Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нити случая| τα θέματα της υπόθεσης

Channel

Нити случая| τα θέματα της υπόθεσης

@felitie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003701043283
TypeChannel
Username@felitie
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 20 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/felitie

Growth

8587867 August 2026 — 87 subscribers9 August 2026 — 87 subscribers14 August 2026 — 85 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:4785-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:0187no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:3887first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.4%
avg views ÷ 85 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 May 20262 August 2026)
Views total67
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘4322.6%
3920.5%
❤‍🔥3820.0%
💋3719.5%
🙏84.21%
🔥73.68%
42.11%
🥰42.11%
💔31.58%
🍓21.05%
🐳21.05%
👀10.526%
💯10.526%
🙉10.526%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC27 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vne_dogm_MPhoto

🧡🧡🧡 🧡🪘🧡 Доброго времени 🧡🧡🧡 суток, я 😀. Обычный практик, который не вписывается в одну религию и не пытается это делать. Собираю свою систему через личный опыт, взаимодействие и наблюдение. ⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️🌒⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️ : МОИ ПОКРОВИТЕЛИ : 🐈‍⬛Кеметизм: Сет • Тот • Анубис 🌹Северная тр: Локи 🤎Эллинизм: Геката ❤️Гоэтия: Асмодей : МОЯ ПРАКТИКА : таро • алтари • символы • сны

1💋1

31 Jul 2026, 00:02 UTC40 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Есть ли у меня тут любители почитать? Буду очень благодарна, если напишете о своих любимых книгах или посоветуете что-нибудь к прочтению, на абсолютно любые темы в том числе и историю или античную литературу

💘5💋41

6 Jul 2026, 22:05 UTC118 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Возможно это ОЧЕНЬ странный вопрос.... Однако есть люди которые работают через ислам? Недавно об этом задумалась, ведь через христианство как я знаю и помню работают, а через ислам? Спасибо за вопрос 💭 Если коротко: да, через ислам работают, и это огромный, пласт восточной магии. Но здесь есть важный нюанс. Точно так же, как и «христианская магия», так называемая «исламская магия» — это древние, дорелигиозные языческ

💋3💘3❤‍🔥1💔1

6 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC81 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Было бы здорово, если бы вы написали, что именно хотели бы узнать о богах, демонах, может разных силах. Пишите о тех темах, которые вам сейчас интересны: анон

💋52🐳1💘1🔥1🙉1

6 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC81 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

То чувство когда изначально посвещала этот тгк элленизму но не туда свернула, хаха💭☄️

💋2🥰21❤‍🔥1💔1🙏1

6 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC80 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Здесь понаписала различные истории о встречах людей с джиннами. Каждая из них по своему жуткая на самом деле :_> Желаю вам приятного чтения!💭

2❤‍🔥2💘2💋1💯1

6 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC63 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Писала немного о демонах, хотела бы теперь подробно также затронуть тему богов и мироздания, интересно?

  1. Не очень0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💔1💘1🥰1

6 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC66 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Как то я обещала написать про привороты, всё же эта тема актуальна всегда

2❤‍🔥1💋1💘1

6 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC76 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Решила немного продолжить тему о восточной магии, уж очень они мне понравились. Как вам?

2💋2💘2🔥2🙏2❤‍🔥1

6 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC82 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Здесь я написала — природа джиннов и их происхождение — классификация каст — магрибское и вавилонское колдовство — сглаз, подселение и энергетические удары — любовные связи с духами — бытовые правила защиты

5🙏3❤‍🔥2💋21💘1🔥1

6 Jul 2026, 03:42 UTC59 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я подготовила для вас материал, в котором собрана информация о различных видах негативного воздействия, их возможных проявлениях и взглядах традиций на эту тему💫

❤‍🔥4💋3💘3🙏2👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @felitie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

Писала немного о демонах, хотела бы теперь подробно также затронуть тему богов и мироздания, интересно?

  1. Не очень0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нити случая| τα θέματα της υπόθεσης” (@felitie), 85 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/felitie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.