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍71🙏63👏2🥱1

Signed שלמה פילבר

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @filbers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 235,097 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q12411779 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelShlomo Filber
DescriptionIsraeli manager
X / Twitter@filbers

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“שלמה פילבר Shlomo Filber” (@filbers), 7,223 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filbers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.