Это рукодельный блог!
Вяжу, шью и стилизую свои творения.
А ещё веду YouTube и вдохновляю на рукоделие!
Агрегатор описаний Раппорт
@rapportapp_bot
Автор канала: Юля ЮЮ
Пестова Юлия Юрьевна
ИНН 410116038191
Для связи @pestova_uu
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 93 days, net +3,092. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,570–8,743 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 06:58
8,143
-15
5 Nov 2026, 08:09
8,158
-20
2 Nov 2026, 14:44
8,178
-34
30 Oct 2026, 06:39
8,212
-21
27 Oct 2026, 17:17
8,233
-28
24 Oct 2026, 09:27
8,261
+31
21 Oct 2026, 17:44
8,230
+16
18 Oct 2026, 20:26
8,214
+11
16 Oct 2026, 03:50
8,203
+28
13 Oct 2026, 06:11
8,175
+80
7 Oct 2026, 07:59
8,095
+163
30 Sept 2026, 10:57
7,932
+666
19 Sept 2026, 18:00
7,266
+84
15 Sept 2026, 06:58
7,182
+129
11 Sept 2026, 05:35
7,053
+253
6 Sept 2026, 16:55
6,800
+161
2 Sept 2026, 13:25
6,639
+276
30 Aug 2026, 21:45
6,363
+258
27 Aug 2026, 16:12
6,105
+188
24 Aug 2026, 22:17
5,917
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.7%
avg views ÷ 8,143 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,740
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
17 (27 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
16,450
Reactions total
629
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 00:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,930
Videos
≈145
Links
≈363
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 25s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,789 reactions across 16 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
921
51.5%
🔥
353
19.7%
custom 5224572019001021082
202
11.3%
😍
65
3.63%
💯
45
2.52%
🎉
41
2.29%
custom 5224176774635605722
34
1.90%
👍
34
1.90%
💘
14
0.783%
custom 5224494791194068818
13
0.727%
custom 5224521905322609776
13
0.727%
😁
13
0.727%
🥰
9
0.503%
😴
8
0.447%
🤔
8
0.447%
👏
7
0.391%
💔
4
0.224%
❤🔥
3
0.168%
😢
1
0.056%
🙈
1
0.056%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,789 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fashionhurma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Вчера выложила рилс про суперские аксессуары по бесплатным описаниям.
Решила и здесь с вами поделиться.
Ибо о них хочется рассказать везде, потому что это самый сок текущих трендов!
🟡Полосатая манишка #круговорот от @yarninmybrain
Почему надо вязать:
· полоска нынче очень в тренде;
· разнообразит любую вашу верхнюю одежду;
· весной можно носить просто как кейп.
🔴Мужская шапка #идеальная_мужскаяшапка от @knitsom…
Итоги октября.
Октябрь прошел под лозунгом — успеть всё или не успеть ничего)))
Из рукодельного:
Сшила:
· юбку, и кажется, она идеальная;
· пижамные штаны для дома;
· водолазку за пару часов (мой самый быстрый пошив).
· довязала свой топ из яка с хлопком с высоким воротом, но есть мысль перевязать ворот.
· вязала чепчик из пуха норки.
Что было в блоге:
· поделилась своими любимыми нерукодельными ютуб-каналами;
· вы…
Знаете это волшебное чувство, когда ты понимаешь, что вещь твоя на миллион процентов?
У меня так случилось с этой юбкой.
#готовыеработы_фешн_хурма
Причем я как будто даже и не планировала ее шить.
Года 2 назад купила 80 см костюмной шерсти в местном магазинчике дочке на шорты. Шорты я сшила, но из хлопковой костюмки, так как боялась испортить эту шерсть. Одними шортами я решила ограничиться, и ткань так и лежала. …
Одна голова хорошо, но идеи вязальщиц лучше!
Уже совсем скоро мы выпускаем большое обновление Раппорта с двумя новыми блоками:
🧶 Хранилище пряжи — учёт запасов, оттенков и партий, контроль остатков, сохранение образцов и подбор подходящих описаний под ваши материалы.
📒 Проекты — личный вязальный дневник с историей каждой вещи: описание, пряжа, инструменты, образцы, заметки, фотографии и статус работы.
Самое классное…
От гениальности до сумасшествия...
Наткнулась тут в соцсетях на очень интересный аксессуар от бренда Rogov (Александра Рогова).
Это некий трикотажный пояс/корсет. По факту — прямоугольник на пуговицах.
С одной стороны, выглядит очень интересно: аксессуар, который смотрится свежо и имеет огромный потенциал в стилизации. Можно носить на талии, можно поднять на грудь, как топ или спустить на бёдра на манер юбки. А мо…
Приятно возвращаться домой и окунаться в свою привычную рутину.
А дома меня ещё ждали мои новые домашние штаны, которые я успела сшить до отпуска❣️
Шила по своей любимой выкройке (к сожалению ссылка слетела ((
Мне нравится её объём, идеально для моей фигуры.
А вот ткань у меня тут необычная, рубашечная. «А почему бы и нет»,подумала я и сшила не рубашку, да так можно)
Хотя ей позывы сшить и верх в комплект.
Как бы…
Если вы до сих пор считаете, что чёрный цвет сумки — самый универсальный, то смею вас переубедить!
Но сначала скажите: а кто-нибудь помнит это легендарное платье?
Один из моих самых грандиозных проектов, который был опубликован в блоге.
Достала его из закромов и решила выгулять со своей новой сумкой Povod.
Благородные глубокие цвета — всегда шикарный акцент, который подходит почти ко всем элементам гардероба. Тако…
🚩Вы просили — мы сделали!🚩
В Раппорте появился фильтр по толщине и плотности!
Ух, ну и замучились мы с этими показателями.
Начнём с толщины, она же метраж пряжи
Сначала нужно было понять, как это лучше всего визуализировать: пошли изучать, как это сделано в магазинах пряжи, — они указывают диапазоны толщины.
Потом аналитика показала, что в проанализированных описаниях существуют популярные метражи, и в соответствии…
Мои эксперименты с зеленым продолжаются.
В этот раз они вылились в ТРИКОТАЖНОЕ ФИСТАШКОВОЕ ПЛАТЬЕ
Думаю, вы заметили, что я вообще любительница платьев и юбок, а особенно в теплое время года. А вот трикотажного платья в моей коллекции нет, очень хотелось это исправить.
О ткани
Когда речь идет о трикотаже, я всегда иду к @redmeter. Я уже много раз говорила, что лучше их трикотажа я еще не встречала. Для меня главный…
Итоги июля!
Вспоминаю, чем был наполнен мой июль.
Посты:
· Обсудили с вами тренд на иллюзорное вязание
· Познакомились с новой героиней рубрики «Самая».
· Подвели итоги работы «Раппорт», посмотрели, какие описания стали самыми популярными.
· Вышло два больших поста про тренды: теория и практика.
Видео:
· Вышел видеообзор описаний
Из рукодельного:
Связала:
· Влюбилась в ажуры благодаря #блуза_зефир
· Связала ид…
🔥63❤29🥰6
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @fashionhurma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Комфорт как одна из опорных точек ДНК персонального стиля22%
Редизайн обложек книг8%
Топ-3 моих любимых невязальных каналов на YouTube25%
Пограничные хобби19%
Процессы и идеи34%
The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фешн хурма” (@fashionhurma), 8,143 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashionhurma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.