Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

普陀区叶子

@feel19888

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,373subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002063303626
TypeChannel
Username@feel19888
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/feel19888

Growth

4,3664,3774,371.56 August 2026 — 4,366 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,370 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,377 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,373 subscribers4,3736 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,364–4,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:064,373-4
9 Aug 2026, 20:314,377+7
7 Aug 2026, 05:244,370+4
6 Aug 2026, 20:054,366first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 4,373 subscribers
Avg views / post
701
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held17 (30 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total7,010
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC305 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 上海补习班👉 @qgsh5 【评价时间】: 2026-08-07 【评价人】: 匿名 【评价老师】: 叶子 【人照评分】: 9.0 【颜值评分】: 9.0 【身材评分】: 9.0 【态度评分】: 9.0 【服务评分】: 9.0 【环境评分】: 9.0 【描述过程】: 交通非常方便,就在地铁站附近。老师颜值高,身材火辣,尤其是胸部又大又挺。服务包含陪洗,可以选丝袜制服,不过我没选,觉得老师全裸的样子更好看。AB面服务都有,全程配合度很高,最后顺利走人。

1

6 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC474 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎉 普陀【叶子 @wt19888】老师福利 🎁 奖品清单 • 五折优惠劵 × 2 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 上海修车协会 • 加入 普陀区叶子 • 加入 TG中文导航搜索 • 需消耗修车币:10 • 必须设置用户名 🔮 祝福加持 • 祝福消耗:188修车币 • 祝福上限:无上限次 • 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号,提高中奖率 ⌛ 抽选时刻 • 2026-08-09 12:00:00 📜 抽奖说明 刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、撤回内容等,一律视为无效发言,不计入统计! 再次重申:灌水无意义发言都不兑奖!请用心交流。 活动最终解释权归上海修车协会管理团队所有。 中奖的联系 老师 约时间 工兵优惠出击必须写报告 24小时内预约时间,三天内出击,过时自动作废 炸号需找管理验证,无法验证,奖品放回奖池重新抽奖 中奖需本人出击不得转让 中将联系:@wt19888 ✨ 愿命运之剑指引你们前行,直至胜利之光照耀每一个人。

1

5 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC628 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号:H178573577083 🎰 叶子半价票 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 🌺本次活动由叶子老师赞助🌺 禁止刷屏、否则禁言,连续发言.一律视为无效发言,! 特别声明 水够发言不在群内发言的中奖无效不予兑换 活动最终解释权归团管理团队所有。 中奖的联系 老师 约时间 24小时内预约时间,七天内出击,过时自动作废 💁 参与情况:11达标 / 26报名 🔋 人品加成:5票 ⚡️× 9 🎅 联系领奖:@wt19888 1. 旭贵zero⚡️⚡️ 奖品:半价票 祝大家心想事成好运连连!

2

3 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC839 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎰 叶子半价票 📮 参与条件: 🎫 加入-上海修车补习班免费上榜 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 20 条 🎫 加入-普陀区叶子 🎫 加入-上海修车补习班《老师榜单》 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 半价票 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 🌺本次活动由叶子老师赞助🌺 禁止刷屏、否则禁言,连续发言.一律视为无效发言,! 特别声明 水够发言不在群内发言的中奖无效不予兑换 活动最终解释权归团管理团队所有。 中奖的联系 老师 约时间 24小时内预约时间,七天内出击,过时自动作废 🔋 人品加成:⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年08月05日 14时04分00秒

1 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC875 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

上海修车社区报告: https://t.me/+fmTnMmZnJVQ5MTk1 【个人评价】 #好评 【人照几成】:9 【验证留名】:zaiqe 【验证时间】:8.1 【联系方式】:@wt19888 【所在位置】:#普陀 【修车水费】:900pp 【身高体重】:165 【服务态度】:非常好 【优点缺点】:这是第二次来找叶子老师了。交通方便,就在地铁站附近,旁边也有银行。老师的长相更像第一张照片吧,开了点美颜和瘦脸吧,真人也挺好看的,有一点肉,比较丰满但是并不胖。老师家里挺干净的,交了水费以后就去洗浴了,全程老师来帮忙洗,好评。有很多制服可以挑选,有学生装、开档丝袜等。第一p口硬女上出货,口活很好。中间休息的时候聊了会天,老师是个话痨。之后开始做漫游正反面服务,可以要求dl,比较浅,第二p后入结束,屁股很有撞击感。事后也帮忙冲了下澡。总之,非常推荐,不会踩雷。 【温馨提醒】:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @feel19888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 640,403 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“普陀区叶子” (@feel19888), 4,373 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feel19888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.