Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FASE 2 JUICIOS ADN DE ESPAÑA

Channel

FASE 2 JUICIOS ADN DE ESPAÑA

@fase2juicios

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,229subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002179452443
TypeChannel
Username@fase2juicios
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fase2juicios

Growth

1,2271,2331,2307 August 2026 — 1,233 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,233 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,231 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,229 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,227 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,228 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,230 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,229 subscribers1,2297 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,226–1,234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 11:041,229-1
24 Aug 2026, 02:251,230+2
19 Aug 2026, 23:441,228+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:161,227-2
13 Aug 2026, 01:431,229-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:551,231-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:031,233no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:571,233first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 5 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6459.8%
💯1211.2%
🙏1211.2%
👍76.54%
🔥54.67%
💅32.80%
🥰21.87%
👏10.935%
🤪10.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 13 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Nov 2025, 16:09 UTC≈6,880 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Sabes por qué SÍ ES POSIBLE? TRAER COMO IMPUTADOS AL CREADOR DEL BREBAJE? PORQUE HEMOS RECORRIDO TODO EL CAMINO, A FALTA DE UN PASO, PARA PODER HACERLO POSIBLE… SI… traer como imputados a los creadores del suero, transgénico de ARN mensajero, mal etiquetado en su día, y Criminal en España, por cierto. PÁSALO PARA REMATAR LA FAENA COLABORA (si tu alma lo siente…) 1/ PAYPAL: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/usquant

🙏12👍4💅1🤪1

13 Nov 2025, 12:51 UTC≈1,900 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

7👍3🥰2

13 Nov 2025, 12:44 UTC≈3,850 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

NOTICIAS FASE 2.- JUEVES 13 NOVIEMBRE. Estamos en la brecha. UN PAR DE PROMOS PARA VER SI LLEGAMOS AL BOTE. PARA REMODELAR Y PEDIR DE NUEVO TODO, INCLUYENDO AL CREADOR DEL BREBAJE. Va por unos 2.600 (lo publicaré! Semanas intensas de trabajo. Gracias por la confianza!) https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQ_ysLnCJP6/?igsh=c29pZWVuczZqeDJh

7

7 Nov 2025, 13:47 UTC≈3,490 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

A la vista del informe del FISCAL (acontecimiento 73) y mi recurso de reforma, CREES QUE SU CONDUCTA TENDRÍA ENCAJE o cumple en el delito ART. 408 CÓDIGO PENAL-omisión del deber de perseguir delitos?

  1. No, porque da argumentos aunque sean inconstitucionales1%
  2. Sí, debe investigar porque no existen precedentes del uso de ARNm en humanos españoles10%
  3. Sí, porque la INGENIERÍA GENÉTICA (ARNm) es delito y ÉL NO es el Abogado de PFIZER ni MODERNA.51%
  4. Sí, porque sus argumentos son ilógicos, y un pretexto aparente para evitar investigar, CLARAMENTE!44%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15💯2💅1

6 Nov 2025, 11:17 UTC≈4,110 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

11🔥4👏1💯1

6 Nov 2025, 11:03 UTC≈4,580 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

En el siguiente audio, os hago una reflexión importante… PODRÍA SER DELICTIVO EL ACONTECIMIENTO 73? …estoy pensando que dentro del plazo que tengo de 5 días para solicitar lo que se debe remitir a la Sala penal de la Audiencia nacional para la resolución de apelación, que estudien la posibilidad de que se pudiera estar cometiendo un delito del artículo 408 Código Penal, de omisión del deber de perseguir delitos. …

13💅1💯1🔥1

6 Nov 2025, 10:51 UTC≈2,540 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

NOTICIAS FASE 2.- MIRA EL ACONTECIMIENTO 73. INFORME DEL FISCAL ACONSEJANDO NO INVESTIGAR A LAS QUERELLADAS PFIZER Y MODERNA, y exculpar de antemano a los directores generales de las empresas, a pesar de que son los que han incumplido la ley española en España.. VAMOS A PENSAR, y PREGÚNTATE: si fueras Juez, verías esto como delito? Del art. 408 CP? Cada uno puede pensar lo que quiera, como ejercicio intelectual. HAB

💯72

5 Nov 2025, 18:07 UTC≈1,170 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ESTRENO HOY A LAS 19:10 HORAS. Si comienzas y está empezado, puedes dar a ver desde el principio: https://youtu.be/buI8oQR8_p8 UN MENSAJE DE ESPERANZA: :El pasado 18 Octubre intervine en un Congreso hablando del TEMA (Long Cvd-Suero ARNm), como abogado, y la pregunta era: QUÉ HEMOS CONSEGUIDO EN LA LUCHA con las famosas CORPORACIONES Farmacéuticas Vs la población? Pues bien, diseñé UN MENSAJE DE ESPERANZA, y que re

9💯1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @fase2juicios. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2025, 13:47 UTCAnonymous Poll99 voters

A la vista del informe del FISCAL (acontecimiento 73) y mi recurso de reforma, CREES QUE SU CONDUCTA TENDRÍA ENCAJE o cumple en el delito ART. 408 CÓDIGO PENAL-omisión del deber de perseguir delitos?

  1. No, porque da argumentos aunque sean inconstitucionales1%
  2. Sí, debe investigar porque no existen precedentes del uso de ARNm en humanos españoles10%
  3. Sí, porque la INGENIERÍA GENÉTICA (ARNm) es delito y ÉL NO es el Abogado de PFIZER ni MODERNA.51%
  4. Sí, porque sus argumentos son ilógicos, y un pretexto aparente para evitar investigar, CLARAMENTE!44%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 13 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FASE 2 JUICIOS ADN DE ESPAÑA” (@fase2juicios), 1,229 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fase2juicios.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.