Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 59 days, net -481. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,848–35,844 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 16:21
35,248
+167
26 Sept 2026, 14:41
35,081
-73
17 Sept 2026, 08:59
35,154
-38
15 Sept 2026, 06:16
35,192
+229
13 Sept 2026, 12:58
34,963
-37
11 Sept 2026, 19:41
35,000
-63
9 Sept 2026, 07:15
35,063
-75
6 Sept 2026, 00:17
35,138
-22
3 Sept 2026, 20:42
35,160
-28
2 Sept 2026, 12:04
35,188
-14
1 Sept 2026, 09:54
35,202
-29
31 Aug 2026, 10:26
35,231
-18
30 Aug 2026, 13:37
35,249
-17
29 Aug 2026, 14:33
35,266
-13
28 Aug 2026, 17:05
35,279
-24
27 Aug 2026, 15:43
35,303
-15
26 Aug 2026, 18:48
35,318
-25
25 Aug 2026, 16:34
35,343
-34
24 Aug 2026, 15:12
35,377
-47
22 Aug 2026, 21:04
35,424
first reading
Engagement
308 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.10%
avg views ÷ 35,248 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,210
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
122
of 308 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 121 of 122 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
308 (28 July 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
391,450
Reactions total
13,313
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Oct 2026, 07:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
804
Videos
272
Links
557
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
14m 00s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,985 reactions across 294 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
20,272
75.1%
👍
3,144
11.7%
🙏
1,679
6.22%
👏
550
2.04%
😍
199
0.737%
🤔
186
0.689%
👌
174
0.645%
🤩
117
0.434%
🤯
104
0.385%
💯
91
0.337%
🍓
62
0.23%
😁
54
0.2%
😱
52
0.193%
❤🔥
34
0.126%
🕊
30
0.111%
🤷♀
30
0.111%
🔥
29
0.107%
😢
29
0.107%
🥴
27
0.1%
🥰
24
0.089%
17 further kinds
98
0.363%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 302 of the 308 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 308 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌿 یه نکته مهم دیگه هم اینه که روزی ۱ تا ۲ قاشق روغن سالم، مثل روغن زیتون یا کنجد، توی رژیمتون داشته باشید 🫒✨
💧 از نوشیدن آب کافی در طول روز هم غافل نشید.
🍂 پاییز یعنی مراقبت، گرما و تعادل 🌰🍵
📌 این عکس رو هم ذخیره کنید تا غذاهای پاییزی یادتون نره! ❤️
🍂 توی این فصل، میوههای پاییزی 🍎🍇، چربیهای مفید مثل روغن زیتون 🫒 و خورشهای گرم و تر 🥣 رو بیشتر مصرف کنید.
👀 توی پست بعدی نوشتم دقیقاً چه چیزایی برای سلامتی بدنتون توی پاییز بهتره بخورید.
❤️ قبلش منتظر ریاکشنهاتونم! 👇🏻✨
🍂 پاییز فصل سرد و خشکیه، برای همین توی این فصل بهتره پنیر، ماست، دوغ و خوراکیهای سرد رو کمتر مصرف کنیم. 🧀🥛
شاید بگین: «خب دوغ که خوبه! پنیر هم کلسیم داره و برای بدن لازمه!» 🤔
اما مصرف این خوراکیها میتونه متابولیسم بدن رو پایین بیاره و جریان خون مویرگی رو کندتر و چسبندهتر کنه؛ در نتیجه احتمال لخته شدن خون بیشتر میشه. 🩸⚠️
🍂✨ ایرانیهای قدیم با تغییر هر فصل، سبک تغذیهشون رو هم تغییر میدادن.
اما امروز خیلی وقتها بدون توجه به فصل، همون غذاهایی رو میخوریم که دلمون میخواد. 😋
🍁 همونطور که طبیعت تغییر میکنه، ما هم که عضوی از طبیعتیم، باید متناسب با فصل مراقب تغذیهمون باشیم.
🥣 پس غذای پاییزمون نباید دقیقاً مثل غذای تابستون باشه! 🍂✨
🍂❤️ دلیلش فقط تغذیهی اشتباهه!
هر فصلی غذاها و میوههای مخصوص خودش رو داره 🍎🥦
ولی ما معمولاً به این موضوع توجه نمیکنیم و هر چیزی که دلمون بخواد میخوریم 😋
⚠️ و همین تغذیهی نامناسب میتونه روی سلامت بدن و قلب و عروق تأثیر بذاره. 🫀✨
🥛🌱 حالا یه مایه ماست گیاهی داری که هم میتونی خودش رو بهعنوان ماست استفاده کنی و خیلی هم خوشطعمه 😍✨
هم با همین مایه میتونی دوباره ماست جدید مایه بزنی و یه ماست کاملاً جیگری و سفت داشته باشی! 🤩💚
✨🥛 اینجا یه تفاوت مهم داریم! 👀
برای ماست معمولی، شیر باید کاملاً ولرم باشه؛ اما برای این ماست گیاهی، شیر باید یهکم داغتر باشه، طوری که انگشتت رو کمی بسوزونه 🔥☝🏻
🌱 بادومهای میکسشده رو میریزیم داخل شیر، خوب هم میزنیم و حسابی دورش رو میپوشونیم تا گرم بمونه. 🥛🧣
⏰ حدود ۱۰ تا ۱۲ ساعت به همین حالت میذاریم بمونه، بعد میبریمش ۳ تا ۴ ساعت داخل یخچال. ❄️😍
⚠️🥛 عزیزان توجه کنید!
🌰 یا بادام استفاده کنید یا کنجد.
البته میتونید از مغزهای دیگه مثل فندق و گردو هم استفاده کنید 😍🌱
💪🏻 برای پروتئین بیشتر، حتی میتونید ترکیب چندتا از این مغزها رو با هم استفاده کنید.
فقط حتماً پوست قهوه ای رو بگیرید و مغزها رو خوب و کامل آسیاب کنید. ✨👌🏻
🥛🌱 حالا اگه دستور این ماست خفن با استارتر طبیعی رو میخواین،
این پایین یه ❤️ برام بذارین تا بریم آموزش درست کردنش رو بهتون بدم! 😍👇🏻
❤540🤩14
Showing the 12 most recent of 308 posts we hold for @fereshte_esfidani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fereshte_esfidani edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 25 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دوست دارید آموزش درست کردن کرم جوانه گندم و براتون بذارم؟
آره حتماً! اصلاً منتظر همین بودم 😍55%
بذار، ولی جایگزین روغن جوانه گندم هم بگو (ندارمش!) 🌾31%
اگه واقعاً پوست رو صاف و شفاف میکنه، آره ✌️36%
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🍂 یه سوال :
برای شما هم با شروع فصل پاییز، کدوم یکی از این اتفاقها میافته؟ 👀🍁
💧 خشکی پوست38%
😣 احساس کشیدگی6%
🌫️ کدر شدن پوست8%
🍂 پوستهپوسته شدن7%
✨ یا تمام موارد؟42%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 308 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دکتر جاوید @doctor_javid · 20,002 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دکتر فرشته” (@fereshte_esfidani), 35,248 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fereshte_esfidani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.