Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 26 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 39.8%
- avg views ÷ 1,239 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 493
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.97%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,280
- Videos
- ≈216
- Links
- ≈1,480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 15s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
274 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 274 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
29 Sept 2026, 16:49 UTC286 views8 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Photo
Entoni Russo ta’kidlashicha, Loki va Stiv ishtirokidagi sahna "Qasoskorlar: Intiho" filmining mukammal yakunidan keyin qo‘yilgan bor-yo‘g‘i bitta qadam butun hikoyani qanday o‘zgartirib yuborishi mumkinligini ko‘rsatib beradi.
Bu esa "Qasoskorlar: Qiyomat kuni" filmi uchun mutlaqo yangi yo‘nalishga asos soladi.
↪️https://t.me/farzidguychannell
❤6🔥1🤮1
Signed FarZidGuy
29 Sept 2026, 16:46 UTC297 views10 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Photo
Kate Bishopning «QASOSKORLAR: QIYOMAT KUNI» filmida qaytishi deyarli tasdiqlandi.
ScreenX treylerida Skott Lengning qizi Kessi bilan uning xonadonida uchrashayotgani ko‘rsatilgan.
↪️https://t.me/farzidguychannell
❤8💩1🔥1
Signed FarZidGuy
29 Sept 2026, 16:43 UTC300 views11 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Photo
Xabarlarga ko‘ra, «Qasoskorlar: Qiyomat kuni» filmining dastlabki namoyishlari bo‘lib o‘tdi.
Dastlabki taassurotlar «juda yaxshi» bo‘lgani aytilmoqda.
↪️https://t.me/farzidguychannell
❤9🔥1🤮1
Signed FarZidGuy
27 Sept 2026, 18:12 UTC511 views36 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Video
Bazi narsalar hayron qoldiradi.
Ha bu o'sha 7 yil oldin Toni Starkning qizini o'ynagan qiz
↪️https://t.me/farzidguychannell
🤮22😱10💩3😁1
Signed FarZidGuy
27 Sept 2026, 16:26 UTC516 views30 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Photo
Altronning sevgilisi Jokastaning ilk ko'rishinishi
↪️https://t.me/farzidguychannell
😁15👍9❤2💩2🤮1😱1
Signed FarZidGuy
27 Sept 2026, 16:18 UTC505 views16 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Photo
Gvinet Peltrou bugun 54 yoshga kirdi
↪️https://t.me/farzidguychannell
❤12👍2💩1🤮1
Signed FarZidGuy
27 Sept 2026, 16:15 UTC498 views21 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Photo
Jenna Ortega bugun 24 yoshga kirdi
↪️https://t.me/farzidguychannell
❤16💩3🤮2
Signed FarZidGuy
26 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC571 views17 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Photo
Qasoskorlar: Intiho Kengaytirilgan versiyadagi qo’shilgan sahnalarni kòrmoqchi bolganlar Spoyler kanalga joyladim
https://t.me/+RhaBkNXQJFtiMWI6
❤15🔥1🤮1
Signed FarZidGuy
26 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC557 views21 reactionsread 29 September 2026 HAMMA QASOSKORLAR: INTIHO ENCORE DA QO'SHIMCHA SAHNALARNI KO'RDIMI?
🔥20💩1
Signed FarZidGuy
26 Sept 2026, 08:38 UTC610 views26 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Photo
Aka-uka Russo’lar “QASOSKORLAR: QIYOMAT KUNI” filmida Torning tasvirlanishi “CHEKSIZLIK JANGI”dagi obraziga o‘xshash bo‘lishini tasdiqlashdi.
“Bizda ushbu qahramon borasida aniq bir qarash bor. Biz aynan o‘sha — ‘CHEKSIZLIK JANGIr’dagi Tor obrazini davom ettiramiz.”
↪️https://t.me/farzidguychannell
🔥23❤2🤮1
Signed FarZidGuy
26 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC571 views24 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Photo
Jo Russo "QASOSKORLAR: QIYOMAT KUNI" filmida Torning tutadigan o‘rni haqida so‘z yuritdi:
"Bizga uning jangchi sifatidagi qiyofasi — bor narsasidan ayrilgan va janglar orqali hayot mazmunini izlayotgan o‘sha jangchi obrazi juda yoqadi. U o‘zining butun faoliyati davomida duch kelgan eng kuchli raqibga qarshi aynan shunday qiyofada kurash olib boradi. Treylerlardan ko‘rib turganingizdek, bu shiddatli va dahshatli jan…
❤23💩1
Signed FarZidGuy
26 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC545 views20 reactionsread 29 September 2026 Video
7 yildan so'ng o'sha xotiralarni esga olish uchun kinoteatrlarga boramiz.
↪️https://t.me/farzidguychannell
🔥19🤮1
Signed FarZidGuy
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @farzidguychannell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Yes Uzb | Rasmiy Kanal
@YesUzbRasmiy_1 · 19,864
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 29 September 2026 This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Farzidguy Channel” (@farzidguychannell), 1,239 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farzidguychannell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.