Channel
@fiddasim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,671subscribers
-68 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001746072896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fiddasim |
| Description | Uzoqdagi yaqiningiz ) Bilaman hislaringiz hislarimga juda yaqin 🤍 •Bu yerda ruhan o’sish imkonyati mavjud. Biz bilan bog’lanish: @Fiddarobot Hamkorlik : @fidda_rek Biznesim : @fiddastore. “Ayfa” brend asoschisi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fiddasim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 4,671 | -47 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 4,718 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 4,739 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (28 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 32,289 |
| Reactions total | 1,163 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,163 reactions across 24 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 340 | 29.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 259 | 22.3% | |
| 💯 | 186 | 16.0% | |
| 💔 | 132 | 11.3% | |
| 🔥 | 123 | 10.6% | |
| 🥰 | 123 | 10.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fiddasim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Tark etsang - yuraging, ko'zing va xotiralaring bilan tark et! Ortga o'girilma! O'girilish alamni yangilaydi. Lek hech foyda bermaydi, yo'qotganingni qaytarmaydi. Ayman Yog'iy
💔28❤12💯10🔥1
𝑶’𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒓𝒂𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒚𝒎𝒊? Ulgurdizmi qo’shilishga 🌟 𝑴𝒂𝒚𝒍𝒊 𝒚𝒂𝒏𝒂 5 𝒅𝒐𝒏𝒂 𝒐𝒅𝒂𝒎 𝒒𝒐’𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒃 𝒐𝒍𝒔𝒊𝒏 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈..🌟
𝐵𝑒𝑘𝑜𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑖 𝑘𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑛 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑘𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑚𝑖 𝑆𝑖𝑧𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑐ℎ𝑢𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑓𝑎𝑎𝑡 𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑢𝑣𝑐ℎ𝑖 𝑘𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖 𝑏𝑖𝑟 𝑠𝑎ℎ𝑖𝑓𝑎𝑔𝑎 𝑗𝑎𝑚𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑘． 🤍𝑨𝒓𝒂𝒃 𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒊𝒛 𝒓𝒖𝒔 𝒕𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒏 𝒎𝒖𝒕𝒍𝒂𝒒𝒐 𝒃𝒆𝒑𝒖𝒍 𝒅𝒂𝒓𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒓 😍𝑶𝒔𝒉𝒙𝒐𝒏𝒂 𝒒𝒊𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒂 𝒂𝒚𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒛 𝒖𝒄𝒉𝒖𝒏 𝒌𝒖𝒏𝒍𝒊𝒌 𝒃𝒆𝒑𝒖𝒍 𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒔𝒆𝒑𝒕𝒍𝒂𝒓 📚𝑲𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒃𝒔𝒆𝒗𝒂𝒓𝒍𝒂𝒓 𝒖𝒄𝒉𝒖𝒏 𝒃𝒊𝒓 𝒌𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒂 𝒃𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒂 𝒌𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒃 𝒐’𝒒𝒊𝒃 𝒕𝒖𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒉 𝒔𝒊𝒓𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒊 🌟 𝑲𝒂𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒗𝒂 𝒃𝒍𝒐𝒈 𝒚𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒉 𝒅𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒎𝒂𝒅𝒈𝒂 𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒃 𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒒𝒊𝒔𝒉 𝒃𝒐’𝒚𝒊𝒄𝒉𝒂 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒙𝒂𝒕𝒍𝒂𝒓 🩷𝑻𝒖𝒓𝒇𝒂 𝒙𝒊𝒍 𝒌𝒐𝒏𝒌𝒖𝒓𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒏 𝒋𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒚𝒍 𝒉𝒂𝒅𝒊𝒚𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒓 𝑂’𝑧 𝑦𝑜’𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑖 𝑜𝑟
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Doim siz hohlagandaka bo’lmaydi…
🥰11❤7💯5❤🔥2💔1
Bir qiz oshiqcha summa o’tkazgan ekan bizga aloqa chiqqandilar, pulini qaytarib berdik Hozirgi summa quyidagicha Kim yordam qilish uchun pul tashlagan bo’lsa Alloh o’rnini to’ldirib qo’ysin.
❤3
Shu yerni o’qing, oxirgacha…
💔2
Karta holati Insha Alloh 1-2 kunda yig’ib bersak in shaaa Alloh u ayolga ham yaxshi bo’lardi, faqat ehson ramazonda qilinmaydiku togrimi? 10.000 yoki 20.000 dan qilsak ham bir kunda yig’ilib qolarkan.
❤5
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥13💯7🥰5💔4❤3
Assalomu aleykum va rohmatulloh. Qizlar Farg’onalik qizlar bor a kanalimda? Bir qizga yordam kerak ekan banisaga Kecha joylashganim uchun javob bera olmayotgandim lichkalarga eri vafot etganiga 8 oy bo’libti farzandi kichikroq bo’lgani uchun bog’chaga joylab ishga chiqmoqchi ekan. Atrofdan ham biroz qarzlari bor ekan shuning uchun Farg’onalik qizlar bo’lsa ayollar uchun bo’sh ish o’rinlarini bilsangiz @fiddarobot ga…
❤14💯8❤🔥3🥰3
🤍
❤🔥35❤9🥰9🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @fiddasim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 672,387 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фидда.” (@fiddasim), 4,671 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fiddasim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.