Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The NSFW Feeshy Photo Gallery

Channel

The NSFW Feeshy Photo Gallery

@feeshyphotosAD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

184subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001198637907
TypeChannel
Username@feeshyphotosAD
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/feeshyphotosAD

Growth

1821841837 August 2026 — 182 subscribers8 August 2026 — 182 subscribers15 August 2026 — 184 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 182–184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:44184+2
8 Aug 2026, 12:46182no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:18182first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9574.2%
🔥1713.3%
🥰118.59%
😍32.34%
👍10.781%
😈10.781%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC850 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fxbsky.app/profile/saedis.bsky.social/post/3mqhmdfs23s2i

🔥6

1 Jun 2026, 13:52 UTC298 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fxbsky.app/profile/nebaka.bsky.social/post/3mna7xjsfik2a

3😍2

12 May 2026, 04:24 UTC252 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @HansArtChannelPhoto

The FWA rubberfurs meets just keeps growing every year!! And everyone looks amazing 😍 HUGE thank you to Raymond Feesh, Hex and Krum for helping with this photo! It's sure turned into a production

11

10 May 2026, 13:24 UTC≈2,190 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fxbsky.app/profile/toruiad.bsky.social/post/3mliqs6zmzs2z

9😍1

2 May 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,360 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fxbsky.app/profile/doublebisko.bsky.social/post/3mkutxjzhkk2v

6🔥1

1 Apr 2026, 07:54 UTC≈1,940 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fxbsky.app/profile/aruku.dog/post/3mig7gnutdk25

5

29 Mar 2026, 20:37 UTC896 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fxbsky.app/profile/latonex.cc/post/3mi7yedvs722p

6🔥1

28 Feb 2026, 19:25 UTC984 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fxbsky.app/profile/chasermcnub.bsky.social/post/3mfwwcvb6zk2k

7🔥2

19 Feb 2026, 02:47 UTC≈1,870 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fxbsky.app/profile/chipthepony.bsky.social/post/3mf6aqqq6cs2l

🔥7

3 Feb 2026, 10:27 UTC352 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AdventCatRolDurendalPhoto

Hey, loser 🤪 You know what L sign means, right? ———— Photo by Raymond Feesh 🦋: raymond.fee.sh 🦣: rubber.social/@StingrayAD ☕️: ko-fi.com/raymondfeesh SFW: @feeshyphotos

4🥰1😈1

3 Feb 2026, 10:27 UTC261 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AdventCatRolDurendalPhoto

Just a little bit... different this time ———— Photo by Raymond Feesh 🦋: raymond.fee.sh 🦣: rubber.social/@StingrayAD ☕️: ko-fi.com/raymondfeesh SFW: @feeshyphotos

2🥰1

19 Jan 2026, 19:16 UTC≈3,500 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fxbsky.app/profile/chipthepony.bsky.social/post/3mcsdjzci622f

🥰5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @feeshyphotosAD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The NSFW Feeshy Photo Gallery” (@feeshyphotosAD), 184 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feeshyphotosAD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.