Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فاضل نظری

Channel

فاضل نظری

@fazelnazariii

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,567subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001008122218
TypeChannel
Username@fazelnazariii
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fazelnazariii

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,5611,5671,5646 August 2026 — 1,561 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,563 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,564 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,561 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,566 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 21 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,560–1,568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 07:391,567+1
20 Aug 2026, 09:261,566+5
17 Aug 2026, 12:131,561-3
13 Aug 2026, 18:181,564+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:311,563+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:161,561first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 1,567 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (5 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,864
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 46s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC211 viewsread 7 August 2026

دیر یا زود این عذاب ای جان به پایان می‌رسد شاد باش! این رنج بی‌پایان به پایان می‌رسد گرچه گاهی تندبادی شاخه‌ای را هم شکست سرو می‌ماند ولی توفان به پایان می‌رسد زندگی بر مردم آزادۀ بی‌آرزو سخت می‌گیرد ولی آسان به پایان می‌رسد داستان شمع با آتش روایت شد ولی عاقبت با دیدۀ گریان به پایان می‌رسد سیل آه خلق سدّ ظلم را خواهد شکست قصۀ تاریخ بی‌سلطان به پایان می‌رسد ✍🏻#فاضل_نظری 📚#وجود 📝#امیدواری Telegram.me/fazelnaz

31 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC222 viewsread 7 August 2026

گرچه به غیر از زیان ندیده ام از تو شکر که راضی نبوده‌ام به کم از تو با توسر جان قمار کرده ام ای عشق هرچه مرا هست و هرچه نیست هم از تو سایه خود را نگاه کن که بدانی همسفرت جا نمانده یک قدم از تو ای دم عشرت! نه اینکه یاد تو خوش نیست هست، ولی دلرباتر است غم از تو پنجره های سکوت نیمه شب از من نغمهٔ گنجشک‌های صبحدم از تو ✍🏻#فاضل_نظری 📚#وجود 📝#پنجره‌ی‌سکوت https://telegram.me/fazelnazariii

23 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC419 viewsread 7 August 2026

بر سر سجاده می‌افتاد چشمم تا به می شیشه می با دهان باز می‌پرسید: کی؟ کاش از اول بر در میخانه می‌خواندم نماز حیف از آن عمری که شد در گوشه‌ی محراب طی ناله‌ی جانسوز من بود آنچه می‌آمد به گوش آه من بود آنچه یکدم زیر لب می‌خواند نی کاش با ساقی حسابم پاک می‌شد، سال‌هاست او به من جامی بدهکار است و من جانی به وی من خطایی کمتر از بخشایشت دارم، ببخش با توام ای یار! ای غمخوار! ای «بسیار ای»! ✍🏻#فاضل_نظری 📚#وجود 📝#بسیارای

22 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC437 viewsread 7 August 2026

نیست آسان سخن سخت شنیدن گرچه می‌پذیرم ز تو گر هرچه بگویی هرچه دل به جز خواستۀ دوست چه می‌خواهد؟ هیچ ما گذشتیم ز خیر تو! بگو دیگر چه؟ خاطر موج، پریشان و دل ساحل، سنگ فرض کن باز هم اصرار کنم، آخر چه؟ می‌توان مثل دو رود از دو طرف رفت ولی باز اگر بازرسیدیم به یکدیگر چه؟ گفتم ای دوست مرا بی‌خبر از خود مگذار گفت و بد گفت که از بی‌خبری خوشتر چه ✍🏻#فاضل_نظری 📚#وجود 📝#نپذیرفتن https://telegram.me/fazelnazariii

19 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC518 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @beitmandegarPhoto

می‌توان همه چیز را از انسان گرفت مگر یک چیز: آزادی انسان در انتخاب رفتارش در هر شرایط و نیز انتخاب راه خود. 📚 کتاب: #انسان_در_جستجوی_معنا اثر :#ویکتور_فرانکل

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fazelnazariii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 45,939 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فاضل نظری” (@fazelnazariii), 1,567 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fazelnazariii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.