Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بوی باران

Channel

بوی باران

@fereshteh_rezayi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,131subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001082558652
TypeChannel
Username@fereshteh_rezayi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fereshteh_rezayi

Growth

6,1316,1666,148.56 August 2026 — 6,166 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,166 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,146 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,140 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,131 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,126–6,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:546,131-9
12 Aug 2026, 01:316,140-6
8 Aug 2026, 20:266,146-20
6 Aug 2026, 03:216,166no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:216,166first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 6,131 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held29 (23 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total29,381
Reactions total561
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

506 reactions across 26 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44487.7%
👏356.92%
🕊275.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 561reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC313 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آدمِ امن میتونه تمام ماجرا باشه... @fereshteh_rezayi

15

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

10 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC379 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

در یوگا حرکتی هست به نام "آغوش" قانونش اینطور است که باید برای چند دقیقه خودت را سفت و محکم در آغوش بگیری، فکرت را از همه چیز خالی کنی و فقط روی خودت تمرکز داشته باشی! راستش خیلی وقت‌ها فکر میکنم اگر این حرکت هم مثل خیلی از کارها که انجامش عادی شده یا ضرورت است به زندگی‌مان اضافه میشد چه خوب بود... مثل غذا خوردن، مثل خوابیدن روزی یکدفعه هم خودت را سفت و محکم بغل میکردی و تمام حواست را برای کسی میگذاشتی که در آغوشت بو

16👏5

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

10 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC379 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«چیزی را برای بعد نگذارید، بعد‌ها زندگی می‌گذرد...» @fereshteh_rezayi

11👏1

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

8 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC512 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

یه جمله که زندگیتون رو عوض میکنه: کمال طلبی ناسالم رو کنار بذارین و خود ناقصتون رو در آغوش بگیرید. @fereshteh_rezayi

18👏2

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

8 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC546 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

قرار نیست کسی نجاتم دهد، خودم باید خودم را نجات دهم. حتی باید خودم را از دستِ خودم نجات بدهم و خودم را وادارم که گام‌های کوچکی به جلو بردارم. همه‌ی روز هر روز و حتی وقتی حس و حالش را ندارم . #مل_رابینز @fereshteh_rezayi

18🕊2

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

7 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC644 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اگر از من بپرسید به چه کسی نباید اعتماد کرد؟ می‌گویم: آدمی که با همه دوست است. دوست بودن با همه نیازمند هزاران نقاب، هزاران دروغ و هزاران تزویر است. @fereshteh_rezayi

21👏1

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

6 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC757 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

خاطره‌هایت مصمم‌تر، از قول‌هایت بودند برای ماندن کنارِ من… قول‌هایت خیلی زود خسته شدند و چمدان‌شان را بستند اما خاطره‌هایت مدت‌هاست روزها و شب‌ها همدم تنهایی‌ام شدند قول‌ها بی‌وفا بودند اما خاطره‌ها وفادار وفادار وفادار #فرشته_رضایی @fereshteh_rezayi

20🕊5

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

6 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC754 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بدترین خستگی مالِ جسم نیست مال وقتیه که هیچی نگفتی همه چی رو تو دلت نگه داشتی و وانمود کردی حالت خوبه. @fereshteh_rezayi

18👏2🕊1

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

6 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC781 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

از کسی که تو سختی ریشه‌هاتو به امید گره میزنه مواظبت کن... @fereshteh_rezayi

19

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

5 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC864 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

جهت دلبری تمدید و یادآوریِ دوستی. 🎧 @fereshteh_rezayi 🎶

10

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

5 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC829 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

غرور هم دارد! فکر کن… در دنیایی که هر روز میلیون‌ها نفر از تنهایی حرف می‌زنند در دنیایی که از شعرِ شاعرهایش گرفته تا رمان‌ها و فیلم‌ها پر از حسرت است، پر از تلخیِ نرسیدن یک نفر بیاید، از نسل ماندن آرامِ جان… که بلد باشد دلتنگی‌هایت را در آغوش بگیرد و دردهایت را تسکین دهد که بلد باشد قرارِ دلِ بی‌قرارت شود کم نیست! باور کن تو هم اگر یک نفر مثل خودت داشتی سرت را بالا می‌گرفتی و روی ابرها راه می‌رفتی... #فرشته_رضایی @f

18👏3

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

5 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC714 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

فاصله کارِ تن است، دل جدا نمی‌شود. @fereshteh_rezayi

17🕊2

Signed Fereshteh Rezayi

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @fereshteh_rezayi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,037,612 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بوی باران” (@fereshteh_rezayi), 6,131 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fereshteh_rezayi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.