Channel
@feijibk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,945subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002608143943 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @feijibk |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/feijibk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 2,945 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 2,948 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 26 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
25 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ 紧急提醒：请立刻停止使用比特派钱包！ ⚠️ 比特派是唯一有司法协助入口的钱包！ 最近链上安全问题频发，很多使用“比特派”钱包用户资产莫名被转走，等发现的时候，钱包已经被清空。为了避免不必要的风险，请大家尽量更换为更稳定、更常用的钱包，并妥善保管自己的助记词和私钥。 同时如果客户的地址出现问题，比特派愿意配合与执法部门合作，并提供技术支持把客户的IP提交给执法部门！ 我们要坚决抵制比特派“黑社会行为” 我推荐以下钱包登入苹果国外ID搜索下载 “Tokenpocket” “TronLink” “imtoken” 安卓建议在谷歌商店下载！
现在是10月29号，今天依旧0收入，依旧没人带我赚大钞。外面下雨了很冷，我很饿，身上的钱只够吃一碗猪脚饭了，吃了这顿饭以后该怎么办？我很迷茫。以前打工一个月3000非常的满足。每月还可以下2.3次馆子，除去花销，有时候还能结余二三百，自从做了网络，就开始怀疑人生了，你们一谈就是天天赚几千几万，看到你们晒的图，经常晚上睡不着。有时候甚至怀疑世界都是假的。 家人们你们怎么都不说话了 说话啊！你们又在赚什么钱？你们说话啊 我好害怕 好怕你们又挣到钱了看你们挣到钱比我亏钱还他妈难受！不要挣那么多钱了好吗 够自己花就行。
这是谁的部将？ 又是谁的父母 这些骗招的你是全家暴毙了？ 77岁大爷你们都不放过？简直是泯灭人性。 出国工作请大家擦亮眼睛，切勿轻信！！！
❤1
近期在各大公开群看到很多招收充电宝投放的广告，某担保群也有人已经开设公群， 首先说一下这个项目的逻辑，无非就叫你去扫充电宝出来安装他们所谓的芯片，说是用户信息采集，这听起来很安全，也很好做。 安装一个芯片到充电宝就80U。但你要10张芯片起拿货，芯片研发成本高什么的。听起来符合逻辑利润又高没风险。用户采集何须用这种共享充电宝的套路呢，大数据一查一大把。 所开公群也是禁言交易状态，是怕你们发声讨伐吗？ 如果你真的交易了，有没有想过你交了这500U所谓的芯片钱是不是能拿到货，拿到货以后是不是就是所谓的芯片，到货既是成交完成。所开的担保公群也是不会担保线下交易的，你打纠纷都打不赢。简而言之就是骗你芯片押金的 希望大家选择项目谨慎切勿贪图利高，做以前先想想，凭什么。 又动了别人蛋糕了😀😀
❤2
行业黑话诠释：（小白必看篇） U：美元 1U约为7.1人名币 （具体以实时汇率为准） 供需：分为需求信息跟供应信息的转接频道 公群：一个拥有押金保障的群组可使你做单得到一定的保障 （注意分辨群组是否存在假押，辨别是否为假群，很多不良商家实行假押进行收割） 担保：一个中介平台，确保双方交易安全 承兑：人名币跟美元换汇商家 代收：收款 代付：付款 车队：人头卡 料主：外面盘口或者大的中介商 卡回卡：用银行卡收资金，再用银行卡回资金给商家银行卡 卡回U：用银行卡收资金，再用银行卡回U给商家 卡回码：用银行卡收资金，再用银行卡回资金给支付宝或者微信QQ 盘口：简称为老板，代表有实力的做单个人，或者做单团队，给的价格高于市场 手机口：分为有线跟无线 贴纸：分为扫楼与贴车等 上粉：通过数据把人上到第三方软件，例如微信，QQ，抖音，快手 常见的粉分为：色粉 赌博粉 相亲粉 兼职粉 三网：手机卡 租ID：租用…
❤3
任何添加钱包节点=诈骗 前有添加节点进假U显示余额 现有添加节点转账即盗U 据知情人透漏 近期出现一种新型盗U手法 通过能量免手续费的方式让你添加节点，号称添加节点即可使用低额手续费 tp钱包添加节点后 发起转账即可直接把你的U盗走 万变不离其宗 利用某些包装项目推广节点这颗雷 只要被表面迷惑添加就有很大概率中招 此类骗术可以归纳到空气币/假U 谨记：添加节点=诈骗
❤2
Telegram账号新型盗号手段解析 近期遭遇的六次Telegram盗号事件，彻底颠覆了我对传统盗号手法的认知。过去，通过短信验证码劫持登录设备的方式已逐渐被用户警惕——定期检查登录设备列表即可防范。 但当前攻击者已升级技术手段，采用代理服务器渗透的方式实现远程操控，这种攻击方式具有以下特征： 隐蔽性极强 攻击者并非直接登录账号，而是通过操控用户设备连接的代理服务器实现间接控制。此时登录设备列表不会显示异常，但左下角盾牌图标会提示代理状态（建议定期检查该标识）。 技术原理推测 可能通过钓鱼Wi-Fi、恶意软件或供应链攻击劫持设备代理设置，使Telegram流量经攻击者服务器中转，从而获取会话密钥。 防御方案 立即进入Telegram设置→隐私与安全→禁用所有代理连接 删除不明来源的代理配置（尤其注意socks5/http代理项） 启用两步验证（2FA）作为最后防线 特别提醒：若发现盾牌图标异常…
❤3
在你做成一件事之前，没人想了解你的过去。 各位兄弟加油，真心祝愿每一个还在苦苦支撑的兄弟上岸。
❤6
祖国放心 强国有我 9/3阅兵 依然坚守岗位
❤4
小心假仿
最近不知道哪里出了一个星链透视系统，盗相册清空钱包。可以伪装成IM、VPN、博彩娱乐、免费接码、播放器等APP，而且此系统加入智能转账系统，当用户资产达到骗子设置的数额，就会自动转走。下载开启权限后，你的手机后台不管是相册还是个人隐私将一览无余，骗子会利用你的信息进行敲诈。 各位兄弟们在飞机还得多多谨慎，遇到私信推台，还是说要帮忙下载软件的，都要长个心眼，不要因为蝇头小利导致需要破财消灾。
真假担保自辨，做单擦亮眼睛做好甄别
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @feijibk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,078,859 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@feijibk named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“业务避坑指南” (@feijibk), 2,945 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feijibk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.