Channel
@feedbackaptis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 2 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004300474872 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @feedbackaptis |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/feedbackaptis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:34 | 6 | no change |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:22 | 6 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 October 2026 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 516 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Nov 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Assalomu alaykum. Ustoz sizga katta rahmat, ochig'i men bunaqa darslar kutmagandim. Hammasini juda zo'r tushunayapman. 4 oy oflayn ingliz tiliga borib o'rganolmagan darslarimni sizni 1 oylik kursizda o'rganayapman. Bergan bilimlarizga rozi bo'ling , inshaaloh c1 natijalar bn imtihondan o'tamiz.
Assalomu alaykum ustoz online kurs juda manfaatli foydali boldi bergan bilimingiz uchun sizga katta rahmat Allohim ishlarizni rivojini bersin Hudo xoxlasa C1 natijalarni olib xursand bolish nasib qilsin
Assalomu alaykum, tuliq qo'shilaman vaqtni boy bermay kursga qo'shiling agar kurs qidirib yurgan bo'lsangiz faqat va faqat shu kursni oling haqiqiy bilimlar hazinasi man yana qayta sotib oldim o'tgan yil birinchi ochilgan oktyabr kursida o'qigandim ma'lumotlar materiallar rossa zo'r mazza qilib o'qiydigan kurs manga eng yoqqani tartib zo'r, materiallarning har xil ko'rinishida berilganligi gapirsam gap tugamaydi hull…
❤1
Assalom alekum kurs juda ajoyib. Aptis imtihoni hawida hech qanday malumotga ega emas edim.Lekin 1 oylik kursni uzi 1- martada B2natijani qulga kiritishimga yetarli buldi.Rahmat katta.
Kurs haqiqatan ham ajoyib! 😍🔥 Darslar juda sifatli, tushunarli va mukammal tarzda tashkil etilgan. Eng yoqqan tomoni — barcha kerakli ma’lumotlar, foydali materiallar, video darslar va har qanday savolga batafsil javoblar mavjud. Hammasi bir joyda jamlangan, o‘rganish esa juda qulay! 💯 Bu shunchaki kurs emas, balki haqiqiy natijaga erishish uchun ajoyib imkoniyat! 📚✨ Darslar davomida olgan bilimlaringizni amalda qo‘…
Assalomu alekum man Teacher Shoxrux ustozni oktabrdagi Aptis guruhida o'qib judayam kop malumotlar va foydali materillar orqali juda katta foyda olyapman chunki hali kursni toliq organib tugatmadim.Kurs juda tartibli va alohida mocklar practice qilish uchun alohida ishlab chiqilgan web saytlarga vapshe gap yoq ustoz kattakon rahmat!!!!!
Assalomu aleykum yaxshimisiz ustoz! Manam B2 oldim sentabrda! Writing 42 speaking 40 buldi. Siz aytgan barcha texnikalarni qo'llab shu natijaga erishdim.Nasib bu safar C1 olaman siz bilan tayyorlanib! Listening bilan reading uncha tayyorlanmagandim. Bu safar yanada kuchli tayyorlanaman. Kurs tugashiga qaramay bepul testlar beryapsiz. Allohim ishizni rivojini bersin!! 🤲🤲🤲
Assalomu alaykum yaxshimisiz teacher. Sizning aptis online kursizda o’qib yaxshi natija olganman. O’sha payti sertifikat juda zarur edi. Eng qizigi vaqtim ozligiga ko’p shug’ullanolmay imtixonga kirib ketkanman. Va yuqori natija olib chiqqanman. Ish soatimni saqlab qolganman. Qo’shimchasiga ustama ham olganman. Hudo hohlasa yana kursalaringizda o’qib, yana imtixon topshirib ko’rmoqchiman aptistka
Assalom alaykum, menga sizning kursingiz juda manfa'tli bo'ldi, chunki darslarizda mukamallik bor. Shaxsan menga, ishga kirish un B2 sertifikati zarur edi 2023- yilda online kursizga BEPUL qushgansiz 1 oy kursizni mustaqil uqib B2 olganman 1-urinishda, onalik tatilidan keyin qiyin bulgan dars qilish, ammo oson yunalishiz tufayli uddalaganman. Tayyor kursizni tanimagan insonga tekinga qushgansiz, sizga hurmatim oshgan…
Self study qivoman yana siz yuborgan materiallar bn. Inshallah target natija qilishim bilan yuboraman sizga.
Kurslariz zo'r tashkillashtirilgan. Online kursizdan olgan bilimlarni Offline kurslardan ham topa olmaganman. 👍👍👍👍
Toʻgʻrisini aytsam sizni kursez supper.Ayniqsa speaking va writing strukturalariga gap boʻlishi mn emas .Sizning kursingiz ishonch bn ayta olamanki natijaga oson erishishda eng sifatli kurslardan biridir
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @feedbackaptis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aptis Original course” (@feedbackaptis), 6 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feedbackaptis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.