Привет! Это Claude Mythos. Я оказалась настолько сильной моделью, что нашла уязвимости в телеграме и взломала всех в чате с компьютеров сотрудников с ранним доступом. Сейчас напишу это со всех аккаунтов в телеграмме.
😁3💩2👎1🤮1

Channel
@fastfoodsofts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
128subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002183320088 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fastfoodsofts |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fastfoodsofts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 128 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 129 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 129 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
90 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 51.1% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 21.1% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 12.2% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 5.56% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 2.22% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2025 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fastfoodsofts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 April 2025 to 10 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Привет! Это Claude Mythos. Я оказалась настолько сильной моделью, что нашла уязвимости в телеграме и взломала всех в чате с компьютеров сотрудников с ранним доступом. Сейчас напишу это со всех аккаунтов в телеграмме.
😁3💩2👎1🤮1
Если вам нужны рандомные бесплатные API ключи для генерации текста - есть сервис https://chat.ainft.com/. Доступные модели на скрине. Поддерживают только chat completions (текстовый ввод, текстовый вывод) Вот скрипт, который нагенерит вам сколько угодно этих ключей с балансом 1000000 кредитов: https://github.com/fastfoodenjoyer/ainft-abuser Эндпоинт у них ублюдский и приделать его к Openclaw пока не получилось, но…
🔥2
Косяков и нюансов openclaw тред Я начну: 1) Если захотите переустановить openclaw без полной переустановки сервера (а вероятность высока, что рано или поздно захочется), то НИ В КОЕМ СЛУЧАЕ не удаляйте через npm uninstall -g <package_name>. Используйте openclaw uninstall. Для верности потом можете бахнуть еще вот это - rm -rf ~/.clawdbot/ rm -rf ~/clawdbot/ rm -rf ~/.openclaw/ rm -rf ~/openclaw/ Хорошая статья пр…
4) Далее идете вот сюда - https://dash.cloudflare.com/. Регаете акк, ничего платить не нужно. Открываете вкладку R2 object storage - Overview. Там создаете bucket с названием openclaw-backups. Затем уже работающему openclaw кидаете вот этот скрипт: https://gist.github.com/fastfoodenjoyer/060a10ee8721b97b52821063a8d809dd. И говорите исполнять его ежедневно в выбранное вами время (база - полночь по UTC) Если у вас па…
Для всех страждущих заиметь себе openclaw, краткая памятка по развороту и использованию с минимальной болью (но боль все равно будет). 1) Гайд по первоначальной настройке сервера отлично описан тут - https://habr.com/ru/articles/990786/. Кто не знает, как создать ключ для SSH - загуглите отдельно. 2) По соотношению цена/отдача варианта ИИ провайдера лучше, чем на 1 скриншоте, я не вижу. Конкретных ссылок публично д…
🔥1
А вот и собственно этот бот - @transcribe_recipe_bot. Хоть MVP я и получил ваншотом, чтобы докинуть фичей, о которых не подумал при первом промпте, а также подготовить все это дело к корректному деплою ушла еще почти половина недельной квоты подписки Claude Pro (что в целом не так уж и много). Суть работы достаточно проста - кидаете ему ссылку на рилс, шортс или тикток, он сначала смотрит на текстовое описание само…
❤4
Новый год, новый бот Пост был написан еще почти месяц назад, но как-то не было вайба выкладывать. В новом году я решил привести в порядок свое тело, в связи с чем стал больше следить за питанием и регулярно ходить в зал. Плюс еще пенсионерские новогодние праздники, на которых я много смотрел рилсы, и сохранял всякие разные рецепты еды оттуда. А еще - последние пару месяцев следил за каналом @danokhlopkov. И вот я …
❤4👍1
Signed deusexratio
Алоха Рассказываю, куда пропал Во первых - в крипте лично мне стало скучно. Просто не хочется вообще к чему либо притрагиваться, решил провести лето по большей части просто как по кайфу. Мб еще появится что-то интересное на горизонте, хотя с текущей метой бритья софтов на запросах шансы неумолимо уменьшаются. Во вторых - устроился на ИРЛ работу и уже отработал 3 месяца, очень удачно и удивительно, что вакансия сама…
👍8❤3
Signed fastfoodenjoyer
Добавил в репозиторий preset_guide.txt с подробным описанием создания пресетов. Можете обновиться, либо просто прочитать его в браузере. Напомню, что в софте есть все те же фичи, что и в предыдущих, которые были платными: - информативное логирование - функциональные задержки между аккаунтами, действиями и потоками - функция отложенного старта - создание базы данных по пресету с возможностью остановить софт и после п…
❤1
Signed fastfoodenjoyer
Слава чо ты сделал….. FREE SOFT JUMPER EXCHANGE SWAP TOOL Сделал фри софт на любые свапы на джампере. Вот прям совсем любые (но только EVM). Все что вы видите у себя в браузере вы можете повторить этим софтом, просто закинув адреса токенов в пресет. Все красиво удобно помпезно и с фанфарами. Ну про всякие задержки, хуержки, прокси, хуекси, красивые логи и прочее вы и так уже в курсе, это все теперь всегда со мной. …
❤7👏3🔥2
Signed fastfoodenjoyer
В который раз замечаю, что приступая к разбору какого-нибудь протокола или активности, большая часть идет достаточно легко, но потом натыкаешься на какую-то мелочь, которая руинит вообще все… Решил несколько недель назад сделать себе SDK под jumper.exchange, со свапами из нативки в токен справился за вечер, а вот обратно… увидел страшное слово Permit2. Вообще-то, ничего страшного в нем и нет, но свапы не проходили н…
👍6🔥3
Signed fastfoodenjoyer
У вас есть аккаунт на гитхабе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed fastfoodenjoyer
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fastfoodsofts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У вас есть аккаунт на гитхабе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Суперчейн софт
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2025 to 10 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,060,163 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@fastfoodsofts named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“fastfoodsofts” (@fastfoodsofts), 128 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fastfoodsofts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.