Channel
@fatpig_signalsofficial
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
928subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001633088061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fatpig_signalsofficial |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fatpig_signalsofficial |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @fat_pig_signalsofficial/321421 Apr 2026, 15:49 UTC | @fatpig_signalsofficial/2826 · this entry21 Apr 2026, 15:50 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @fat_pig_signalsofficial/321522 Apr 2026, 11:24 UTC | @fatpig_signalsofficial/2827 · this entry22 Apr 2026, 11:24 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @fat_pig_signalsofficial/321723 Apr 2026, 08:29 UTC | @fatpig_signalsofficial/2829 · this entry23 Apr 2026, 08:29 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @fat_pig_signalsofficial/321924 Apr 2026, 16:14 UTC | @fatpig_signalsofficial/2831 · this entry24 Apr 2026, 16:14 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @fat_pig_signalsofficial/322515 May 2026, 16:40 UTC | @fatpig_signalsofficial/2837 · this entry15 May 2026, 16:40 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @fat_pig_signalsofficial/322731 May 2026, 12:33 UTC | @fatpig_signalsofficial/2839 · this entry31 May 2026, 12:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @fat_pig_signalsofficial | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @fat_pig_signalsofficial (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 April 2026 to 4 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @fat_pig_signalsofficial. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 928 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 930 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:29 | 930 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Fat Pig Crypto Signals BTC: Rather than focusing on whether the current decline is already wave 3 to the downside or still only wave 1 , the more important factor at this stage is the resistance structure overhead. As long as the resistance levels continue to hold, there is no meaningful signal that a sustainable recovery has begun. The downside pressure remains elevated while the market trades below these key levels…
Fat Pig Crypto Signals BTC: From an Elliott Wave perspective, it is entirely possible that Bitcoin could temporarily fall below a well-known Power Law channel in a Wave 2 correction after completing a very large long-term uptrend. That would not necessarily mean Bitcoin has failed in the long run, nor would it automatically invalidate the broader Power Law concept. A subsequent Wave 3 could then bring price back into…
Fat Pig Crypto Signals Bitcoin and Gold are moving opposite right now. -0.88. Gold up, Bitcoin down. All year. When people get scared, they still pick gold over bitcoin. That is the message. The market is the boss. Not my opinion.
Fat Pig Crypto Signals BTC: Bitcoin appears to have started wave 5.
Fat Pig Crypto Signals ETH: Ethereum has now formed one more low, which means wave (c) looks technically complete. However, there is no upside reversal signal yet and the 100% extension target for wave (c) is at $2177, which is below the current price.
Fat Pig Crypto Signals BTC: The 21week EMA has acted as support level today.
Fat Pig Crypto Signals LINK: Chainlink remains in a moderate local uptrend from the February lows, with the white scenario still favoring higher prices in the short term. The next resistance zone remains between $11.50 and $12, where the market could face stronger selling pressure. Leading Scenario: The recent bounce from support keeps the local bullish structure intact for now. As long as Chainlink remains above $9…
Fat Pig Crypto Signals BTC: Bitcoin has still not found a clear local support level at the moment and has once again been rejected from the 100% extension region around $82,000. Looking at the daily chart, the next larger structural support comes in around $78,700, where the 21-week exponential moving average is currently located. Below that, the next important support region is around $74,500. Underneath this level…
Fat Pig Crypto Signals BTC: A new tool going live in the MCO Terminal tomorrow. The liquidation heatmap shows where leveraged positions would get liquidated. Bright bands cluster at price levels where many positions would be force-closed if the price reached them. These zones act as magnets because forced selling triggers cascades. Current BTC magnets: · Resistance: $83.4k (immediate), $84.2k, $88.3k · Support: $78.5…
Fat Pig Crypto Signals Bitcoin is flashing a bullish signal. Your Vector framework shows: * Momentum: At 1 → well above the +0.5 bullish threshold * Risk Index: Fully reset at 0 → low-risk environment This combination is notable: * Strong momentum confirmation * Minimal downside risk pressure Historically, this setup has aligned with major upside phases, while helping avoid drawdowns during bearish periods. Int…
Fat Pig Crypto Signals DOT: The price has extended its wave 2 pullback, but this is still a 3-wave decline and micro support is still holding. This is a 1-2 setup but please note the overall context is not bullish.
Fat Pig Crypto Signals Last 2 hours remaining for the confidential membership to end. After this we will be closing the gates forever. Keep in mind that the members inside the circle receive 1 on 1 mentorship in achieving your financial goal in trading and long term investing. 🔥🔥PRICING (Heavy Discount)🔥 Monthly- $199 (Was $699) 3 Months - $299 (Was $999) Yearly - $399 (Was $1999) Lifetime- $599 (Was $2999) 🔥JOININ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fatpig_signalsofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fat Pig signals ®️” (@fatpig_signalsofficial), 928 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fatpig_signalsofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.