🚀 Free trades and daily forex analysis
💰 87% winning trades last week, 3-7 signals daily
🥇 8+ years in trading
👇 VIP room access below – don't miss out!
@felixfx_official
We are ONLY sharing our own ideas and our ideas are NOT any FINANCIAL ADVICE
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 84 days, net +1,445. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,725–36,059 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Oct 2026, 02:38
34,555
-11
29 Oct 2026, 23:08
34,566
-18
29 Oct 2026, 02:10
34,584
+12
28 Oct 2026, 00:29
34,572
+2
27 Oct 2026, 00:06
34,570
+4
26 Oct 2026, 00:00
34,566
+13
25 Oct 2026, 02:55
34,553
-27
24 Oct 2026, 04:20
34,580
-41
23 Oct 2026, 00:51
34,621
-38
21 Oct 2026, 20:41
34,659
-35
20 Oct 2026, 17:05
34,694
-43
19 Oct 2026, 13:34
34,737
-15
18 Oct 2026, 16:36
34,752
-8
17 Oct 2026, 17:06
34,760
-8
16 Oct 2026, 20:18
34,768
-23
15 Oct 2026, 22:55
34,791
-32
15 Oct 2026, 00:00
34,823
-21
13 Oct 2026, 17:20
34,844
-123
10 Oct 2026, 00:20
34,967
-164
5 Oct 2026, 19:55
35,131
first reading
Engagement
1,383 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 153 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.72%
avg views ÷ 34,555 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
577 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.819%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
584
of 1,383 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 523 of 577 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held
1,383 (7 August 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total
940,659
Reactions total
7,128
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
31 Oct 2026, 05:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,580
Videos
≈661
Links
≈3,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
31m 36s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,463 reactions across 915 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,340
36.9%
👍
4,897
33.9%
🔥
2,976
20.6%
🥰
734
5.08%
👏
396
2.74%
⚡
61
0.422%
😱
23
0.159%
🏆
8
0.055%
🤗
7
0.048%
🎉
4
0.028%
👀
4
0.028%
😍
4
0.028%
❤🔥
2
0.014%
🍾
2
0.014%
💯
2
0.014%
🆒
1
0.007%
🙈
1
0.007%
🤪
1
0.007%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 915 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,463 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 986 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @felixfx_trading. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 30 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚀 Look at all these wins from last Week!
You’ve already seen a few results — but that’s definitely not all ‼️
Here’s another sneakpeak straight from the VIP profits 🥇
The VIP is growing fast and spots are limited every day...
💹 Join now for lifetime access to signals, education, and support from a serious trading community.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ | 4.9/5 on Trustpilot
📥 JOIN FREE HERE 👈
👉 More Results:
@felixfx_reviews
ALL TRADES OUT AND WHAT A DAY ❤️🔥
VIP banked. You watched💰
That stings? Good. Remember this feeling. Next week it doesn't have to be like this 😏
👇 JOIN VIP NOW
@felixfx_official
💸 Gold was flying down - the system caught the move and took the maximum
A strong trading day: gold made a sharp move down, opening opportunities both for selling at high levels and for buying at key supports.
Signal statistics from the VIP room are below 👇🏻
🥇 How to trade without emotions: myth or skill?
One of the most frequent requests from newbies:
“I want to turn off emotions in trading”
But let's be honest:
It's impossible to completely remove emotions.
You are not a robot. But you can learn not to act under their influence.
Emotions are natural
Reacting is a choice
👉 How to pump this skill?
1) Trade according to a clear system
When there is structure - less r…
💬 I prepare another useful and informative post for you
This time I decided to touch upon a topic that absolutely everyone faces - from newbies who have just entered the market to experienced participants who have already had years of trading and investing under their belt.
We have launched a unique promotion together with PuPrime!
100% BONUS on your first deposit — and you can use these funds directly in trading.
How it works in practice:
Deposit 350$ → 700$ in trading
Deposit 800$ → 1 600$ in trading
Deposit 1 000$ → 2 000$ in trading
How to get a 100% bonus on your first deposit?
It's simple: send me the code word “BOOST” and I'll tell you all the details.
👉 @felixfx_official
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣ - HOW TO BECOME REALLY PROFITABLE (read)
I will send you a free invite link to my private community & all you have to do to get one…
Just message me “READY” right now & I’ll send an invite to the next 25 people
💬 @felixfx_official
I will delete this message when the spots are filled
🇬🇷 Story of a VIP member from Greece: how trading pulled him out of his routine and led to a stable 700€ - 1 100€ per month!
Sometimes change begins with one simple moment - life seems to become too monotonous, and a person finally realizes that they don't want to live like this anymore and finally takes control of their life.
He joined our VIP program without any particular expectations, he just wanted to learn so…
📈 In trading, many things become clear over time
The story below is an example of how consistency and the right approach eventually lead to solid results 👇
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,383 posts we hold for @felixfx_trading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
After seeing this week’s results, what’s your next step?
I want to join VIP39%
I’m already in VIP and plan to scale up my balance31%
I’m already in VIP, happy with my balance18%
Just watching for now14%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 30 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Felix | Fx trading” (@felixfx_trading), 34,555 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/felixfx_trading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.