Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фарис

Channel

Фарис

@faris_case

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

13,675subscribers

-202 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526589120
TypeChannel
Username@faris_case
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/faris_case

Growth

13,67513,87713,7767 August 2026 — 13,877 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,877 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,866 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,869 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,865 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,852 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,833 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,823 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,847 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,863 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,837 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,818 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,799 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,789 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,778 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,765 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,746 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,729 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,691 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,675 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 20 days, net -202. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,645–13,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 23:0413,675-16
27 Aug 2026, 01:4813,691-38
26 Aug 2026, 00:1313,729-17
25 Aug 2026, 03:1313,746-19
23 Aug 2026, 17:5413,765-13
22 Aug 2026, 03:0413,778-11
20 Aug 2026, 17:3513,789-10
19 Aug 2026, 15:0313,799-19
18 Aug 2026, 13:2513,818-19
17 Aug 2026, 12:4213,837-26
16 Aug 2026, 02:1613,863+16
14 Aug 2026, 14:3513,847+24
13 Aug 2026, 07:1613,823-10
12 Aug 2026, 08:0213,833-19
11 Aug 2026, 09:5213,852-13
10 Aug 2026, 11:1213,865-4
9 Aug 2026, 12:3413,869+3
8 Aug 2026, 12:4713,866-11
7 Aug 2026, 19:4613,877no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:3713,877first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.7%
avg views ÷ 13,675 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,250
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held17 (15 July 202626 August 2026)
Views total62,510
Reactions total1,278
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,122 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,02348.2%
🔥41519.6%
👎23611.1%
😭1316.17%
😁1054.95%
🍓854.01%
👍442.07%
😱411.93%
🤔271.27%
🤯80.377%
🤣70.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC≈1,440 views122 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

я рисую этот чехол уже 3 раз, чето он людям понравился сильно )) Фрирен _________________ Samsung s26 Ultra

84🔥16🤔11👎6🍓5

17 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC≈5,260 views73 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

самый любимый учитель :) На ошибках учатся, после ошибок лечатся Какаши, Наруто ________________ iPhone 16 Pro Max

46🔥13👎7🤯4🤔2🍓1

15 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC≈5,620 views131 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Абсолютная королева, как хорошо получилось … «Вы думаете, это я сумасшедшая? Это вы ещё мою сестру не видели...» Джинкс, Аркейн _______________ iPhone 17

74🔥34🍓13👎8🤣2

11 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC≈6,990 views110 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

мне так угарно с этой джинкс 😹😹😹 нереальная работа, скоро выложу

😁65🔥2315👎6👍1

11 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC≈6,210 views132 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

снова рисую королев, и никто не запретит 🤩 Фрирен ________________ Samsung s24 Ultra

91🔥21🍓12👎7😱1

3 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC≈7,320 views96 reactionsread 27 August 2026

наконец-то начал рисовать Джинкс, ждал работу с ней 10 тысяч лет

65🔥18😭7👎6

2 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC≈7,750 views120 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

игрок под ником «Подпивас» Poco x3

69😁25🔥14👎7🤣3🤯2

2 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC≈7,420 views91 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

одна из самых интересных работ, где я объединил геометрию и цветы, растущие из трещин Придать этой работе можно самые разные смыслы, я вижу здесь нежность, проявляющуюся даже из камня! Xiaomi 13 Pro

65🔥13🍓8👎4👍1

1 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC≈6,580 views177 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

похудел на 10 кг, чувствую себя ужасно, мало работаю и ничего не хочется. Лечусь уже 4 месяц от инфекции, заразился с водой иногда дела идут не как мы задумали

😭122😱31🤔97👎5🍓2👍1

29 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC≈7,920 views226 reactionsread 27 August 2026

как я ненавижу жару этого лета, осень настань скорее!

👎11676🔥16👍9🤔5🍓2😭2

25 Jul 2026, 00:02 UTC≈9,530 views221 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

я иногда листаю старые работы с мыслью «стоп это Яяя нарисовал?» молодец вообще какой 😀

161🔥36👎10😁8😱3🤯2🍓1

24 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC≈8,480 views89 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

the road to nowhere

🔥56🍓1714👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @faris_case. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фарис” (@faris_case), 13,675 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/faris_case.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.