Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53075533641401079208custom 52493903157222615012custom 52111587459413013371

Channel
@feks_CC
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001701584196 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @feks_CC |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/feks_CC |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 01:56 | 31 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 27 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 20 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
103 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5307553364140107920 | 33 | 32.0% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 22.3% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5249390315722261501 | 10 | 9.71% | |
| custom 5452132498878250859 | 10 | 9.71% | |
| custom 5211158745941301337 | 7 | 6.80% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 6.80% | |
| custom 5210955890340945568 | 2 | 1.94% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2024 to 28 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53075533641401079208custom 52493903157222615012custom 52111587459413013371
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52111587459413013376custom 53075533641401079204custom 52109558903409455682
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54521324988782508595custom 53075533641401079204custom 52493903157222615011
Концепт трёх
custom 53075533641401079205custom 52493903157222615013custom 54521324988782508593
Автопортрет
custom 53075533641401079206custom 52493903157222615012custom 54521324988782508591
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53075533641401079206custom 52493903157222615012custom 54521324988782508591
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥6
Злобни Фекс
❤5
Сейф, Джек и генерал Молотов в сопровождении Тени Венеции
🔥2❤1
Channel photo updated
Сын Суприматический
👏6🔥2
Пара черновиков для будущих артов
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @feks_CC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бесы Фекса” (@feks_CC), 31 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feks_CC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.