Выложил финиш самой интересной гонки этой Европы – финал 3км на выбывание – в соц сети. 🌐Инст 🌐Тикток

Channel
Быстрее пули | Саня Давыдов 🔫
@faster_bullet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,817subscribers
+377 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001378990018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @faster_bullet |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/faster_bullet |
Topic
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 4,817 | -12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 4,829 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 4,838 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 4,832 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:52 | 4,833 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 4,837 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 4,836 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 4,840 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 4,848 | +59 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 4,789 | +162 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 4,627 | +118 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 4,509 | +63 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 4,446 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 4,440 | first reading |
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 62 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 01s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,241 reactions across 40 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 492 | 39.6% | |
| 🔥 | 142 | 11.4% | |
| 🤣 | 133 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 58 | 4.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 51 | 4.11% | |
| 😁 | 48 | 3.87% | |
| 😭 | 48 | 3.87% | |
| 🏆 | 46 | 3.71% | |
| 😍 | 46 | 3.71% | |
| 🤔 | 20 | 1.61% | |
| 🤡 | 19 | 1.53% | |
| 🙏 | 18 | 1.45% | |
| 💋 | 16 | 1.29% | |
| 🍓 | 15 | 1.21% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 1.21% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 1.05% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 0.725% | |
| 😎 | 8 | 0.645% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 0.564% | |
| 🆒 | 5 | 0.403% | |
| 11 further kinds | 32 | 2.58% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 62 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @faster_bullet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Найдите шутку на фото Подсказка: Смотрите левее
😁17🤡4❤3🤣2
Для наших медалей, конечно, это хорошие новости. Хоть и стать чемпионом Европы приятнее с Маршаном, чем без. Но никто не помнит состав участников, все помнят медали! https://t.me/water_match/5652
🕊7❤5💯1
Итоги Европы на открытой воде от тренера сборной России, личного тренера Саши Степанова и мамы Кирилла Беляева – Анны Анатольевны Тулуповой ❤️ Мы вернемся сильнее! Вместе! https://t.me/rybinskswim/535
❤8
Запоминайте эти лица слева направо: Яна Курцева, Александр Степанов, Денис Адеев, Екатерина Сорокина, Владимир Иванов, Александра Хайлова, Владимир Муратов, Анастасия Саратова 🇷🇺 И Полина Козякина – именинница сегодняшнего дня не попала на фото. Уверенное настоящее, и еще более яркое и медальное будущее российской открытой воды! Под руководством шикарного Кирилла Беляева ❤️ https://t.me/rybinskswim/534
❤20👏6😍4
Не Беттина Фабиан, конечно, но тоже неплохо. Самый титулованный марафонец в истории – Флориан Веллброк 🇩🇪
😍23😁9❤8👍3🔥1
А вот так местные стражи правопорядка перекрывали дорогу участникам движения, чтобы зрители могли перебегать с одного края моста на другой и болеть за спортсменов 👍👍👍
👍19👌3
А Дима Дятлов пока рассказывает Беттине, что драться нехорошо, а в Новомосковске лучше, чем в Будапеште. Она еще ломается…
❤22😁5🆒5
Вот оно – то, ради чего мы ждали Александра Степанова на чемпионате Европы – местное интервью 💔
🏆41❤🔥14❤12🤡5🤮2🙏1
🌊 Пятое место у нашей команды! Екатерина Сорокина, Анастасия Саратова, Владимир Иванов и Владимир Муратов финишировали пятыми в смешанной эстафете 4×1500 м на открытой воде в Париже. Золото забрала Германия 🇩🇪, серебро у Италии 🇮🇹, бронза у Венгрии 🇭🇺
🔥24🐳3😍3🤨1
Саша Степанов снова выдал люто местное интервью. Разбирайте
🍓14🏆5❤2
Настя Саратова очень красивая 😭💔 И как теперь выбрать?!
🤔20🤡10❤8😁5💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @faster_bullet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@faster_bullet edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@aquacex · 7765 postsSwim Talk
@swimtalk · 2,8553 postsPRO ПЛАВАНИЕ для родителей юных спортсменов
@PROSWIMPARENTS · 1,3642 postsЕкатерина Чухрова
@kchuhrovak · 1342 postsK/On/Off
@KOnOfff · 17,7441 postРеальный Губер 🤘🏻
@RealGuberniev · 80,0901 postSCA – Ассоциация тренеров по плаванию
@sca_sswimming · 4901 postНОВОСТИ плавания | Путь пловцов
@swimnews_world · 4111 postПро Плавание | Дубовской Артем
@swimsmart · 7331 postВасильчук печатает
@vasilchukmedia · 5671 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@rus_aquatics · 28,7903 postsВодный Матч!
@water_match · 22,7073 postsМахал Канал // Махалин Данила
@MahalKanal · 1,5191 postО жизни - Даниил Серебренников
@SilverTalks · 2621 postFilLA🏊♀️🏊🏊♂️ плавание
@lilyafilya · 7161 postМатч ТВ
@match_tv · 670,9531 postSportFack
@sportfucky · 17,8501 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@match_academy · 18,75914 postsK/On/Off
@KOnOfff · 17,7447 postsПуть пловцов | Манкевич А.В.
@mankevich_swim · 11,0973 postsSwim Talk
@swimtalk · 2,8553 postsМатч ТВ
@match_tv · 670,9532 postsАКВА ЦЕХ | Москва
@aquacex · 7761 postПеретрём
@pere_Trem · 3,2031 post💧ПлавБаза 🧠
@PlavBaza17 · 1,0531 postPRO ПЛАВАНИЕ для родителей юных спортсменов
@PROSWIMPARENTS · 1,3641 postРеальный Губер 🤘🏻
@RealGuberniev · 80,0901 postSCA – Ассоциация тренеров по плаванию
@sca_sswimming · 4901 postВасильчук печатает
@vasilchukmedia · 5671 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rus_aquatics · 28,790
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 9 September 2026
@matyushovivan · 21,031
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
@water_match · 22,707
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Быстрее пули | Саня Давыдов 🔫” (@faster_bullet), 4,817 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/faster_bullet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.