Channel
@fatherman_id
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
36,000subscribers
-542 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001351916529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fatherman_id |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fatherman_id |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 36,000 | -66 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 36,066 | -30 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 36,096 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 36,105 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:45 | 36,120 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 36,133 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 36,152 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 36,168 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 36,185 | -19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 36,204 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 36,213 | -14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 36,227 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 36,244 | -33 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 36,277 | -23 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 36,300 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 36,308 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 36,320 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 36,333 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 36,345 | -38 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 36,383 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (29 July 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 28,401 |
| Reactions total | 61 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 13:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
88 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 63.6% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 19.3% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 7.95% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Alhamdulillah, melalui The Silent Man, para Ayah bisa menemukan ruang untuk berbagi cerita, bertukar pengalaman, sekaligus merefleksikan kembali perjalanan mereka dalam menjalankan peran sebagai seorang Ayah. Karena setiap Ayah punya cerita, perjuangan, dan prosesnya masing-masing. Dan terkadang, yang dibutuhkan bukan sekadar jawaban, tetapi ruang untuk merasa bahwa kita tidak sendirian. Terima kasih untuk para Ayah…
Ada masa ketika seorang laki-laki tidak tahu harus bercerita kepada siapa. Ia tetap bekerja meski pikirannya penuh. Tetap pulang dan tersenyum meski ada banyak hal yang belum selesai di dalam kepala. Tetap berusaha menjadi suami, ayah, dan sandaran bagi keluarganya, bahkan ketika dirinya sendiri sedang membutuhkan tempat untuk bersandar. Mari bergabung dengan circle positif para ayah: THE SILENT — FOR ALL MEN Specia…
❤3
Weekend nggak harus selalu pergi jauh atau mengeluarkan banyak biaya. Kadang, anak cuma butuh ayah yang mau duduk, bermain, ngobrol, dan ikut tertawa bersama. Apa saja? Yuk simak sampai akhir✨ Agar lebih paham yuk belajar ilmunya di buku Fatherman 1. Dapatkan sekarang di fatherman.id/1
Dengan bahasa yang ringan dan cerita yang dekat dengan kehidupan sehari-hari, Fatherman bisa menjadi pilihan untuk Ayah Bunda yang ingin mulai membaca tanpa merasa sedang “dipaksa” untuk membaca. Sebab, mungkin bukan Ayah Bunda yang tidak suka membaca. Bisa jadi, Ayah Bunda hanya belum menemukan cerita yang tepat untuk dibaca. Nantikan POnya. Dapatkan aksesnya di fatherman.id/1
❤2
Kalau sudah seperti ini, mesti gimana? Jawabannya ada di the silent man season 3. Coming soon..
Mari belajar memahami laki-laki, bukan hanya dari apa yang ia katakan, tetapi juga dari apa yang ia simpan dalam diam. Bersama “Ther Silent Man” Coming soon season 3 ✨
❤1
Ayah yang dekat dengan anak bukan soal selalu punya banyak waktu. Tapi soal mau hadir, mendengarkan, bermain, dan menikmati momen sederhana bersama anak. Karena buat anak, kehadiran ayah itu berarti. Tidak harus jadi ayah yang sempurna. Cukup terus belajar untuk lebih dekat. Temukan cerita dan panduan menjadi ayah di buku Fatherman 1. 👉 Pesan sekarang di https://fatherman.orderonline.id/fatherman1po
Dear, Istri. Baca surat ini. Barangkali, ada bagian yang selama ini ingin ia sampaikan, tetapi belum pernah mampu ia ucapkan. Dan jika setelah membacanya kamu teringat pada suamimu, mungkin sudah waktunya mengajaknya hadir di The Silent Man. Karena terkadang, seorang laki-laki tidak membutuhkan banyak pertanyaan. Ia hanya membutuhkan ruang yang membuatnya merasa aman untuk mulai bercerita.
❤6👍5🔥1
Pengasuhan butuh 2 peran yang “saling”. Bagaimana cara agar keduanya berperan? Simak penjelasannya berikut ini.
❤3
Menjadi ayah tak butuh sekedar teori tapi juga pengalaman dan mengamalan ilmu yang sesuai kebutuhan anak. Bagaimana sesungguhnya peran ayah dalam pengasuhan? Bagaimana cara menyeimbangkan waktu dan kualitas pengasuhan pada anak? Dapatkan jawabannya di buku Fatherman 1. Segera hadir PO buku fatherman 1 Harga promo 79.000 (berlaku sampai 5 September 2026) Pesan sekarang di https://fatherman.orderonline.id/fatherman1p…
❤2
Kalau versi ayah bunda gimana? Komen di bawah yaa😄
❤2
Kira-kira bulan ini kita PO buku apa ya Ayah Bunda? Yuk komen di bawah😊
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @fatherman_id. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@fatherman_id edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FATHERMAN” (@fatherman_id), 36,000 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fatherman_id.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.