Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for (ИЩУ ВЛ) ☾Silver𓂀

Channel

(ИЩУ ВЛ) ☾Silver𓂀

@fg562i

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

274subscribers

+130 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003807841894
TypeChannel
Username@fg562i
Description‼️ОТПИСКА=БАН‼️ Тт: tiktok.com/@03_78hj •–—–——• Лс влд: @Horr_119 •Фан.Тег: #Сильве, #Sil, #Сильвер, #омежка #Силомежка Цель:290
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held4
On Telegramt.me/fg562i

Previous handles

@fg562i was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@FSilair_98
held 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026

Growth

1442742099 August 2026 — 144 subscribers10 August 2026 — 144 subscribers9 November 2026 — 274 subscribers9 November 2026 — 274 subscribers9 August 20269 November 2026
4 measurements spanning 92 days, net +130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 125–294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 13:22274no change
9 Nov 2026, 12:47274+130
10 Aug 2026, 12:52144no change
9 Aug 2026, 21:47144first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.78%
avg views ÷ 274 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.6
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held31 (9 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total223
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,150
Videos
≈34
Links
≈255

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1927.1%
custom 52355760387459894831622.9%
custom 52040571807261203651521.4%
custom 542285684644252912468.57%
🍓45.71%
🎃45.71%
custom 542040270642456404234.29%
👀22.86%
👻11.43%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 06:47 UTC14 views7 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 𓂀- Ещё один спойлер к видео тяф:3 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Реакции мои котики а то актива ноль

👀2custom 54204027064245640422custom 54228568464425291242👻1

9 Nov 2026, 02:04 UTC10 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @pokimonchik_666Photo

Репост/проверка актива #репост

8 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC10 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @Kami_LegenDdPhoto

—🤩будет мало репостов. #репосты #Ками

8 Nov 2026, 13:14 UTC19 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @PodvaltytytyPhoto

Будешь дружить с нами? 🫣

8 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC26 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Ками с др ••Поздравляю белую Кончу с др, хуй знает сколько тебе но поздравляю. •2 я ещё давненько сделал но итог чистый ему не показывал☺️ #Дьявол

🎃4

8 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

.𖥔 ݁˖ .°. •๑. ☆ •๑.°𖥔 ݁˖ ⋆ . ˖ ݁𖥔 Э𑀝ТАФЕТА!! 𖥔 ݁˖ ꒰ 𐌿ᥱρᥱдᥲ᧘ Дьявол ꒱ ☆° .•⋆𑀝уᴛь ϶ᥴᴛᥲɸᥱᴛы: Папищеки в каминтарии под этим постом скидывют любую понравившуюся им работу автора⋆ . ⋆ Передаю: ¤.☆Бантик ¤.☆Широ ¤.☆Крисс ⋆ .•☆ .°. •๑. ☆ ˖๑.°𖥔 ݁˖. ݁

custom 54228568464425291242custom 54204027064245640421

7 Nov 2026, 18:35 UTC19 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

• репостов наверна не будет 🥹💔 #Астма

7 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

_ .︶꒷꒥꒷‧₊˚꒷︶꒷꒥꒷‧₊_🗞 𝒩εw 𝓅οsτ #Риц ⸝⸝ ֪ ⁝⁝ ͡︵ֺ ▶︎ •၊၊၊|။||။‌‌၊| 2:32 “᭡ ⊹— вот вам арт, рисовал для заказчика 🎉 ─────── ·✉· ─────── · 𔓕‌ ִ ۫ 𝆺𝅥 𝆭 ۫▪️ 𝆹𝅥 𝅥 ׄ. ֺּׄ۫ 𝓇𝒾𝓉𝓈 _ ݁ ። ֺ ︶ 𝅄 ▬ࣳ▭‌ #админРиц #новыйпост #арт ﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌ Мοй τгκ: https://t.me/Rits_vi Мοй λς: @Riicvi

custom 54228568464425291242

7 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC15 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @Miyaaa_official31Photo

Давненько чота репостов не было #Мия #Репосты

7 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC20 viewsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @bow_authorPhoto

-ну я кажется не милая🥺

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @fg562i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

𓂀- во что играем?

  1. Шип со мной40%
  2. Вышибалы10%
  3. Ассоциация10%
  4. Угадай гачера20%
  5. Наши дети20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“(ИЩУ ВЛ) ☾Silver𓂀” (@fg562i), 274 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fg562i.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.