Channel
@farmedit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
497subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001682091943 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @farmedit |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/farmedit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 497 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 488 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 481 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 481 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
39 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 51.3% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 23.1% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 17.9% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2024 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hey everyone, Me and my friend have started a tiktok and ig farm. 0 upfront cost for you. You pay after we get you results. Dont need content from you either. We will make all the content with AI. If you’re interested, send me a dm: @croushore
❤1
Comment Karma Farming Bot for Reddit This bot can automatically farm comment karma for you on reddit using AI. All you need is an openai key, proxies and account. Features: Very easy setup(just download and start) Comes with other modules like automatic login so you don't need to login manually Cheap to farm karma(costs around $0.5 to get 500 karma) I will help you setup the bot as well so you don't need to worry …
❤12👍3🔥3
I am open to any opportunities in ofm or otherwise. I can make bots, have a lot of experience on reddit, botting and AI. Please be specific if you want to partner up. I am not interested in testing out your methods. If you want to partner up to scale your ops, I am open to that. @FARMEDitSALES
I also have a comment karma farming bot so you can send offers for that. It's outdated but I will update it if anyone is interested in purchasing it. (Send offers to @FARMEDitSALES Here are some of the accounts it was commenting with when i was running it: https://www.reddit.com/user/proyectaffvwj/ https://www.reddit.com/user/HeegonnommenokCv/
❤1
Hey guys, sorry to ghost on all of you but the shop is closed for the time being. Before i left, all orders were fulfilled. I have around 3-4k blank aged accounts left in my inventory. If anyone is interested in them, you can send me "interested in blank accounts" to @FARMEDitSALES. I don't have an exact count but 2-3k accounts were registered between April 24 and June 24. The rest are anywhere between 2020 and 2024…
❤2👍2
⚠️ 15% discount for the next 24 hours!
1.2k pk 315 ck 2+ years old $35 Profile transfer available @FARMEDitSALES
❤3
1.5k pk 147 cl 2+ years old $35 Profile transfer available sold
👍3
2.1k pk 202 cl 1+ year old $40 Profile transfer available sold
2.4k pk 3.4k ck 2+ years old $50 Profile transfer available sold
5.5k pk 2.7k cl 3+ years old $50 Profile transfer available sold
1.1k pk 616 ck 1+ year old $37 Profile transfer available sold
👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @farmedit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 614,798 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@farmedit named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FarmedIt - Karma Farmed Reddit Accounts” (@farmedit), 497 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farmedit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.