Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فقط انسانی⚖️

Channel

فقط انسانی⚖️

@faqat_ensani

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,557subscribers

-798 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001319369615
TypeChannel
Username@faqat_ensani
Descriptionمشاور تخصصی -فقط رشته انسانی - فارغ التحصیل ِحقوق دانشگاه تهران⚖️ "رتبه ۴۳۹ کنکور ۹۹" (انگیزشی"زرد "بلد نیستم، صرفاً واقعیت هارو به دور از "حاشیه "باز گو میکنم.) ( برای درخواست مشاوره ماهانه /مشاوره تک جلسه به این اکانت @faqatensani_adminپیام بدین.)
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/faqat_ensani

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,5577,3556,95618 September 2026 — 7,355 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,355 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,208 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,103 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,021 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,987 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,928 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,867 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,697 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,634 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,618 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,581 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,557 subscribers18 September 20266 November 2026
13 measurements spanning 49 days, net -798. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,437–7,475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 18:476,557-24
3 Nov 2026, 13:476,581-37
31 Oct 2026, 09:566,618-16
28 Oct 2026, 14:006,634-63
25 Oct 2026, 15:096,697-170
22 Oct 2026, 08:386,867-61
18 Oct 2026, 18:076,928-59
15 Oct 2026, 12:066,987-34
12 Oct 2026, 12:187,021-82
5 Oct 2026, 19:387,103-105
28 Sept 2026, 17:197,208-147
18 Sept 2026, 13:227,355no change
18 Sept 2026, 12:477,355first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 6,557 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held38 (8 September 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total22,306
Reactions total721
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 06:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
717
Videos
51
Links
71

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,127 reactions across 36 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,10197.7%
👍262.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC542 views44 reactionsread 7 November 2026

منتظری اون لحظه ای هستی که حالت خوبه، انگیزه داری، همه چی محیا باشه تا شروع کنی، هیچ وقت نمیاد اون لحظه. باید همین الان، در اوج نا امیدی شروع کنی، تا اوضاعت بهتر بشه.

❤44

4 Nov 2026, 15:18 UTC534 views40 reactionsread 7 November 2026

باید وقتی حالت بده و هیچی امیدی به پیشرفتت نداری، دقیقاً از همون نقطه شروع کنی.✨

❤40

2 Nov 2026, 01:45 UTC833 views65 reactionsread 7 November 2026

تفاوت ها دقیقاً همین جا مشخص میشه. چند نفر مگه این ساعت، اسختی زود بیدار شدن تحمل می کنن؟ -خیلی خیلی کم.

❤65

2 Nov 2026, 01:34 UTC838 views52 reactionsread 7 November 2026

کسی که شوقِ رسیدن داره، با همون آلارم اول این ساعت بلند میشه.

❤47👍5

31 Oct 2026, 13:13 UTC≈1,160 views36 reactionsread 7 November 2026

چه قبول کنی و چه نکنی، کنکوری بودن یعنی اینکه از یک دقیقه روزت هم ساده نگذری.

❤36

31 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,130 views27 reactionsread 7 November 2026

همین ساعت هایی که به نظرت مهم نیستن، هر کدوم از اتلافی های روزت رو کم کنی، در آخر میبینی ساعت مطالعت به طرز عجیبی بالا اومد، فقط با یه ساعت بندی دقیق!

❤27

31 Oct 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,120 views24 reactionsread 7 November 2026

بدون پارت بندی و نظم روزت پیش نمیره. اینکه شروع کنی به خوندن، ولی هر استراحتت نیم ساعت، بیست دقیقه یک ساعت باشه، کل تایم مفید روزت از بین میره. باید برای هر ساعت از روزت، پارت بندی و ساعت بندی دقیق داشته باشی.

❤24

31 Oct 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,030 views23 reactionsread 7 November 2026

۶ ساعت مفید خوندن بهتر از صفر ساعت هست. پس بدون بهونه شروع کن. مخصوصاً بچه هایی که مدرسه میرن و میگن ساعت مطالعمون کمه.

❤23

31 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,080 views27 reactionsread 7 November 2026

5-6 6.15-7.15 7.30-8.30 8.45-9.45 10-11 11.15-12.15 استفاده نکردن درست از نیمه اول روز، به معنی از دست دادن کامل روز نیست! همچنان میشه 6 ساعت مفید خوند.

❤27

30 Oct 2026, 14:28 UTC≈1,160 views44 reactionsread 7 November 2026

با خودت رو راست باش، به نظرت این میزان تلاش، تست، ساعت مطالعه، برای رسیدن به اون چیزی که می خوای، کافیه؟

❤43👍1

30 Oct 2026, 14:26 UTC999 views33 reactionsread 7 November 2026

جمعه ها، برای غصه خوردن از عملکرد ضعیف هفته ای که گذشت نیست. از عملکردت راضی نیستی؟ یه هفته جدید پیش رو داری، که میتونی الان براش برنامه ریزی کنی و اولین قدم رو برای تغییر روندت برداری.

❤33

28 Oct 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,250 views46 reactionsread 7 November 2026

اون چندتا تست قرابت، آرایه و عروض که اصطلاحاً برای خودت "روتین" گذاشتی، اگر بذاری آخرِ شب هم بی کیفیت انجامش میدی و هم هر شب پشت گوش میندازی، به من گوش بدین و اولین پارت مطالعاتی روز بذارید.

❤45👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @faqat_ensani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Sept 2026, 16:20 UTCAnonymous Poll411 voters

جهت اینکه بدونم الان بیشتر کدوم دسته هستید؟

  1. دوازدهمی34%
  2. پشت کنکوری66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

محافظ کانال علوم و فنون | عماد قربی
@adabiyatghorbi · 896
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 September 2026
مهدی ضیائی | رتبه یک کنکور
@mahdiziaei_official · 23,782
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فقط انسانی⚖️” (@faqat_ensani), 6,557 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/faqat_ensani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.