Channel
@fiikriyya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
167subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003570762834 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fiikriyya |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fiikriyya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 167 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 167 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 994 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
34 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
He was an imam of Ahl as-Sunnah, someone we speak of with such reverence and rightly. This is why reading the seerah and biographies of those who came before us matters greatly, beyond just historical interest. These weren’t distant, invincible figures. They were people who held firm when it would have been so much easier not to, and their example is still something we can reach for today. When our own tests are, al…
❤5
Before moving on to how the madhab developed, it’s worth mentioning that writing pieces like this and reading about the trial that Imam Ahmad went through is difficult. There’s a difference between knowing, abstractly, that Imam Ahmad رحمه الله went through the Mihna, and actually going through the details of it.
New post 🌟 https://open.substack.com/pub/fikriyya/p/imam-ahmad-and-the-mihna-part-ii?r=fu3u5&utm_medium=ios
Ali ibn al-Madini said afterward that Allah had honored the religion through two men, with no third: Abu Bakr on the day of the Apostasy, and Ahmad ibn Hanbal on the day of the Mihna. Bishr ibn al-Harith summarized what the trial revealed about him: “Ibn Hanbal was put into the furnace, and came out gold.”
🔖 Facts About Imam Ahmad & the Mihna ➡️The Mihna began in 218 AH, when Caliph al-Ma’mun ordered scholars across Baghdad tested on whether the Qur’an was created: a position rejected by Ahl as-Sunnah. ➡️When a large group of fuqaha and muhaddithun, including Imam Ahmad, were tested, nearly everyone eventually complied under pressure. Only four held out at first: Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Sajjada, al-Qawariri, and Muhammad i…
🔖 Imam Ahmad Was an Imam in Every Field Imam as-Shafi’i said that Imam Ahmad was an imam in eight distinct fields: the Qur’an, the Sunnah, hadith, fiqh, asceticism, poverty, cautious piety, and the Arabic language. Imam Ahmad had numerous writings other than Musnad Ahmad. These include: كتاب فضائل الصحابة كتاب الأشربة كتاب الورع الرد على الزنادقة و الجهمية أصول السنة كتاب الزهد علل الحديث ومعرفة الرجال كتاب…
❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا كُونُوا قَوَّامِينَ بِالْقِسْطِ شُهَدَاءَ لِلَّهِ وَلَوْ عَلَىٰ أَنفُسِكُمْ أَوِ الْوَالِدَيْنِ وَالْأَقْرَبِينَ "O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm in justice, witnesses for Allah, even if it be against yourselves or parents and relatives." [4:135] Justice is an obligation, owed even when the one committing the wrong is close to us. And our beloved Prophet ﷺ was a …
❤4
This has been lost amongst many, thinking that a) Islam allows for oppression to happen and is overlooked, and b) that they need to resort to other ideologies outside of Islam for justice. Islam is comprehensive, and the Shari’ah is sufficient for mankind. Justice, mercy, accountability, and the rights owed to women are already legislated in the texts and worked out across centuries of fiqh. The starting question for…
❤4
One of the first things you learn when studying the religion (or introduction to fiqh) is the Maqasid al-Shariah (the objectives of Islamic law). They are the goals that Allah, the Legislator, has set. Allah, exalted is He, did not create this universe in vain nor leave it without purpose. He created mankind to worship Him alone, with no partner, and created this universe to facilitate and ease the performance of thi…
❤6
A slight break from what I usually discuss on here and from the previous posts. This week I read an essay on Substack from a girl who wrote about her experience losing faith in Islam's regard for women, mainly using her lived experiences and witnessed abuses to the conclusion that no religion, including her own (Islam), genuinely cares about women, and grappling with the guilt and fear of admitting that. You can rea…
❤5
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fiikriyya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 639,016 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فكرية” (@fiikriyya), 167 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fiikriyya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.