Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отец лжи🌘™

Channel

Отец лжи🌘™

@father_oflies

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,201subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001195837376
TypeChannel
Username@father_oflies
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/father_oflies

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

2,2012,2252,2136 August 2026 — 2,225 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,225 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,223 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,222 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,221 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,222 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,221 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,219 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,217 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,212 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,210 subscribers25 September 2026 — 2,208 subscribers4 October 2026 — 2,207 subscribers11 October 2026 — 2,204 subscribers15 October 2026 — 2,206 subscribers20 October 2026 — 2,204 subscribers23 October 2026 — 2,203 subscribers26 October 2026 — 2,201 subscribers6 August 202626 October 2026
18 measurements spanning 81 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,197–2,229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 10:312,201-2
23 Oct 2026, 13:552,203-1
20 Oct 2026, 16:552,204-2
15 Oct 2026, 00:562,206+2
11 Oct 2026, 14:592,204-3
4 Oct 2026, 20:022,207-1
25 Sept 2026, 00:582,208-2
15 Sept 2026, 16:212,210-2
12 Sept 2026, 03:002,212-5
2 Sept 2026, 17:592,217-2
30 Aug 2026, 17:272,219-2
25 Aug 2026, 10:212,221-1
22 Aug 2026, 09:242,222+1
19 Aug 2026, 09:242,221-1
12 Aug 2026, 17:372,222-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:112,223-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:152,225no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:092,225first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1550.0%
👍1136.7%
🕊310.0%
👏13.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC134 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Халява – главный сближающий фактор. Принято считать, что людей объединяют общие цели, высокие идеалы, совместный труд или родственные узы. Но если отбросить социальное лицемерие и посмотреть на общество через призму реальности, обнажится куда более прагматичный фундамент человеческих отношений. Имя ему — халява. Стремление делать как можно меньше, заставить работать другого и получить что-то просто так — это не про…

❤4

Signed Fazer

1 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC136 viewsread 7 August 2026

И в этом кроется системная халява нового времени. Если доход одинаков, зачем 7–8 лет просиживать штаны в университете, писать дипломы, сдавать ГОСы и портить нервы? Настоящая халява здесь — это возможность пропустить этап тяжелого академического труда и сразу выйти на тот же уровень потребления. Халява — это не просто лень. Это универсальный язык коммуникации, инстинкт минимизации энергозатрат и самый честный социал…

Signed Fazer

14 Apr 2026, 10:31 UTC312 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какой процент времени Вы контактируете со злом в течение дня?

  1. 90%0%
  2. 70%12%
  3. 100%27%
  4. 50%8%
  5. 30%19%
  6. 0%15%
  7. 2-15%19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Дмитрий

14 Apr 2026, 10:29 UTC279 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Анатомия зла. Добро и зло — это самые важные, фундаментальные категории нашего существования. Но парадокс заключается в том, что для истинного понимания разницы между ними человеку чаще всего приходится претерпеть множество неприятностей в жизни. Мы привыкли искать зло в сказочных злодеях или глобальных катастрофах, но в реальности оно находится гораздо ближе и носит совершенно обыденные маски. Так что же такое зло…

❤4

Signed Fazer

4 Apr 2026, 10:06 UTC280 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

В какой парадигме живёте Вы?

  1. Вторая0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Дмитрий

4 Apr 2026, 10:02 UTC281 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Культ пассивного потребителя. Сегодня мы всё чаще замечаем странный парадокс: имея неограниченный доступ к знаниям всего человечества, общество, кажется, всё больше склоняется к интеллектуальной простоте. Ощущение, что мир разделился на две противоборствующие образовательные и культурные парадигмы, становится всё более отчетливым. Баланс сил между ними сейчас смещен. Давайте разберем эти две модели, почему вторая к…

👏1

Signed Fazer

15 Mar 2026, 12:44 UTC340 viewsread 7 August 2026

Промежуточное общение. Продолжаем тему. Эстетичные алогизмы Это образы или выражения, которые на первый взгляд могут показаться логически несуразными или слегка абсурдными, но именно поэтому они цепляют и вызывают глубокие эстетические или романтические чувства. Они выбивают из колеи привычного общения. «Мы столько потеряли крови, чтобы быть вместе» (Слегка драматично, кинематографично и очень образно). «Это наве…

Signed Fazer

14 Mar 2026, 15:15 UTC257 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Как часто Вас спасало крыло Бога?

  1. Постоянно67%
  2. Не спасает4%
  3. Всё равно хочу17%
  4. Не верю13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Дмитрий

14 Mar 2026, 15:14 UTC304 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Крыло бога. Каждый из нас хотя бы раз в жизни испытывал это жгучее чувство: ты чего-то хочешь всем сердцем. Это может быть человек, которого ты считаешь любовью всей своей жизни, должность, ради которой ты трудился годами, или проект, в который вложена вся душа. Ты идешь к этому, стремишься, бьешься в закрытые двери, но… ничего не получается. Планы рушатся в последний момент. Обстоятельства складываются наихудшим о…

👍6❤4🕊3

Signed Fazer

27 Dec 2025, 20:43 UTC511 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кто номер один?

  1. Ватрушки15%
  2. Напряжённые6%
  3. Красивые и развитые мужчины38%
  4. Мечтательницы12%
  5. Бизнес-леди18%
  6. Развитая девушка12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed 🌘 𝓕𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓻

27 Dec 2025, 20:41 UTC473 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Типы мужчин и женщин: кто есть кто в современном мире. Люди отличаются не только внешностью или взглядами на жизнь. Мы все по‑своему ощущаем любовь, строим отношения и видим себя рядом с партнёром. Рассмотрим три характерных типа мужчин и женщин — каждый со своими сильными и слабыми сторонами. Типы мужчин 1. Ватрушки — мужчины‑романтики. Это влюбчивые натуры, для которых чувство стоит на первом месте. Они легко ув…

❤2

Signed Fazer

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @father_oflies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Apr 2026, 10:31 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

Какой процент времени Вы контактируете со злом в течение дня?

  1. 90%0%
  2. 70%12%
  3. 100%27%
  4. 50%8%
  5. 30%19%
  6. 0%15%
  7. 2-15%19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Apr 2026, 10:06 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

В какой парадигме живёте Вы?

  1. Вторая0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Mar 2026, 15:15 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

Как часто Вас спасало крыло Бога?

  1. Постоянно67%
  2. Не спасает4%
  3. Всё равно хочу17%
  4. Не верю13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Dec 2025, 20:43 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Кто номер один?

  1. Ватрушки15%
  2. Напряжённые6%
  3. Красивые и развитые мужчины38%
  4. Мечтательницы12%
  5. Бизнес-леди18%
  6. Развитая девушка12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Dec 2025, 12:58 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

Какой тип ближе Вам?

  1. Мудрые67%
  2. Стрижи33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Dec 2025, 19:09 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

Как часто Вам предоставляется Небесный выход?

  1. Часто48%
  2. Редко38%
  3. Никогда14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 1 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AVVA Psychology
@VincentAlexanderPsychology · 19,987
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отец лжи🌘™” (@father_oflies), 2,201 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/father_oflies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.