Channel
@fiber_pipe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002543782949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fiber_pipe |
| Description | ФАЙБЕР ПАЙП — это программно-аппаратный комплекс для мониторинга смещений опор трубопроводов в Арктике, где добывается 90% газа и 20% нефти России. Проблема смещений вызвана таянием вечной мерзлоты, что ежегодно приводит к большому ущербу. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 8 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fiber_pipe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 49 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 49 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 8 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
29 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 44.8% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 34.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 10.3% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 10.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2025 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We are glad to share this publication by our team and collaborators. See the original post here: https://lnkd.in/dCgXYAjS The paper presents testing of an AWG-based FBG interrogator under space-related environmental factors such as temperature and radiation, and demonstrates the potential of this compact architecture for CubeSat-compatible implementation. Congratulations to all co-authors on this publication. #Photon…
❤4🔥1
🚀 Пять стартапов студентов и выпускников Сколтеха вошли в топ-100 рейтинга стартапов Платформы университетского технологического предпринимательства по результатам 2025 года. Список проектов: «Файбер Пайп» — программно-аппаратный комплекс для мониторинга состояния промысловых трубопроводов в Арктике. «Прокерамика» — аддитивное производство керамических изделий сложной геометрии для биомедицины и машиностроения. «…
❤5👏3
Fiber Pipe на Startech Awards @startechmirinnovaci 🚀 В этом году мы вошли в ТОП-2 студенческих команд. По регламенту призы — только для бакалавриата, а индустриального трека не было, поэтому на сцену не вышли. Для нас - это маркер качества: эксперты поставили нас на вторую строчку по совокупности критериев. В следующем сезоне ждём подходящую категорию и возвращаемся за кубком.
🔥4❤1
Research published in IEEE Sensors Letters The core technology behind our interrogator — an ML-based calibration method for AWG-based FBG demodulation — is now peer-reviewed and officially published in IEEE Sensors Letters! 📄 “Machine Learning-Driven Compensation for Non-Ideal Channels in AWG-Based FBG Interrogator” 🔗 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11072673 📎 arXiv version: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13575 T…
❤1
📄 Published in IEEE Sensors Letters! Our paper “Machine Learning-Driven Compensation for Non-Ideal Channels in AWG-Based FBG Interrogator” is now officially published in early access at IEEE Sensors Letters: 👉 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11072673 This work presents an ML-based calibration pipeline for AWG-based demodulation in FBG interrogators — a core part of my PhD. It shows how machine learning can out…
🔥1
За последние пару месяцев представили наш проект сразу на трех крупных выставках: Фронтиры Прогресса, Startup Village и ЭнергоТехноФест
👍3
⚡️Сколтех на международном фестивале технологического предпринимательства «ЭнергоТехноФест» в Санкт-Петербурге! 🔹Команда студенческого Энергоклуба Сколтеха — президент клуба Татьяна Зайцева и менеджер проектов Эвелина Шиловских — стали активными участниками фестиваля в рамках слёта всех энергоклубов страны Energy BootCamp 2025 и представили результаты своей работы за последние полгода (клуб открыт в декабре 2024). …
❤1
Fiber-Pipe pinned «🚀 Добро пожаловать в официальный Telegram-канал Fiber Pipe! Мы разрабатываем решения для волоконно-оптического мониторинга, а именно интеррогатор для мониторинга трубопроводов и инфраструктуры в реальном времени. Здесь мы будем делиться: 🔹 Новостями проекта…»
🚀 Добро пожаловать в официальный Telegram-канал Fiber Pipe! Мы разрабатываем решения для волоконно-оптического мониторинга, а именно интеррогатор для мониторинга трубопроводов и инфраструктуры в реальном времени. Здесь мы будем делиться: 🔹 Новостями проекта 🔹 Полевыми фото и кейсами 🔹 Научными публикациями 🔹 Подробностями о переходе от лабораторного прототипа к готовой системе 📎 Первый пост на LinkedIn: https://ww…
🔥4❤1
Fiber-Pipe pinned Deleted message
Channel photo updated
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @fiber_pipe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 977,733 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fiber-Pipe” (@fiber_pipe), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fiber_pipe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.