Хотите больше углубиться в торговлю через опционы и не только https://t.me/+Iw3IyBtraONjNTEy

Channel
Опционы от Питерского
@fiboforyou
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,980subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002301027111 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fiboforyou |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fiboforyou |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 1,980 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 1,971 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 1,970 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 1,966 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 48s
- Average length
- 2m 48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,126 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 901 | 42.4% | |
| 👍 | 558 | 26.2% | |
| 👏 | 525 | 24.7% | |
| 🎉 | 67 | 3.15% | |
| 🤯 | 48 | 2.26% | |
| ✍ | 16 | 0.753% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 0.282% | |
| 😎 | 5 | 0.235% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 19 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 27
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 12
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
- Most on one post
- 6
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fiboforyou. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 January 2025 to 19 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Мосбиржа пыталась немного слушать опционщиков, но вела себя, как всегда... Хотя уже хорошо, что хотя бы начала слушать. Это только мой взгляд. Посетил опционную конференцию в Москве и заодно посмотрел, как сейчас живут трейдеры в РФ, которые работают на Московской бирже. В России не был 3.5 года, поэтому сравнить мне есть с чем - в том числе с опционными конференциями в Европе, Индии и не только. Накидаю тезисно. С…
🔥64👍16
Но, на мой взгляд, следующий шаг очевиден: нужно гораздо больше показывать реальные преимущества опционов перед линейным рынком. И делать это должны не только представители биржи или брокеров, а реальные трейдеры и фонды, которые действительно работают с опционами и могут показать, как они используют это в торговле на практике. Со своей стороны я даже на первую конференцию привлёк больше 30 участников. И в будущем т…
🔥90👏16
сходите кто может, гарантирую не пожелеете. Илье привет передайте от меня!!!
👍1🤯1
Друзья, у нас шикарная новость! ❗️14 го МАРТА в Москве❗️ состоится грандиозное и знаковое событие для всего нашего опционного рынка: первая ОПЦИОННАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ в РФ после перерыва в 6 (!) лет! И вдвойне приятно, что этот долгожданный перезапуск осуществляет именно компания Dereх (неизменный организатор специализированных опционных конференций с 2005-го года) во главе с легендарной Викторией Дьяковой (по совмес…
👍17🔥10🤯2✍1
Не хватило у биржи за день времени добавить страйки, одно слово 💩
🤯19🎉3
Сейчас другая будет📌 пусть для истории повесит
👍9✍2🤯1
Как были неучами на Мосбирже, так ничего и не меняется за 10 лет только хуже. Про планки в газе в течение только января вообще молчу. Перед тем как торговать опционы, ищите себе препода, который реально будет торговать с вами, а не тупо рассказывать теорию, или вы сольётесь. В России самая худшая биржа в мире. Предлагаю скупить все акции биржи и Коровина Илью поставить туда если конечно потянем его зп))
👍40👏3🤯2✍1🎉1🔥1
Хотите научиться торговли опционами жду вас тут https://t.me/+dLDx59s4k4BmNTI6 там вы сможете проверить все
🔥14
Оппонентам нужно сразу выдавать калькулятор - пусть считают, а не болтают. Стареешь, Илья😉 Быстрее надо выносить этих «умников» — слов у них много, а миллиарда на карманные расходы нет. 📹 Таких видео должно быть больше, чтобы люди не переставали думать. Смотрите и думайте https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ivOzLYGskg
🔥17👍7
У вас есть миллиард? Если нет, то любые знания о циклических процессах теряют смысл в контексте реальной прибыли на рынке. И тогда возникает вопрос: зачем вообще пытаться искать ответы на подобные темы? Если кто-то заявляет, что точно знает, куда пойдут цены на бирже, логично ожидать, что этот человек уже миллиардер. Но если миллиарда у него нет, то вывод напрашивается сам собой: рынок либо не прогнозируется, либо..…
🔥22👍4🤯3🎉2
Опять собрали ленивую позу. Ждем деньги😉
🔥33👍20👏4✍3🎉2🤯1😎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fiboforyou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 441,310 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Опционы от Питерского” (@fiboforyou), 1,980 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fiboforyou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.