Channel
@farmby_dw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
95subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003159181664 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @farmby_dw |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 28 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/farmby_dw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 95 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 97 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 97 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 98 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
287 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5280473831562055110 | 122 | 42.5% | |
| custom 5280550110181229666 | 94 | 32.8% | |
| 🦄 | 16 | 5.57% | |
| custom 5186390537128641474 | 14 | 4.88% | |
| custom 5280480295487839476 | 11 | 3.83% | |
| custom 5298544910754940377 | 8 | 2.79% | |
| custom 5280733187457191083 | 7 | 2.44% | |
| custom 5327812076335299090 | 6 | 2.09% | |
| custom 5328179609571712085 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| custom 5436339869771141305 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.697% | |
| custom 5247204971937564665 | 1 | 0.348% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 287reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐚: Мы теперь выполняем бейдж 100 очков в автомате фина! Стоимость выполнения составляет 50 звёзд/рублей. Поэтому обращайтесь к нам, если не получается выполнить в нашего бота: @farmby_dw
custom 52805501101812296661
Signed Minka
ғᴀʀᴍʙʏ • инфо/пᴘᴀйс/отзывы pinned «🌟: Йоооо... Напоминаю, что в последнии часы ивентов заказы на всё, что с этими ивентами непосредственно связано, мы не принимаем. Извините, но идти на возможный риск и брать ответственность за шанс того, что заказ не будет выполнен, а вы в свою очередь потеряете…»
🌟: Йоооо... Напоминаю, что в последнии часы ивентов заказы на всё, что с этими ивентами непосредственно связано, мы не принимаем. Извините, но идти на возможный риск и брать ответственность за шанс того, что заказ не будет выполнен, а вы в свою очередь потеряете деньги, а мы — время, мы не готовы. P.S. пожалуй оставлю это сообщение висеть в закрепе, чтобы все были в курсе.
custom 52805501101812296661
Signed q_rayn_q
🥳: Мы теперь принимаем заказы на золотые скины! Есть проблемы с выполнением с ними? Не стесняйтесь спрашивать, пишите нам в бота! 🤩 @farmby_bot
custom 51863905371286414745custom 52985449107549403773custom 54363398697711413053
Signed Minka
🌟: Новые реакции!!🦋
custom 51863905371286414745custom 52804738315620551105
Signed q_rayn_q
🌹🥲😄🥹🙃😘 😌😍😀☺️🥰😄😇🥲🥰😘🤩 🤩✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ За 100% без Роджера 🤩ейн — 500 руб/звезд либо 690 рб. 🤩стальные — 100-150 руб/звезд либо 160-240 рб. (В зависимости от редкости) 100% с Роджером 🤩ейн — 400 руб/звезд либо 420 рб. 🤩стальные — 50-100 руб/звезд либо 80-160 рб. (В зависимости от редкости) 💭✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 100 ед. — 15 руб/звезд либо 20 рб. 500 ед. — 50 руб/звезд либо 80 рб. 1000 ед. — 125 руб/звезд либо 200 рб. 3000 ед. — 200 руб…
custom 52985449107549403775custom 51863905371286414744custom 52805501101812296662👾1custom 52804802954878394761
Signed q_rayn_q
🌟: — Походу в ближайшее время в рт постах будет один Сквирм.. #щп
🤨: Чуть позже наверное переделаю посты и сведу прем эмоджи к минимуму на покарёженных постах. #оффтоп
custom 52804802954878394765custom 52804738315620551102
🌟: Обновила, значит, тг и стало больно от половины слетевший эмодзи в постах... И самое крутое, что это никак не чинится. Надеюсь у других это выглядит так, как оно должно выглядеть... #оффтоп
custom 528047383156205511011🦄4
🌟🌟 Я ржу, почему буквально на всех постах кроме администрации и самих отзывах "скам" наставили? (Ставим скам)
custom 528047383156205511047
💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 💜ВЛАДЕЛЬЦЫ: 🍓 Рэйн • [она/её>любые] — владелец 🐚 Минька • [она/её] — совладелец 💜 КАЧЕРЫ: 🍓 Рэйн • [она/её>любые] 🐚 Минька • [она/её] 🎃 l2 • [он/его] 💜 АДМИНЫ ВП: 🍓 Рэйн • [она/её>любые] НАБОР?: 💜Качеры — не ищем. Пока хватает; нужно доверие к человеку. 💜Вп — набор открыт. [0/4] Анкета впшера 1) Ваш псевдо, местоимения, тун? 2) Сколько времени сможете уделять чату? 3) Имели ли опыт работы…
custom 52805501101812296666custom 53278120763352990906custom 52804738315620551104
🌟🌟: Всем привет! Хотелось бы сделать убедительную просьбу: не блокируйте нашего бота, если вы в него обратились. Мы можем ответить не сразу, но если вы заблокируете бота, то ответа от нас и вовсе не дождётесь. Бот был создан только с целью стать посредником между нами и клиентом, никаких рассылок или чего-то подобного не будет. Так же хочу отметить, что у бота нет ии или автоответов — он лишь передает ваши сообщения …
custom 528055011018122966610custom 52804802954878394763custom 52807331874571910833
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @farmby_dw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 985,866 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@farmby_dw named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ғᴀʀᴍʙʏ • инфо/пᴘᴀйс/отзывы” (@farmby_dw), 95 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farmby_dw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.