Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FASHION FABRIQUE

Channel

FASHION FABRIQUE

@fashionfabrique

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

93,863subscribers

-1,602 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001052298565
TypeChannel
Username@fashionfabrique
DescriptionСайт: https://clck.ru/3T7qfq Приложение: https://clck.ru/3T7rNr Оформить заказ: @fashionfabriquebot | @fashionfabriquecatalogbot МСК, 10-22 📍2-я Тверская-Ямская 47 СПБ, 10-21 📍Литейный пр. 15 8 (800) 222-27-70
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fashionfabrique

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

93,86395,46594,6647 August 2026 — 95,465 subscribers7 August 2026 — 95,465 subscribers7 August 2026 — 95,456 subscribers8 August 2026 — 95,428 subscribers9 August 2026 — 95,384 subscribers10 August 2026 — 95,349 subscribers11 August 2026 — 95,319 subscribers12 August 2026 — 95,298 subscribers14 August 2026 — 95,260 subscribers15 August 2026 — 95,226 subscribers16 August 2026 — 95,173 subscribers18 August 2026 — 95,121 subscribers19 August 2026 — 95,082 subscribers20 August 2026 — 95,038 subscribers21 August 2026 — 94,966 subscribers22 August 2026 — 94,939 subscribers24 August 2026 — 94,871 subscribers25 August 2026 — 94,821 subscribers26 August 2026 — 94,785 subscribers27 August 2026 — 94,762 subscribers28 August 2026 — 94,710 subscribers29 August 2026 — 94,708 subscribers30 August 2026 — 94,679 subscribers31 August 2026 — 94,640 subscribers1 September 2026 — 94,597 subscribers2 September 2026 — 94,560 subscribers3 September 2026 — 94,508 subscribers5 September 2026 — 94,450 subscribers8 September 2026 — 94,338 subscribers11 September 2026 — 94,199 subscribers13 September 2026 — 94,098 subscribers14 September 2026 — 94,025 subscribers16 September 2026 — 93,982 subscribers18 September 2026 — 93,863 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,602. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 93,623–95,705 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:5893,863-119
16 Sept 2026, 16:3693,982-43
14 Sept 2026, 19:1994,025-73
13 Sept 2026, 03:3694,098-101
11 Sept 2026, 01:4194,199-139
8 Sept 2026, 00:0094,338-112
5 Sept 2026, 00:5794,450-58
3 Sept 2026, 08:4594,508-52
2 Sept 2026, 02:2494,560-37
1 Sept 2026, 05:3794,597-43
31 Aug 2026, 08:1894,640-39
30 Aug 2026, 04:4894,679-29
29 Aug 2026, 06:5494,708-2
28 Aug 2026, 09:2294,710-52
27 Aug 2026, 11:0894,762-23
26 Aug 2026, 14:2494,785-36
25 Aug 2026, 11:4294,821-50
24 Aug 2026, 09:4894,871-68
22 Aug 2026, 14:3594,939-27
21 Aug 2026, 03:2494,966first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.12%
avg views ÷ 93,863 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,740
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.657%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held63 (7 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total229,770
Reactions total1,483
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈40,800
Videos
≈1,690
Links
≈3,750

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 15s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,565 reactions across 61 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,35452.8%
❤‍🔥62724.4%
😍45317.7%
💔1054.09%
🤩240.936%
💘20.078%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 09:16 UTC≈3,650 views42 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Вишневый костюм свободного силуэта — для образов с настроением непринужденной роскоши. Однобортный пиджак / арт. 246646 Трикотажный джемпер / арт. 2376735 Брюки / арт. 246645 >> Задать вопрос менеджеру >> Оформить заказ на сайте >> МСК: 2-я Тверская-Ямская 47 >> СПБ: Литейный 15

❤21❤‍🔥14😍7

23 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC≈4,910 views45 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

В сезон театральных премьер выбираем бархатный жакет и юбку с вышивкой, которая оживает в движении россыпью света. >> Задать вопрос менеджеру >> Оформить заказ на сайте >> МСК: 2-я Тверская-Ямская 47 >> СПБ: Литейный 15

❤24❤‍🔥14😍7

22 Sept 2026, 09:12 UTC≈5,400 views50 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥27😍13❤10

21 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC≈5,710 views24 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Завтра подводим итоги конкурса В 15:00 определим победителей и разыграем два сертификата номиналом 10 000 ₽ — от FASHION FABRIQUE и SOLIDAY KIDS. Чтобы принять участие, переходите в наш канал в МАКС и знакомьтесь со всеми условиями конкурса.

😍11❤7❤‍🔥3💔3

21 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC≈5,760 views39 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Куда сходить в Петербурге: выставка художницы Леры Смирновой Вязаные полотна с фразами из интернет-сленга, кружевные орнаменты и фотографии рассказывают о том, как традиционное рукоделие встречается с современной культурой.

❤24❤‍🔥11😍4

20 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC≈5,860 views58 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❤34❤‍🔥14😍9💔1

19 Sept 2026, 08:34 UTC≈5,840 views49 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Серо-голубой сочетаем с глубоким бордовым, вдохновляясь оттенками спелого инжира и прохладным сентябрьским утром. >> Задать вопрос менеджеру >> Оформить заказ на сайте >> МСК: 2-я Тверская-Ямская 47 >> СПБ: Литейный 15

❤36😍7❤‍🔥6

18 Sept 2026, 08:34 UTC≈5,940 views61 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Осень зовет за город — дышать прохладным воздухом, слушать шорох листьев под ногами и согреваться чаем после прогулки.

❤37❤‍🔥17😍7

17 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC≈5,220 views2 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Poll

Насколько для вас важна возможность оплаты частями при онлайн-покупке?

  1. Очень важна21%
  2. Удобно, но не обязательно30%
  3. Не пользуюсь оплатой частями52%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤2

17 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC≈4,710 views2 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Poll

Если вы предпочитаете сайт, почему он для вас удобнее?

  1. Проще сравнивать товары в разных вкладках29%
  2. Не нужно устанавливать приложение58%
  3. Удобнее смотреть каталог на большом экране40%
  4. Были проблемы и сбои в приложении12%
  5. Другое (напишите, пожалуйста, в комментариях)2%

The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤2

17 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC≈4,070 viewsread 20 September 2026
Poll

Как часто вы устанавливаете новые приложения?

  1. Почти никогда (экономлю память телефона / не люблю лишние приложения)26%
  2. Редко (только если очень нужно)69%
  3. Часто (люблю новые сервисы)8%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC≈4,230 views0 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Poll

Если вы пользуетесь приложением, почему оно для вас удобнее?

  1. Быстрее открыть и найти нужное39%
  2. Удобнее смотреть каталог54%
  3. Проще пользоваться избранным34%
  4. Удобнее оформлять заказ21%
  5. Удобно получать уведомления о скидках и новинках13%
  6. Другое (напишите, пожалуйста, в комментариях)4%

The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @fashionfabrique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Poll328 voters

Насколько для вас важна возможность оплаты частями при онлайн-покупке?

  1. Очень важна21%
  2. Удобно, но не обязательно30%
  3. Не пользуюсь оплатой частями52%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Poll142 voters

Если вы предпочитаете сайт, почему он для вас удобнее?

  1. Проще сравнивать товары в разных вкладках29%
  2. Не нужно устанавливать приложение58%
  3. Удобнее смотреть каталог на большом экране40%
  4. Были проблемы и сбои в приложении12%
  5. Другое (напишите, пожалуйста, в комментариях)2%

The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Poll255 voters

Как часто вы устанавливаете новые приложения?

  1. Почти никогда (экономлю память телефона / не люблю лишние приложения)26%
  2. Редко (только если очень нужно)69%
  3. Часто (люблю новые сервисы)8%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Poll112 voters

Если вы пользуетесь приложением, почему оно для вас удобнее?

  1. Быстрее открыть и найти нужное39%
  2. Удобнее смотреть каталог54%
  3. Проще пользоваться избранным34%
  4. Удобнее оформлять заказ21%
  5. Удобно получать уведомления о скидках и новинках13%
  6. Другое (напишите, пожалуйста, в комментариях)4%

The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Poll260 voters

Где вам удобнее совершать покупки FASHION FABRIQUE?

  1. На сайте16%
  2. В приложении15%
  3. На сайте и в приложении одинаково20%
  4. В офлайн-магазинах60%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTCAnonymous Poll263 voters

Выбираем фаворита 🤍

  1. Шоколадный тренч, сливочный трикотаж и мини-юбка23%
  2. Шерстяной пиджак с подчеркнутой талией32%
  3. Рубашка с шарфом и графичная юбка макси17%
  4. Розовый свитер с объемными рукавами и мини-юбка26%
  5. Поло из тонкого трикотажа, юбка макси и фактурные кожаные туфли19%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FASHION FABRIQUE” (@fashionfabrique), 93,863 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashionfabrique.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.