Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ficbook News

Channel

Ficbook News

@ficbook_news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,467subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001535915481
TypeChannel
Username@ficbook_news
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ficbook_news

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,4604,5094,484.57 August 2026 — 4,483 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,488 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,509 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,502 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,503 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,501 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,498 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,497 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,492 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,490 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,470 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,460 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,461 subscribers18 September 2026 — 4,467 subscribers4,4677 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,453–4,516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:584,467+6
14 Sept 2026, 15:194,461+1
10 Sept 2026, 19:004,460-10
5 Sept 2026, 13:414,470-20
1 Sept 2026, 15:274,490-2
29 Aug 2026, 11:544,492-5
26 Aug 2026, 14:234,497-1
23 Aug 2026, 16:444,498-3
19 Aug 2026, 19:164,501-2
16 Aug 2026, 21:264,503+1
13 Aug 2026, 16:374,502-7
10 Aug 2026, 23:434,509+21
8 Aug 2026, 00:554,488+5
7 Aug 2026, 15:464,483first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,924 reactions across 20 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
75525.8%
😭39413.5%
👍2829.64%
💔2488.48%
🙏2488.48%
👎2257.69%
🥰1635.57%
😢1324.51%
🤬1043.56%
🤯953.25%
👀571.95%
🔥361.23%
🫡311.06%
❤‍🔥301.03%
😐240.821%
😡170.581%
🤔150.513%
🕊120.41%
110.376%
💋80.274%
12 further kinds371.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,924 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,360 views129 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если у вас Android и вы пользуетесь приложением, проверьте обновления: в новой версии баг с обрезанными буквами и ориентацией, которая не фиксируется, должны были быть исправлены.

👍8324👀7👎7🔥7❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC≈1,710 views180 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я заметила неполадки в работе Фикбука — как минимум периодически медленная загрузка. Возможно, DDoS.

😢12827💔9🤬94😱2🤷‍♀1

28 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,900 views148 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кажется, в комментариях возникла путаница. На всякий случай: плата за бейдж одноразовая, пользователь оплачивает один раз бейдж и пользуется им сколько угодно. Вдруг кто-то не до конца разобрался.

108👍22🤬8🫡5🍓2🔥2👎1

28 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC≈2,860 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Что скажете про бейджи?

  1. Нравится.11%
  2. Нейтрально отношусь.47%
  3. Не моё.49%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18👀3

28 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC≈2,840 views123 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Там в меню новый пункт появился.

👍6521😐19👎8👀5🤔5

13 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC≈5,940 views151 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Завтра на Фикбуке пройдут технические работы, начнутся где-то в 11:00, ожидаемая продолжительность — три часа.

97👍21😭19👎5👌4🔥3🤝2

3 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC≈4,820 views177 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если вы когда-нибудь хотели внести в ваш никнейм очень мелкое изменение — например, убрать одну букву, исправить досадную опечатку или поменять заглавные буквы на строчные, вы можете написать в службу поддержки, пункт Другие вопросы, и вам помогут.

🥰1322111💋6👍4🍓2🤩1

5 Jun 2026, 15:33 UTC≈6,000 views334 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У меня есть раритетный скриншот, показывающий, как в начале 2020 выглядели шапки с:

😭254🥰31🫡2618❤‍🔥32

4 Jun 2026, 15:16 UTC≈4,830 views193 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ficbook_official

Изменения в дизайне заявок и шапок работ Мы обновили дизайн плашек в шапке работ — и внутри, и снаружи, — чтобы сделать её менее перегруженной визуально. Еще изменения затронули заявки. Вот что изменилось: — Цветовой акцент сейчас сделан прежде всего на направленность работы. Ещё цветом выделена плашка Перевод. — У рейтинга, статуса, оценок, наград теперь нейтральный фон. — У кнопок в заявках — Интересно, Избранн

👎128🤬32😡17👀7🔥4😢41

27 May 2026, 10:11 UTC≈4,940 views173 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На Фикбуке появились упоминания пользователей в комментариях: новость об этом уже есть на сайте. Чтобы тэгнуть пользователя, напишите символ @, начните вводить его никнейм, а после выберите нужного вам пользователя из появившегося выпадающего списка, чтобы упоминание создалось. Если внесенный в ЧС пользователь вас тэгнет, оповещение вам не придёт. Отключить оповещения такого типа можно в настройках профиля.

118👀29❤‍🔥14👎8🔥3👏1

19 May 2026, 11:57 UTC≈4,720 views85 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ficbook_official

Обновления в приложении «Фикбук» для Android и iOS Новая версия приложения для Android и iOS приехала вместе с исправленными багами и новыми функциями для читалки. Вот что изменилось: — В читалке появилось новое меню, спрятанное под кнопкой с тремя точками в правом верхнем углу. Теперь вы можете добавить работу в сборник и отметить её как прочитанную не выходя из читалки. — В этом же меню есть новый пункт: «Читат

57👍13👀6👎5🔥3💯1

13 May 2026, 11:02 UTC≈3,990 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Вам нравились звёздочки в Горячих работах?

  1. Да. Я автор.14%
  2. Да. Я читатель.16%
  3. Нет. Я автор.27%
  4. Нет. Я читатель.18%
  5. Тык, чтобы тыкнуть.45%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ficbook_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTCAnonymous Poll595 voters

Что скажете про бейджи?

  1. Нравится.11%
  2. Нейтрально отношусь.47%
  3. Не моё.49%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 May 2026, 11:02 UTCAnonymous Poll561 voters

Вам нравились звёздочки в Горячих работах?

  1. Да. Я автор.14%
  2. Да. Я читатель.16%
  3. Нет. Я автор.27%
  4. Нет. Я читатель.18%
  5. Тык, чтобы тыкнуть.45%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Apr 2026, 16:31 UTCAnonymous Poll731 voters

Есть ли у вас проблемы со входом в ваш профиль в официальном приложении?

  1. Нет, всё в порядке.37%
  2. Да, у меня есть проблемы со входом в приложении.24%
  3. Не пользуюсь приложением.28%
  4. Делаю вид, что приложения не существует.25%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Фикбук
@ficbook_official · 295,457
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ficbook News” (@ficbook_news), 4,467 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ficbook_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.