Engagement
11 posts held, back to 5 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 80.2%
- avg views ÷ 81 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 65.0
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
12 Oct 2026, 16:20 UTC16 viewsread 12 October 2026 Forwarded from @zjxqqbgkPhoto
【老师艺名】: 钱多多
【联系方式】: Qi an duo duo 81
【验证留名】: frank
【验证时间】: 10.10
【上课价位】: 1200p p
【颜值身材】: 9
【服务内容】: 课表上的都有
【服务态度】:10
【优点缺点】: 胸只有B，没到C
【推荐程度】: 10
【体验细节】:忘记看消息，迟到了1个多小时，感谢姐姐等我。风驰电掣冲到姐姐楼下，进门的那一刻，姐姐微笑迎接，没有过多的语言，直接脱衣服进浴室，调好水温，就开始水中萧互动起来，洗得很认真，还来了一个心中箫。擦干身进房间，房间开着氛围灯，很有情调感，姐姐铺好一次性毛巾让我趴着，开始服务咯，AB面都服务的很到位。各项服务都非常认真，没有一点敷衍。深喉差点就要出了，快快让老师戴上那阻隔千子万孙的透明袋，开始上高速，进入收费站后，从20码飙到150码，涡轮增加速就是快，越来越爽，搞得发动机里润滑油不断的喷。开了一段时间，到服务站换老师开，姐姐刚开始很温柔，…
12 Oct 2026, 09:51 UTC72 viewsread 12 October 2026 Video
Video, posted without a caption
12 Oct 2026, 09:10 UTC80 viewsread 12 October 2026 Photo
新频道，滴滴哦😍😍😍😍
Channel name was changed to «湛江💕钱多多❤️🈶🛖»
12 Oct 2026, 08:47 UTC80 viewsread 12 October 2026 之前频道被封了，😱哥哥们关注这个频道哈
Channel name was changed to «湛江💕钱多多❤️带🛖»
12 Oct 2026, 08:46 UTC77 viewsread 12 October 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «湛江钱多多❤️新»
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «专业小红书»
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @feifeizhanghao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“湛江💕钱多多❤️🈶🛖” (@feifeizhanghao), 81 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feifeizhanghao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
