Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ФГДМ Х PHOENIX RACING

@fgdrmsk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,461subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002054400094
TypeChannel
Username@fgdrmsk
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fgdrmsk

Growth

2,4612,4882,474.57 August 2026 — 2,488 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,481 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,461 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,457–2,492 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:422,461-20
7 Aug 2026, 21:112,481-7
7 Aug 2026, 02:012,488first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 2,461 subscribers
Avg views / post
713
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total12,834
Reactions total560
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

560 reactions across 18 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁6511.6%
6211.1%
🔥519.11%
🤡478.39%
🐳447.86%
417.32%
❤‍🔥407.14%
custom 5253490055279845590346.07%
👍244.29%
🏆213.75%
💯213.75%
💋193.39%
🎉152.68%
🍌111.96%
custom 547231841137775056991.61%
🤬71.25%
💩61.07%
🥰61.07%
custom 547203067863368459250.893%
🤯40.714%
17 further kinds285.00%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 560reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC257 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С сегодняшнего дня этот молодой человек зачислен на бюджет Южно-Уральского государственного университета по специальности «Информационная безопасность»! Артём Манапов стал первым российским пилотом в составе Phoenix Racing и в прошлом году красиво выступал на виртуальных соревнованиях Drone Champions League 📹 Также Артём первым из фениксов пересел на Porsche — ПРУФЫ ТУТ 👆 А потом сразу на отечественную тачку 👆 пот

🎉134🔥3❤‍🔥1😁1custom 52534900552798455901

7 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC349 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Москвичи, кто прямо сейчас? 🔥 — 34 градуса по Цельсию

🔥10😁41❤‍🔥1🐳1

5 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC580 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❤️ САМЫЙ ТРУДНЫЙ КОНКУРС ➡️ набор для вупчика отправляем краснодарской банде котов Маргариты Николенко; ➡️ им на пятки наступала челябинская группировка Алексея Волкова, за это высылаем Алексею 5 пачек модных пропеллеров на семёрки; ➡️ Стефану Афанасьеву и его татарской вислоухой семье тоже зашлём пропеллеров, большие — для мамы-кошки, маленькие — котятам; ➡️ голому уральскому коту Савелия Засорина дарим пачку в

❤‍🔥64🔥3🍾2👍21👏1🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC638 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, в канал налили ботов. Причина, вероятнее всего, — текущий розыгрыш, поэтому мы вынуждены его отменить. Набор определённой цифры подписчиков никогда не был нашей целью. Оставайтесь с нами, если вам нравится то, что мы делаем. А комплект для сборки вупа, мы, скорее всего, подарим котикам, как и обещали, лайки уже посчитали 🔪

🤡32🤬7💩6custom 52534900552798455904🤮32😭2

4 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC667 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🥹🥹🥹О ЧЁМ МОЛЧАТ В ГОНКАХ ДРОНОВ 🥹Дрон-рейсинг бьёт по карману Старт — от 50 000 рублей (FPV-очки, аппаратура, аналоговый вуп). Если затянет, дальше — только дороже: дронов нужно больше, для гонок удобнее летать на HDZero, оборудование требует ремонта или замены, а поездки на соревнования влетают в копеечку. 🥹Доступной информации — кот наплакал Знания разбросаны по всему частично заблокированному интернету. Плюс э

💯156😁4🔥21❤‍🔥1🐳1👍1

3 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC755 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

САМАЯ МИЛАЯ КОЛЛАБА СНГ-FPV-КОММЬЮНИТИ 💓 Кидайте фотки своих котов и собак в комментарии, самому залайканному что-нибудь подарим 🙂

❤‍🔥85🥰3🏆1💋1💘1😁1😍1

3 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC548 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fpvgayPhoto

Сходка фпв котят❤️‍🔥

😁13❤‍🔥75🤩2🥰2

2 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC740 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

PLAN T — СЕРИЯ 3 Финальный выпуск получился очень про ценности и цену. Из влога вы узнаете: 👉 во сколько обойдётся завтрак в Стамбуле; 👉 чем приходится платить за неудачный краш на гонке; 👉 почему иногда победа стоит намного дороже, чем золотые кубки и призовые. [ В ЧЁМ СИЛА? на Youtube ] [ В ЧЁМ СИЛА? во Вконтакте ] Для тех, кто любит долгие просмотры: [ Плейлист PLAN T — Turkey на Youtube ] [ Плейлист PLAN

🔥6custom 525349005527984559052❤‍🔥2🤡21🏆1👍1

1 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC728 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Иногда проявка плёнки занимает приблизительно сто лет 📸 Нащёлкали каких-то гоночных селеб на российскую Тасму (made in Kazan) в Нинбо: [ смотреть кадры ] А если вдруг ещё не видели наш влог про поездку: 📹 что скрывается за мечтой попасть на международные соревнования? 📹 почему китайское путешествие началось с полного хаоса? 📹 как вторая ночь в Китае превратилась в настоящий кошмар? 📹 когда турнир был проигран

custom 52534900552798455904❤‍🔥2🔥2🤡2😁1

31 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC883 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🎨 А расскажите, за что именно вы любите командные гонки и своего сокомандника?

😁29❤‍🔥9custom 52534900552798455906🤡31🔥1😍1😎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fgdrmsk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTCAnonymous Poll177 voters

За кого болеете? 🐯

  1. Александр Холкин18%
  2. Данил Грязнов11%
  3. Платон Черемных22%
  4. Кирилл Лобань49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 98,230 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФГДМ Х PHOENIX RACING” (@fgdrmsk), 2,461 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fgdrmsk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.