Channel
@farhodjon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,137subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001103322752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @farhodjon |
| Created | 20 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/farhodjon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 1,137 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 1,134 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 1,133 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 1,133 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (25 April 2026 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 490 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
191 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 140 | 73.3% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 23.6% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.57% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.05% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.524% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 191reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hacker News Digest 1.1 Dayjest biroz o’zgardi. Muhim muhokamalardan xabar topish uchun hafta oxirini kutish shartmas endi. Birinchidan, endi quyidagi tartibda xabarlar qo’yiladi: • kunning 3 ta top xabari; • oxirgi 2-3 soatda trendga chiqqan xabarlar zudlik bilan; • hafta dayjesti, lekin faqat top 10, ruknlarsiz. Ikkinchidan, xabarlarning formati o’zgardi. Hacker News’ning eng muhim tomoni - muhokamalar. Endi faqa…
🔥4
Aytishlaricha, Lenovo Xitoyda o’quvchilar uchun SI telefon sotuvga chiqaribdi. Narxi - $44. Agar qurilmalar bulutda ishlaydigan SI modellarining kliyentiga aylansa, bunaqa qurilmalar ko’payadi. Xuddi Chromebook faqat veb ilovalar uchun chiqarilgandek. https://www.cnbctv18.com/technology/lenovo-launches-ai-student-phone-in-china-with-no-web-browsers-social-media-its-price-will-shock-you-19937392.htm
👍4🔥1🤔1
Nyu-York kutubxonasida restoran menyularining maxsus katalogi bor. Yuqoridagi foto - katalogdagi eng birinchi menyu - 1843-yil 25-avgustdan. Katalogda 19-asrdan boshlab butun 20-asr va biroz 21-asrdagi menyular mavjud. Lekin dizaynni sevadiganlar uchun boshqa sahifa bor: https://pudding.cool/2026/06/menu-story/ Har bir menyuning detali, tarixiy konteksti yaxshi tushuntirilgan. Saytning va menyularning tipografikas…
👍4
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠💡5️⃣ Bollar, bugundan qaytdi. Tasdiqlayman!
👍20
📣 Hiring alert (Summer 2026 Edition) Anchadan buyon yangi vakansiyalar qo’yilmabdi bu kanalga. SI bizni to’laqonli almashtirishga ulgurmadi 😅 Tandirdan yaqinda va avvalroq chiqqan vakansiyalar quyida: • Senior Backend Engineer (Java) • Senior Backend Engineer II (Python) • Tech Lead Manager Ikkinchi vakansiya - Senior II. Qiyin muammolarni yechgan, arxitekturani zo’r biladigan, ham vertikal, ham gorizontal ta’sir…
🔥8👍4😱2
Amerika hukumatini Anthropic kompaniyasidan Fable va Myphos modellarini chet el fuqarolariga (hatto AQSh ichida bo’lsa ham) o’chrishni so’rabdi. Menimcha, buni amalga oshirish qiyin, shuning uchun, Anthropic HAMMA foydalanuvchilarga o’chiribdi. Endi Fable bilan boshlangan chatga xabar yozganda, Claude uzr so’rab, boshqa model tanlashni so’rayapti. https://www.anthropic.com/news/fable-mythos-access Bayram uzoqqa ch…
👍3
Oddiy xalqqa Claude Fable 5 modeli chiqqaniga ham 3 kun bo’ldi. Hozircha, uzuuun ishlaydigan topshiriqlar uchun /goal orqali juda yaxshi ishlayapti. Lekin Opus 4.8 ham yomonmasdi. Bitta juda yoqimsiz joyi bor: biror xavfsizlik yoki biologiya bilan bog’liq ishlayda Fable hadeb Opus’ga o’taveradi. Hatto o’zingiz qurayotgan mahsulotning ustida ishlaganingizda ham. “Let’s improve security”, “find vulnerabilities” kabi …
🔥8
Kimningdir, menga o’xshab, SI generatsiya qilayotgan matnlardagi o’ta sun’iylik yoqmayotgan bo’lsa, quyidagi skill juda foydali. 30 dan ortiq patternlarni olib tashlaydi yoki tuzatadi. Hozirgina topdim. Xalq bilan bo’lishish zarur, albatta. https://github.com/blader/humanizer
👍20🔥2😁1
Sizda qanaqa savol bor? Kandidatlarni intervyu qilayotganimda yuqoridagi savolga har doim ham yaxshi javob olmayman. Ko’p kandidatlar savoli yo’qligini yoki avvalgi qadamlarda hamma savollarga javob olganini aytishadi. Lekin, bu menga intervyuga kelgan odam yaxshi tayyorlanmaganini bildiradi. Nega? Intervyu jarayoni faqat bir tomonlama emas. Kompaniya kandidatni qanaqa tekshirsa, kandidat ham kompaniyani yaxshilab …
👍20
Google’ning ham didi oshib boryapti. 2-3 kundan buyon Google Calendar ikonkasini ko’rib hayron bo’layotgandim. Xuddi asosiy logosi kabi, hamma mahsulotlaridagi ikonkalarni ham gradient bilan yangilab chiqyapti. Ayniqsa, bechora Tasks 2009-yildan 2026-yilga moslashibdi. Yana yaxshi tomoni - har bir mahsulot ikonkasi o’zining rangiga ega. Avvalgi versiyalari odamni chalkashtirardi. Lekin boshqa muammo bor: gradientl…
🔥9👍3
ClickUp asoschisi va direktori Zeb Evans’ning maqolasini o’qib chiqdim. Maqoladagi 2-3 ta fikr sohaning yaqin kelajagini ko’rsatayotgandek. 1. 100 marta ko’p natija beradigan rollar (100X) bir yil avvalgiga nisbatan tubdan farq qiladi. Tabiiy ravishda bu rollarning o’zgarishi kutish - kompaniya ortda qolishini bildiradi. Hozirgi jarayonlar o’zgartirilmasa, ular SI uchun to’siqqa aylanadi. 2. Injenerlarning asosiy is…
👍8
Yozib bo‘lishga ulgurmasimdan ClickUp kompaniyasi ham xodimlarni 22 foizga qisqartirishga qaror qilganini ko‘ryapman: https://x.com/DJ_CURFEW/status/2057522382315929802 Har bir injener, dizayner va mahsulot menejeri o‘qishi lozim bo‘lgan maqola. Qiziq tomoni: qolayotgan odamlarning eng zo‘rlariga (katta ta’sir keltiradiganlariga) 1 million dollarlik daromad taklif qilinadi!
🔥5👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @farhodjon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 374,749 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Far·hod·jon” (@farhodjon), 1,137 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farhodjon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.