Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

小卢的秘密花园💓

@ffj678

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,045subscribers

+328 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003772801673
TypeChannel
Username@ffj678
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ffj678

Growth

7171,0458817 August 2026 — 717 subscribers7 August 2026 — 754 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,045 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +328. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 668–1,094 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:251,045+291
7 Aug 2026, 11:23754+37
7 Aug 2026, 06:16717first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
102.6%
avg views ÷ 1,045 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.142%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total21,451
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC116 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

💕小卢老师的性爱小课堂已经开课啦 🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻 🍑认准唯一🈷️课号: @xxl8989 💓长腿御姐 敏感体质 情绪感拉🈵 🍧不冷场 不崔钟 🉑🐍 🉑69 深喉 🍏🉑拍不露脸视小频

6 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC414 viewsread 7 August 2026

老师:小卢 满意度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 整体体验非常满意,老师身材条件很好,气质在线,颜值和身材都属于比较出众的类型。实际状态和介绍基本一致,整体形象管理得不错。 服务过程中沟通顺畅,配合度高,态度也比较自然,不会让人觉得尴尬。过程中体验感很好,节奏把控比较舒服,互动感强。 老师整体优势比较明显,身材比例很好,属于比较有特色的类型。如果皮肤状态再提升一些,整体完成度会更高。 综合来看,这次体验超过预期,性价比较高,服务认真,推荐指数★★★★★。

6 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC463 viewsread 7 August 2026

成都嫩妹御姐高校车评 基本信息: 【时间】:2026-07-27 【老师】:小卢 【留名】:黎 问寒 【老师年龄】:19 【是否代聊】:代聊 【修车水费】:800p 【所在位置】:高升桥 【服务内容】:陪浴 蛇 69 评价得分: 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:8.5 【颜值】:8.4 【身材】:9.9 【服务】:9.0 【态度】:10.0 【环境】:9.0 【综合】:9.13 【过程】:小卢 19 172/94,人照8.5分吧,颜值8.4,漂亮的,脸配上妆看起来棱角分明,真人看着有点别人开了美颜的样子,却没照片那么圆润,瘦高的身材,大长腿,胸B+,态度好,配合度高,乳头一般,褐色,下面粉粉的,好嫩啊,刚刚发育的小蝴蝶,毛量很少,可🐍可略,小蛇,粉粉的下面深深吸引,好吃的先吃半个小时,水一点点,小卢说高潮了两次,反馈很小很难察觉,应该是真的,60分钟的课程,也没催我,紧度适中,有明显叫呻吟中,体验不错

5 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC756 viewsread 7 August 2026

🌻现在🈳🈳🈳🈳 🌻不用等 🌻🈷️🈷️🈷️🈷️🈷️🈷️🈷️🈷️

5 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC778 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

休息回来啦 今天可以🈷️课哦 休息回来啦 今天可以🈷️课哦

2

28 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC≈1,490 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌸【成都海花集修车群】🌸 专用报告 🌸基础信息🌸 【妹子花名】:小卢小卢 【妹子车牌】:@xxl8989 【验证留名】:Nikovvei 【验证时间】:16:00 【所在位置】:高升桥 【修车水费】:800P 【是否代聊】:代聊 🌸硬件评价🌸 【身高体重】:170,90斤左右,无纹身 【妹子年龄】:19 【湿度紧度昆感】:湿度中规中矩,小骨架女生,皮肤紧致,有点子紧的,昆感不错。 【颜值相似】:颜照相似给8分。 【凶器罩杯】:B+,妹妹很瘦,显得很大)乳头颜色正常,腺体胸 胸型好看 🌸软件评价🌸 【环境卫生】:周围藏民较多,相对安全 【服务内容】:嫩妹三件套,口的时间比较久。 【机车行为】:无 🌸综合评价🌸 【优点缺点】:为身材买单,高高瘦瘦不竹竿。可能洗澡比较多,皮肤稍稍干燥。 【性 价 比】: 8分/满分10.0分 【推荐程度】:8分/满分10.0分 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价

2

28 Jul 2026, 02:22 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

💕小卢老师的性爱小课堂已经开课啦 🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻 🍑认准唯一🈷️课号: @xxl8989 💓长腿御姐 敏感体质 情绪感拉🈵 🍧不冷场 不崔钟 🉑🐍 🉑69 深喉 🍏🉑拍不露脸视小频

26 Jul 2026, 02:58 UTC≈1,320 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💕小卢老师的性爱小课堂已经开课啦 🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻 🍑认准唯一🈷️课号: @xxl8989 💓长腿御姐 敏感体质 情绪感拉🈵 🍧不冷场 不崔钟 🉑🐍 🉑69 深喉 🍏🉑拍不露脸视小频

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ffj678. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 942,210 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小卢的秘密花园💓” (@ffj678), 1,045 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ffj678.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.