Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фешн хурма

Channel

Фешн хурма

@fashionhurma

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,266subscribers

+2,215 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001351722525
TypeChannel
Username@fashionhurma
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fashionhurma

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,0517,2666,158.57 August 2026 — 5,051 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,051 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,060 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,289 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,344 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,416 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,485 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,917 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,105 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,363 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,639 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,800 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,053 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,182 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,266 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +2,215. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,719–7,598 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 18:007,266+84
15 Sept 2026, 06:587,182+129
11 Sept 2026, 05:357,053+253
6 Sept 2026, 16:556,800+161
2 Sept 2026, 13:256,639+276
30 Aug 2026, 21:456,363+258
27 Aug 2026, 16:126,105+188
24 Aug 2026, 22:175,917+432
21 Aug 2026, 05:365,485+69
18 Aug 2026, 15:075,416+72
15 Aug 2026, 04:455,344+55
12 Aug 2026, 00:175,289+229
8 Aug 2026, 14:585,060+9
7 Aug 2026, 18:465,051no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:385,051first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 11s
Average length
1m 36s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,160 reactions across 10 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
66357.2%
🔥26522.8%
💯453.88%
custom 5224572019001021082413.53%
🎉413.53%
custom 5224176774635605722342.93%
👍312.67%
😴80.69%
👏70.603%
💘60.517%
🥰60.517%
custom 522452190532260977650.431%
❤‍🔥30.259%
😍30.259%
🙈10.086%
🤔10.086%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 10 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fashionhurma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,290 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

49🔥18custom 522457201900102108213👍3🙈1

8 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈1,710 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Если вы до сих пор считаете, что чёрный цвет сумки — самый универсальный, то смею вас переубедить! Но сначала скажите: а кто-нибудь помнит это легендарное платье? Один из моих самых грандиозных проектов, который был опубликован в блоге. Достала его из закромов и решила выгулять со своей новой сумкой Povod. Благородные глубокие цвета — всегда шикарный акцент, который подходит почти ко всем элементам гардероба. Тако

64🔥23💯7❤‍🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC≈2,300 views181 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Интересно, а теперь при знакомстве можно называть себя блогером?

78🎉41💯38🔥17👏7

5 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈2,730 views161 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

🚩Вы просили — мы сделали!🚩 В Раппорте появился фильтр по толщине и плотности! Ух, ну и замучились мы с этими показателями. Начнём с толщины, она же метраж пряжи Сначала нужно было понять, как это лучше всего визуализировать: пошли изучать, как это сделано в магазинах пряжи, — они указывают диапазоны толщины. Потом аналитика показала, что в проанализированных описаниях существуют популярные метражи, и в соответствии

88🔥55custom 522457201900102108217🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈2,800 views135 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мои эксперименты с зеленым продолжаются. В этот раз они вылились в ТРИКОТАЖНОЕ ФИСТАШКОВОЕ ПЛАТЬЕ Думаю, вы заметили, что я вообще любительница платьев и юбок, а особенно в теплое время года. А вот трикотажного платья в моей коллекции нет, очень хотелось это исправить. О ткани Когда речь идет о трикотаже, я всегда иду к @redmeter. Я уже много раз говорила, что лучше их трикотажа я еще не встречала. Для меня главный

85👍25🔥13custom 52241767746356057229😍3

2 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC≈2,280 views98 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Итоги июля! Вспоминаю, чем был наполнен мой июль. Посты: · Обсудили с вами тренд на иллюзорное вязание · Познакомились с новой героиней рубрики «Самая». · Подвели итоги работы «Раппорт», посмотрели, какие описания стали самыми популярными. · Вышло два больших поста про тренды: теория и практика. Видео: · Вышел видеообзор описаний Из рукодельного: Связала: · Влюбилась в ажуры благодаря #блуза_зефир · Связала ид

🔥6329🥰6

31 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC≈3,030 views117 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

85🔥19custom 522457201900102108211😴2

30 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTC≈2,250 views118 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

83🔥29💘6

29 Jul 2026, 06:54 UTC≈2,060 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

С какой темы начнем?

  1. Идеальные пуговицы для любых изделий26%
  2. Новые тренды в вязании54%
  3. Комфорт как одна из опорных точек ДНК персонального стиля22%
  4. Редизайн обложек книг8%
  5. Топ-3 моих любимых невязальных каналов на YouTube25%
  6. Пограничные хобби19%
  7. Процессы и идеи34%

The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥1712custom 52241767746356057222

27 Jul 2026, 08:51 UTC≈3,700 views138 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Помните, я писала, что мы с вами не закончили с #фемина_топ! Попросила мужа пофоткать меня на выходных, ибо фото в нём много не бывает. Это абсолютно на 100% мой топ. Безумно рада, что он у меня есть! Как я уже писала, он достаточно лёгкий в исполнении, если вас, конечно, не пугает мелкий диаметр спиц. Но в моём случае сложность изделию задавала нитка. Я использовала хлопок с большим количеством эластана, и нить пр

90custom 522417677463560572223🔥11😴6custom 52245219053226097765👍3

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @fashionhurma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 06:54 UTCFinal Results380 voters

С какой темы начнем?

  1. Идеальные пуговицы для любых изделий26%
  2. Новые тренды в вязании54%
  3. Комфорт как одна из опорных точек ДНК персонального стиля22%
  4. Редизайн обложек книг8%
  5. Топ-3 моих любимых невязальных каналов на YouTube25%
  6. Пограничные хобби19%
  7. Процессы и идеи34%

The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фешн хурма” (@fashionhurma), 7,266 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashionhurma.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.