Channel
@farsi_fa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,809subscribers
+380 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001482930490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @farsi_fa |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/farsi_fa |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 18,809 | +51 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 18,758 | +28 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 18,730 | +7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 18,723 | +44 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 18,679 | +41 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 18,638 | +52 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 18,586 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 18,582 | +16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:27 | 18,566 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 18,571 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 18,581 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 18,576 | +22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:59 | 18,554 | -2,214 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 20,768 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 20,778 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 20,776 | +18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 20,758 | +21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 20,737 | +2,343 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 18,394 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 18,403 | first reading |
103 posts held, back to 8 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 48 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 103 (8 January 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 121,621 |
| Reactions total | 510 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,996 reactions across 102 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,483 | 74.3% | |
| 😍 | 125 | 6.26% | |
| 👏 | 101 | 5.06% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 2.51% | |
| 🥰 | 47 | 2.35% | |
| 👌 | 40 | 2.00% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 1.45% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 1.20% | |
| 🥴 | 23 | 1.15% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 0.601% | |
| 💘 | 10 | 0.501% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 0.501% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 0.451% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.301% | |
| 🤗 | 6 | 0.301% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.251% | |
| 🎄 | 4 | 0.2% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 0.15% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.15% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.1% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 0.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,996 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آن دو بیت چشم تو خیام را دیوانه کرد خانه و کاشانهی عطار را ویرانه کرد مثنویهای لبت را شصت من کاغذ کم است مولوی و شمس را با یکدگر بیگانه کرد هر چه شاعر بود و هر صاحبمقامی عاقبت! سرخوش از چشمانمستت راهی میخانه کرد #اعظم_تفرشی @farsi_fa
مثل گیسوی تو در باد به هم ریختهام بیتو من باز به دامان غم آویختهام گرچه رفتی دل من تا به ابد خانهی توست لحظهها را همه با عطر تو آمیختهام اشک چشمان تو شد باعث ویران شدنم ارگ بم بودم و بعد از تو فرو ریختهام #طاهره_اباذری @farsi_fa
❤1
گرفته باز، دل خستهام بهانهی دوست چه شد نوای دل انگیز عاشقانهی دوست اگر چه دیر زمانی ست رفته از خاطر رسد هنوز به گوش دلم ترانهی دوست ازین صدا که به هفت آسمان در افتاده ست به گوش کس نرسد نالهی شبانهی دوست #بیژن_ترقی @farsi_fa
❤2
ما به دست یار دادیم اختیار خویش را حاصلی زین به ندانستیم کار خویش را بر امید آن که روزی کار ما گیرد قرار سالها کردیم ضایع، روزگار خویش را هست خاک آستانت سجدهگاه اهل دل سجدی شکری بکن پروردگار خویش را #همام_تبریزی @farsi_fa
❤15👍1
مینویسم یک غزل بر روی دیوانی که نیست نام تو حک شد به روی نقش ایوانی که نیست فصلهای زندگی در حسرت رویت گذشت میشود فصل خزان با مهر و آبانی که نیست یوسف گم گشته باز آید به کنعان، ای دریغ یوسف گم گشتهی من قعر زندانی که نیست #اعظم_تفرشی @farsi_fa
❤11
هرگز دلم ز کوی تو جایی دگر نرفت یکدم خیال روی توام از نظر نرفت جان رفت و اشتیاق تو از جان بدر نشد سر رفت و آرزوی تو از سر بدر نرفت عمرم برفت در طلب عشق و عاقبت کامی نیافت خاطر و کاری بسر نرفت #عبید_زاکانی @farsi_fa
❤9
می شوند از سرد مهری، دوستان از هم جدا برگها را می کند باد خزان از هم جدا در نگیرد صحبت پیر و جوان با یکدگر تا به هم پیوست، شد تیر و کمان از هم جدا پیش ارباب بصیرت گفتگوی عشق و عقل هست چون بیداری و خواب گران از هم جدا #صائب_تبریزی @farsi_fa
❤10
ما را همه شب نمیبرد خواب ای خفتهی روزگار، دریاب در بادیه تشنگان بمردند وز حله به کوفه میرود آب ای سخت کمان سست پیمان این بود وفای عهد اصحاب؟ #سعدی @farsi_fa
❤4😢1
گر باز دگر باره ببینم مگر او را دارم ز سر شادی بر فرق سر او را سوگند خورم من به خدا و به سر او کاندر دو جهان دوست ندارم، مگر او را چندان که رسانید بلاها به سر من یا رب مرسان هیچ بلایی به سر او را #انوری @farsi_fa
❤10
مکن ای دوست ملامت، من سودایی را که تو روزی نکشیدی غم تنهایی را دیده خون گشت ز دیدار نگارم محروم بهر خوبان بکِشم منت بینایی را رویها را همه دارند ز زیبایی دوست دوست دارم سبب روی تو زیبایی را #همام_تبریزی @farsi_fa
😍4❤3
تا دیده دلم عارض آن رشک پری را پوشیده به تن جامهی دیوانه گری را چون مرد هنرپیشه به هر دوره ذلیل است خوش آنکه کند پیشهی خود، بی هنری را از روز ازل دست قضا قسمت ما کرد رسوایی و آوارگی و دربهدری را #فرخی_یزدی @farsi_fa
❤5😍1
سالیانی ست دلت مکتب و آئین من است چه کنم عشق تو هم مایهی تسکین من است همه روز و همه شب با غم عشق تو گذشت آخر این یاد تو بودن، غم شیرین من است #اعظم_تفرشی @farsi_fa
😍4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @farsi_fa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@farsi_fa edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اشعار زیبا و شعرهای عاشقانه” (@farsi_fa), 18,809 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farsi_fa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.