Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ФК ЛНЗ

@fclnz

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

5,411subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001465516605
TypeChannel
Username@fclnz
Description✅Офіційний акаунт футбольного клубу ЛНЗ Черкаси м. Черкаси, вул. О. Дашковича, 19, 18007 press@fc-lnz.com +380979941129 R40-05976
Created15 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fclnz

Growth

5,4085,4115,409.56 August 2026 — 5,408 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,408 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,410 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,411 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,408–5,411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:325,411+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:245,410+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:365,408no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:505,408first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 5,411 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,760
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held29 (3 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total51,098
Reactions total1,464
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,480
Videos
1,100
Links
1,650

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 23s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,279 reactions across 26 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
50139.2%
👍29122.8%
😢13310.4%
😁786.10%
💔695.39%
😱665.16%
custom 5431449001532594346534.14%
🔥423.28%
🤯241.88%
👏201.56%
🥰20.156%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,464reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 29 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fclnz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC878 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

2 тур | Карпати - ЛНЗ

24😁7😢6🔥4👍1

11 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,450 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

13.08 | 20:00 - ЗУСТРІЧ ІЗ ГЕНЕРАЛЬНИМ ДИРЕКТОРОМ, ГОЛОВНИМ ТРЕНЕРОМ ТА ГРАВЦЯМИ💜 Запрошуємо вболівальників на зустріч із генеральним директором, головним тренером та футболістами ФК ЛНЗ! 🗓 13 серпня ⏰ 20:00 📍 ресторан FABRICA NOIRE На вас чекають презентація нової форми сезону 2026/27, живе спілкування з командою та розіграш призів⚡️ 🎟Реєстрація за посиланням: https://forms.gle/177Fba16X6Ma57Cf8 Кількість місць

32👍5custom 54314490015325943463😁2

11 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,580 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎙️Захисник ЛНЗ Назарій Муравський в ефірі УПЛ.ТБ прокоментував матч із Карпатами: – Назарію, напевно, все ж таки складно давати свій коментар після таких поєдинків, але попрошу Вас прокоментувати, якою цю гру побачили саме Ви? – Дуже важка гра, вона нагадує гру минулорічного сезону, коли ми тут грали, вона була практично до голу. Пощастило сьогодні більше Карпатам забити першими. Десь трошки емоційно стійкішими вони

👍356😁3🤯1custom 54314490015325943461

10 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC≈1,700 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📹Післяматчева пресконференція | Карпати - ЛНЗ | Віталій Пономарьов https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaqbrpWE4jk

👍16😁2😢2🤯1

10 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC≈2,040 views137 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Поразка у Львові

😱56😢35🔥14😁14💔9👍42👏1

10 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,980 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

86ʼ Гол! Рахунок 3:0 Гол забив Вієйра

😢27😁18👍4💔2🔥2🤯1

10 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈1,880 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

77ʼ Гол! Рахунок 2:0 Гол забив Калеро

👏18🤯15😢7😁51👍1💔1

10 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈1,900 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

72ʼ Заміна. Поле покинули Ассінор та Драмбаєв, замість них вийшли К. Девід та Микитишин

🔥83custom 54314490015325943462👍1😱1

10 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC≈1,900 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

67ʼ Гол! Карпати відкривають рахунок у матчі. Гол забив Бабогло

😢31😁11👍2😱2🔥1🤯1

10 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,860 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

56’ Заміна. Таллес Б. замінив Пастуха

👍8😁5🔥1custom 54314490015325943461

10 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,880 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

46’ Розпочався другий тайм

11👍2custom 54314490015325943461

10 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,920 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

45ʼ Перерва

👍197😢5😁3custom 54314490015325943462🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @fclnz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 213,301 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

News⚡️Cherkassy
@news_chrkssy · 158,125
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
Труха⚡️Черкаси
@truexacherkasi · 168,090
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
🇺🇦 Ігор Табурець | Начальник Черкаської ОВА
@cherkaskaODA · 259,520
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q55189861 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelFC LNZ Cherkasy
Descriptionfootball club
YouTubeUCumJyL4ibyC53_Dfd55882w
Official sitehttp://fc-lnz.com/

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Сезон ФК «Кривбас» 2023—2024 (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…|title=Орендуємо нападника 29-річного Хобленка Олексія|url=https://t.me/fclnz/4091|website=t.me/fclnz}} |- |} === Зимове трансферне вікно === ==== Прийшли…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФК ЛНЗ” (@fclnz), 5,411 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fclnz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.