Channel
@fctanalytics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,281subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001682407970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fctanalytics |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fctanalytics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 1,281 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 1,283 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 1,284 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:20 | 1,284 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 June 2025 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 241 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
44 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 24 | 54.5% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 45.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Interview conducted by Yan Yanovich Buzek Studio Zakázané Vzdělání July 12, 2026 Valeriy Viktorovich Pyakin for CS, June 2026 This interview explores the relationship between states and corporations and explains why heads of state cannot always act as they wish and implement their intended policies, even when they genuinely want to serve their countries and their people. The full original video in Russian can be f…
🔥2👍1
Interview conducted by Ainis Kazimirovich Petkus Studio Perspektiva June 28, 2026 Valeriy Viktorovich Pyakin: ZOMBIE SOCIETY — THE DREAM OF THE GLOBAL "ELITES"! This interview explores the relationship between states and corporations, examining how corporations can be used as instruments of supranational governance and how they interact differently with historically established states and smaller states with limite…
🔥1
Past Traumas Continue to Haunt Britain's Puppet Masters SVR of Russia Press Bureau, July 6, 2026 The Press Bureau of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation (SVR) reports that, according to information currently being received by the SVR, the high-profile strike on the Museum of the Defense of Sevastopol in June of this year was a carefully planned provocation orchestrated by London and its intel…
👍4🔥2
Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson on the West’s desire to destroy Russia: I hope there is nobody left in Russia that harbors the illusion that somehow the West is seeking a peaceful negotiated outcome. No, absolutely not. The West wants to destroy Russia. They’re intent on that. The rhetoric has become more intense. And what’s really bizarre is the—how the media coverage now is really portraying Russia as on its bac…
🔥4
The International Affairs Journal - Archive of Issue No. 11 (2025) Burn All the Way to the English Channel? On Effective Security Guarantees in the Context of the Historical Confrontation Between Russia and the West Dmitry Demurin Deputy Director, Second Department of the CIS Countries, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Anton Postigov Head of Division, Second Department of the CIS Countries, Mi…
🔥1
❗️A detailed response by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Viktorovich Lavrov to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s comments on the Anchorage negotiations has been published. Indeed, we have been receiving a considerable number of questions on this matter. It is imperative to elucidate the situation as we perceive it. I trust this will provide clarity for our audience. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio asserted th…
👍1🔥1
What does the Central Bank of Russia’s 0.25% key interest rate cut really signify? What political circumstances in Russia and around the world led to this rate cut? Why is the Central Bank of Russia’s entire policy serving the interests of the West? How are Elvira Nabiullina’s statement about raising the key interest rate and the Ukrainian drone strike on a bus carrying Belorussian children in Bryansk Oblast conne…
🔥1
“If America loses its unquestioned military edge, no amount of fiscal austerity can maintain this nation’s economic health,” U.S. War Minister, Pete Hegseth, wrote in his op-ed, “We Must Spend Big on Defense to Save America’s Economic Might,” published in the New York Post on Tuesday, June 23, 2026. The article argues in support of allocating $1.5 trillion for Pentagon spending in 2027. The article explicitly lays o…
Forwarded from Koty i koshka Kramnika The next time someone claims, “Russia is appropriating the history of the Great Patriotic War, even though it has no right to—it was the Soviet Union, not Russia,” you can simply reply with this Der Spiegel cover. The Germans know perfectly well who they were fighting.
Forwarded from Varfolomey Gorshenin When a minister with diplomas and academic titles thinks like an intellectually limited vocational-school graduate, he starts publicly spouting such nonsense that normal people are not even sure how to comment on it. “There are too many people with higher education in Russia,” declared Minister of Science and Higher Education Falkov. To put this into perspective: the Soviet Unio…
139 years passed. And it is symbolic that on June 18, Minister of Science and Higher Education Valeriy Falkov stated that: “There are too many people with higher education in Russia.” According to him, the country does not need “universal higher education,” and the mass aspiration of graduates to enter universities “is not a good thing” and does not correspond to the needs of the economy—the country, he argued, nee…
Forwarded from Yaroslav Listov, the historian A Coincidence — or Lessons Not Learned? There are strange coincidences in Russian history—here is one of them. On June 14, 1887, Minister of Education Ivan Delyanov signed the circular “On the Reduction of Gymnasium Education,” which went down in history as the circular about the “cook’s children.” It was not only about the statement that: “Gymnasiums and progymnasiums…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fctanalytics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,099,991 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Politics_Analytics_FCT (FKT) 🌎🌍🌏” (@fctanalytics), 1,281 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fctanalytics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.