Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 97 days, net +238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,553–11,958 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 14:08
11,901
-9
10 Nov 2026, 12:09
11,910
+3
8 Nov 2026, 20:09
11,907
+7
7 Nov 2026, 11:17
11,900
-1
5 Nov 2026, 10:24
11,901
-3
4 Nov 2026, 11:18
11,904
-4
3 Nov 2026, 14:40
11,908
-1
2 Nov 2026, 15:45
11,909
+5
1 Nov 2026, 12:17
11,904
-2
31 Oct 2026, 15:28
11,906
+14
30 Oct 2026, 15:56
11,892
-9
29 Oct 2026, 18:27
11,901
-3
28 Oct 2026, 15:57
11,904
-6
27 Oct 2026, 17:48
11,910
-1
26 Oct 2026, 18:26
11,911
+6
25 Oct 2026, 19:38
11,905
+1
24 Oct 2026, 18:50
11,904
+3
23 Oct 2026, 21:06
11,901
+12
22 Oct 2026, 18:57
11,889
-7
21 Oct 2026, 11:56
11,896
first reading
Engagement
55 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
76.1%
avg views ÷ 11,901 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,060
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 55 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
55 (24 June 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
90,550
Reactions total
3,727
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 09:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
209
Videos
20
Links
127
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
31s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,042 reactions across 55 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💋
9,968
41.5%
🔥
8,435
35.1%
🤡
5,639
23.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,042 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
132
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 55 we hold a reading for · 51%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @feanrir25. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
НЕБОЛЬШОЙ ПОДАРОК
Вы это просили, вы ждали этого и вот наконец в качестве небольшой компенсации отсутствия пятничной дурки, на бусти стала доступна вторая серия любовных похождений Воробьева, где он постарается отыскать свою принцессу среди остальных участниц. А первая в качестве ознакомительного просмотра теперь вообще бесплатная.
А посмотреть на продолжение этой дурнины, которая уже вторую серию подряд накидывает…
А ВОТ И НОВЫЕ ЛИЦА
Авторы в очередной раз поняли, что поток контента, на который способны нынешние участники, давно иссяк, поэтому практически под конец сезона внедряют новых персов.
Ну а получится ли с помощью них добавить чего-нибудь интересного в этот блядушник вы сможете узнать уже в 10 серии особняка милф.
Вот здесь.
САМЫЙ ВАЖНЫЙ ДЕНЬ В ЖИЗНИ
Спустя долги месяца ожиданий, потрепанных нервов и искалеченных судеб это день наконец настал. Референса у Биста с роликом о свадьбе не нашлось, так что выкручиваться пришлось самому. А мы с вами как и всегда уже в эту пятницу посмотрим на то, что же из этого вышло.
Вот здесь.
ДРАМАТИЧНАЯ ПОШЛЯТИНА
На бусти стала доступна для просмотра 9 серия 2 сезона осоняка старых и не очень паскудников.
Наконец фантазия создателей начала иссякать, поэтому в этот раз без конкурсов. Но нет худа без паскудства, которым участники продолжают давить друг друга и меня по совместительству. А вот что станет его итогом, вы узнаете
Здесь.
ОПЯТЬ ДВОЙНАЯ ПОРЦИЯ КРИНЖА
Для того чтобы в очередной раз перестать верить в любовь порой достаточно просто посмотреть на новоиспеченную ячейку общества в виде Клавы Коки и Димы Масленникова.
Поэтому мы по уже сложившейся традиции в эту пятницу посмотрим новое интервью у Собчак, гангстерские приключения Кизару и много чего другого.
А также в честь надвигающегося халувина в субботу, как и было обещано поиграем в к…
САМЫЕ СТРАШНЫЕ ЖУТИКИ
На бусти стал доступен для просмотра уже четвертый реакт посвященный всяким жутким видосам. И на этот раз вас ждет самый криповый выпуск из всех что были до этого.
Дешевую постанову и кривой монтаж со спецэффектами сразу видно, а эффект от скримеров быстро пропадает, но вот крипота, которая произошла с людьми в реальности и по огромной случайности была запечетлена на камеру дает совсем другой …
ОТМЕНЕННАЯ ЗА ТУПИЗНУ
Амбассадор отсутствия интеллекта и сапожек миу миу вновь наносит удар айсикью интернет пространству в новом выпуске Вопроса ребром.
Еще до выхода выпуска самой Генсучкой были высказаны опасения касательно того, что она там наговорила и какие последствия для нее это может принести в будущем. А мы с вами уже в эту пятницу пролицезреем, что же такого ужасного там могло случиться. И еще кучу всего…
КОГДА-НИБУДЬ ЭТО ЗАКОНЧИТСЯ
На бусти стала доступна 8 серия особняка милф, где любовно-мерзотные страсти продолжают эскалироваться, доходя до полнейшего абсурда.
И если вам показалось, что омерзительнее конкурса с поеданием арбузов из предыдущей серии уже быть не может, то поздравляю, вам действительно показалось. А вот чем именно удивят создатели и участники на этот раз уже можно посмотреть…
Вот здесь…
МИЛЫЙ КРИДУРОК
Постоянные попытки обернуть свою кринжу себе же в плюс безусловно заслуживают уважения. Жаль только что в большинстве подобных попыток итогом получается еще большая кринжа.
И вот уже в эту пятницу выходит потенциально легендарный релиз от милого ублюдка с одноименным названием, а вместе с ним и стрим, на котором мы этот опус и оценим.
Прям вот здесь.
ВОЗВРАЩЕНИЕ СТАРЫХ КАШЕЛОК
После небольшого перерыва на самую главную страдалицу интернета мы вновь возвращаемся к милфам в отчаянной попытке досмотреть их до конца, чтобы наконец перейти к холостяку с Воробьевым.
Поэтому на бусти стала доступна 7 серия 2 сезона особняка милф, где вас буду ждать новые участницы, а также старые добрые извращенские конкурсы, по которым абсолютно никто НЕ скучал.
Смотреть здеся.
🔥178💋47🤡21
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @feanrir25. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@feanrir25 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @feanrir25 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“feanrir” (@feanrir25), 11,901 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feanrir25.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
