⚽️ U19 Chempionatida 11-tur bahslari davom ettirildi ♻️ Artel | 💙 Uzcard | ⚫️ Apex | 🔴 Coca-Cola | 🔵 BMB | 🟠 Allplay

Channel
FCNAVBAHOR | Rasmiy kanal
@fcnavbahor
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
8,629subscribers
+555 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001106805321 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fcnavbahor |
| Created | 6 February 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fcnavbahor |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 8,629 | +48 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 8,581 | +33 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 8,548 | -22 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 8,570 | +66 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:03 | 8,504 | +10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 8,494 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 8,498 | +41 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 8,457 | +80 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 8,377 | +12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 8,365 | +28 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 8,337 | +95 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 8,242 | +76 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 8,166 | +79 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 8,087 | +13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 8,074 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 8,074 | first reading |
Engagement
131 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 131 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 48m 47s
- Average length
- 1m 45s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
916 reactions across 98 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 384 | 41.9% | |
| 👍 | 210 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 144 | 15.7% | |
| 🎉 | 49 | 5.35% | |
| 🏆 | 46 | 5.02% | |
| 😁 | 41 | 4.48% | |
| 😢 | 39 | 4.26% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.328% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 928 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔴 O‘zbekiston kubogi. Nimchorak finalga yo'l olgan jamoalar bu bosqichda nechanchi bor qatnashayotgani bilan tanishamiz ♻️ Artel | 💙 Uzcard | ⚫️ Apex | 🔴 Coca-Cola | 🔵 BMB | 🟠 Allplay
🏆3❤1
Эътиборингиз учун раҳмат, азиз мухлислар!
🔥3
Аёллар футболи. Биринчи лига. 13-тур. "Навбаҳор-Women" — "Тўмарис" - 4:4. Голлар: Сарвиноз Дилмуродова (14), Намунабону Жалолова(33), Муштарийбегим Салоҳиддинова (45,55) -Согдиана Машарипова (18), Шаҳризода Кенжаева (20), Барчиной Эшмуротова (51,90+4). #Tugadi.
Учрашув якунланди. Унда жанговар дуранг-4:4 ҳисоби қайд этилди.
90+4-дақиқада меҳмонлар стандарт вазиятдан сўнг, ҳисобни тенглаштиришди. "Тўмарис" сардори Барчиной Эшмуротова 25 метрлар чамаси узоқликдан белгиланган жарима зарбасини аниқ амалга оширди-4:4.
Гол!
90+3-дақиқада Гулёра Валиева огоҳлантирилди.
90+3-дақиқада аёллар жамоамиз таркибида илк ўзгариш юз берди. Умида Эгамбердиева ўрнига Ёдгора Разакова захирадан майдонга тушди.
90+2-дақиқада Муштарийбегим Салоҳиддинованинг зарбасидан сўнг, тўпни меҳмонлар дарвозабони Умида Матқурбонова қайтарди.
Учрашувнинг асосий вақтига тўхталишлар учун 4 дақиқа қўшиб берилди.
89-дақиқада меҳмонлар таркибида илк ўзгариш юз берди. Маржона Абдукаримова ўрнига Динара Янгибоева захирадан майдонга тушди.
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @fcnavbahor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fcnavbahor edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@NAVBAHORNEWS · 83,711
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
@fcnasaf · 43,210
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
@pfcneftchi_uz · 35,708
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
@andijonpfc · 20,560
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 September 2026
@OZBEKISTON_FUTBOLI_LIVE · 32,689
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
@uzpfl · 59,131
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
@superliga_neftchi_andijon_nasaf · 69,162
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
@FCANJAN · 24,860
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
@khumoyunborz · 26,027
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 4 September 2026
@championatasia · 98,344
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@superliganews · 29,548
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
@kunutunfutbol · 34,749
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 1 September 2026
@FAUzbekistan · 60,950
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@namangan_ish_bor_elon_reklamalar · 251,558
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 August 2026
@NAMANGAN_RADAR · 61,859
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 21 August 2026
@uzpfl_paxtakor_Navbahor_Neftchii · 22,950
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
@PenaltyNarzulla · 25,204
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
@namanganliklar_uz · 519,750
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 August 2026
@olamsportcom · 45,285
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@namvilhok · 21,633
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 September 2026
@milliyfutbolimizuzb · 36,404
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 7 September 2026
@boxinguzbekistan · 20,684
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
@daryo_sport24 · 31,425
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
@vodiy_times · 139,404
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…Официальный сайт клуба — pfcnavbahor.uz] * [https://t.me/NAVBAHORNEWS Официальный канал клуба в Telegram — t.me/fcnavbahor] * [https://www.instagram.com/fcnavbahor_/…”
read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FCNAVBAHOR | Rasmiy kanal” (@fcnavbahor), 8,629 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fcnavbahor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.